IONIZING RADIATION AND VOLUMETRIC MAMMOGRAPHIC DENSITY

被引:0
|
作者
Peplonska, Beata [1 ]
Mirowski, Mateusz [2 ]
Kaluzny, Pawel [1 ]
Domienik-Andrzejewska, Joanna [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Nofer Inst Occupat Med, Dept Environm Epidemiol, Lodz, Poland
[2] Nofer Inst Occupat Med, Dept Radiat Protect, Lodz, Poland
[3] Nofer Inst Occupat Med, Dept Radiat Protect, Sw Teresy 8, PL-91348 Lodz, Poland
关键词
breast cancer; ionizing radiation; mammography; effective dose; mammographic density; organ dose; BREAST-CANCER INCIDENCE; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; RISK; MECHANISMS; FIBROSIS; THERAPY;
D O I
10.13075/ijomeh.1896.01916
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objectives: Mammographic density (MD) refers to the percentage of dense tissue of an entire breast and was proposed to be used as a surrogate marker for breast cancer. High-dose ionizing radiation (IR) has been recognized as a breast cancer risk factor. The aim of our study was to investigate association between lifetime low dose ionizing radiation (LDIR) and MD. Material and Methods: A cross-sectional study included 467 women aged 40-60 years who underwent screening mammography in Lodz, Poland. The digital mammography examination of the breasts included both craniocaudal and mediolateral oblique views. The volumetric breast density (VBD) (%) and fibrograndular tissue volume (FG) (cm3) were deter-mined based on the analysis of mammographic image ("for processing") using Volpara Imaging Software. The exposure to IR was estimated for each individual, based on the data from interviews about diagnostic or therapeutic medical procedures performed in the area of the neck, chest, abdomen and spine, which involved X-rays and gamma rays and the data about the doses derived from literature. Linear and logistic regression were fitted with VBD and FG as the outcomes and organ breast dose, effective dose and number of mammographies as the determinants, adjusted for major confounders. Results: The analyses showed no association between VBD or FG and the breast organ dose or the effective dose. The only significant finding ob-served concerned the association between the number of mammographies and the FG volume with beta coefficient: 0.028 (95% CI: 0.012-0.043), and predicted mean FG volume >13.4 cm3 among the women with >3 mammographies when compared to those with none. Conclusions: This study does not, in general, provide support for the positive association between LDIR and MD. The weak association of the FG volume with the number of mammographies warrants further verification in larger independent studies. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2022;35(5):635 - 49
引用
收藏
页码:635 / 649
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Dependence of Radiation Dose on Area and Volumetric Mammographic Breast Density Estimation
    Jing, H.
    Keller, B.
    Choi, J. Y.
    Crescenzi, R.
    Conant, E.
    Maidment, A.
    Kontos, D.
    [J]. MEDICAL IMAGING 2013: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2013, 8668
  • [2] Breast density estimation: Correlation of mammographic density and MR volumetric density
    Chan, HP
    Hadjiiski, LM
    Roubidoux, MA
    Helvie, MA
    Paquerault, S
    Sahiner, B
    Wei, J
    Zhou, C
    Chenevert, T
    Goodsitt, MM
    [J]. DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 281 - 284
  • [3] Mammographic Density Estimation with Automated Volumetric Breast Density Measurement
    Ko, Su Yeon
    Kim, Eun-Kyung
    Kim, Min Jung
    Moon, Hee Jung
    [J]. KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2014, 15 (03) : 313 - 321
  • [4] The Effect of Weight Change on Volumetric Measures of Mammographic Density
    Hart, V
    Reeves, K. W.
    Sturgeon, S. R.
    Reich, N. G.
    Sievert, L. L.
    Kerli-Kowske, K.
    Ma, L.
    Shepherd, J.
    Tice, J.
    Sprague, B. L.
    [J]. CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2015, 24 (04) : 761 - 761
  • [5] Agreement of Mammographic Measures of Volumetric Breast Density to MRI
    Wang, Jeff
    Azziz, Ania
    Fan, Bo
    Malkov, Serghei
    Klifa, Catherine
    Newitt, David
    Yitta, Silaja
    Hylton, Nola
    Kerlikowske, Karla
    Shepherd, John A.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (12):
  • [6] An alternative approach to measuring volumetric mammographic breast density
    Tromans, Christopher
    Brady, Michael
    [J]. DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, 4046 : 26 - 33
  • [7] Mammographic density measurement: A comparison of automated volumetric density measurement to BIRADS
    McEntee, Mark F.
    Damases, Christine N.
    [J]. MEDICAL IMAGING 2014: IMAGE PERCEPTION, OBSERVER PERFORMANCE, AND TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2014, 9037
  • [8] Using Volumetric Breast Density to Quantify the Potential Masking Risk of Mammographic Density
    Destounis, Stamatia
    Johnston, Lisa
    Highnam, Ralph
    Arieno, Andrea
    Morgan, Renee
    Chan, Ariane
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2017, 208 (01) : 222 - 227
  • [9] A scatter model for use in measuring volumetric mammographic breast density
    Tromans, Christopher
    Brady, Michael
    [J]. DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, 4046 : 251 - 258
  • [10] New step-wedge for the volumetric measurement of mammographic density
    Diffey, Jennifer
    Hufton, Alan
    Astley, Susan
    [J]. DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, 4046 : 1 - 9