Dependence of Radiation Dose on Area and Volumetric Mammographic Breast Density Estimation

被引:0
|
作者
Jing, H. [1 ]
Keller, B. [1 ]
Choi, J. Y. [1 ]
Crescenzi, R. [1 ]
Conant, E. [1 ]
Maidment, A. [1 ]
Kontos, D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Dept Radiol, Perelman Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
Digital Mammography; mammographic density estimation; imaging radiation dose; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; PARENCHYMAL PATTERNS; IMAGE QUALITY; CANCER RISK; CLASSIFICATION; ASSOCIATION; PHANTOM;
D O I
10.1117/12.2007989
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
Mammographic breast density is a strong risk factor for breast cancer. Studies on imaging dose in mammography have primarily focused on imaging quality and diagnostic accuracy, while little work has been done on understanding its effect on the estimation of breast density. Studies on the effect of dose on mammographic density estimation can be useful in dose reduction for the purpose of density estimation and monitoring. In this study, we investigate the dependence of percent area (PD%) and volumetric (VD%) breast density estimation on imaging dose using an anthropomorphic breast phantom (Rachel, Gammex). A set of digital mammograms were obtained with a GE Senographe 2000D FFDM system, using 220 unique combinations of different imaging physics, namely target/filter, kVp and mAs. Specifically, 8 different mAs settings were defined as corresponding to 10%, 20%, 40%, 70%, 100%, 150%, 200% and 300% of 1.8 mGy reference average glandular dose (AGD) for standard phototimed exposure. Breast density was estimated using fully-automated FDA-cleared software (Quantra v.2.0, Hologic Inc.). The obtained estimates were analyzed to study the effect of the imaging dose, using ANOVA and linear regression. Results show that there is a statistically significant dependence of density estimation on x-ray imaging dose (p-value=0.014 and <0.001 for PD% and VD%, respectively), while the actual variation of the estimation across the different levels of dose is relatively low (standard deviation of 2.87% and 0.66% for PD% and VD% respectively), the differences could be significant when breast density measures are used for risk estimation.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mammographic Density Estimation with Automated Volumetric Breast Density Measurement
    Ko, Su Yeon
    Kim, Eun-Kyung
    Kim, Min Jung
    Moon, Hee Jung
    [J]. KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2014, 15 (03) : 313 - 321
  • [2] Breast density estimation: Correlation of mammographic density and MR volumetric density
    Chan, HP
    Hadjiiski, LM
    Roubidoux, MA
    Helvie, MA
    Paquerault, S
    Sahiner, B
    Wei, J
    Zhou, C
    Chenevert, T
    Goodsitt, MM
    [J]. DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 281 - 284
  • [3] Estimation of breast radiation dose in a mammographic system
    Lee, KH
    Kandaiya, S
    [J]. APPLIED RADIATION AND ISOTOPES, 1996, 47 (03) : 361 - 363
  • [4] IONIZING RADIATION AND VOLUMETRIC MAMMOGRAPHIC DENSITY
    Peplonska, Beata
    Mirowski, Mateusz
    Kaluzny, Pawel
    Domienik-Andrzejewska, Joanna
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 2022, 35 (05) : 635 - 649
  • [5] Agreement of Mammographic Measures of Volumetric Breast Density to MRI
    Wang, Jeff
    Azziz, Ania
    Fan, Bo
    Malkov, Serghei
    Klifa, Catherine
    Newitt, David
    Yitta, Silaja
    Hylton, Nola
    Kerlikowske, Karla
    Shepherd, John A.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (12):
  • [6] An alternative approach to measuring volumetric mammographic breast density
    Tromans, Christopher
    Brady, Michael
    [J]. DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, 4046 : 26 - 33
  • [7] Mammographic breast density and breast cancer risk: Evaluation using volumetric breast density software
    Koshi, Suzanne
    Singla, Veenu
    Singh, Tulika
    Prabhakar, Nidhi
    Bal, Amanjit
    Singh, Gurpreet
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2020, 16 (06) : 1258 - 1264
  • [8] A scatter model for use in measuring volumetric mammographic breast density
    Tromans, Christopher
    Brady, Michael
    [J]. DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, 4046 : 251 - 258
  • [9] Improving Mammographic Density Estimation in the Breast Periphery
    Chen, Xin
    Moschidis, Emmanouil
    Taylor, Chris
    Astley, Susan
    [J]. BREAST IMAGING, IWDM 2016, 2016, 9699 : 469 - 477
  • [10] Using Volumetric Breast Density to Quantify the Potential Masking Risk of Mammographic Density
    Destounis, Stamatia
    Johnston, Lisa
    Highnam, Ralph
    Arieno, Andrea
    Morgan, Renee
    Chan, Ariane
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2017, 208 (01) : 222 - 227