Accuracy of Digital Impressions at Varying Implant Depths: An In Vitro Study

被引:16
|
作者
Sequeira, Vivia [1 ]
Harper, Matthew T. [1 ]
Lilly, Christa L. [2 ]
Bryington, Matthew S. [1 ]
机构
[1] West Virginia Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Restorat Dent, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA
[2] West Virginia Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Sch Publ Hlth, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA
关键词
CAD-CAM; implant-supported prosthesis; Intraoral scan body; Intraoral scanner; DENTAL IMPRESSIONS; SCAN BODIES; TECHNOLOGY; PRECISION; COMPLICATIONS; LIGHT; TIME;
D O I
10.1111/jopr.13496
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose Implants placed at variable depths may vary the amount of visible scannable surface of a scan body. Intraoral scanner technology uses advanced optical principles to record the surface of the scan body to accurately capture the implant position. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect implant placement depth has on the accuracy of digital implant impressions using an intraoral scanner. Materials and methods A partially edentulous gypsum master model was fabricated to allow the positioning of a single implant analog at different depths. Four groups were created based on the planned implant depths of 7, 6, 3, and 0 mm and corresponding visibility of the scan body at 2, 3, 6, and 9 mm. The model was digitized with a laboratory scanner for the reference scan and with an intraoral scanner to generate 15 test scans per group, with a total of 60 scans. The test scans were superimposed onto the reference scan using the best fit algorithm to analyze and measure the positional (dXYZ) and angular deviation (d ⍬) of the scan body using three-dimensional metrology software. Statistical analysis was performed using a one-way ANOVA and pairwise comparison was done with a Tukey-Kramer HSD test (alpha = 0.05). Results The one-way ANOVA of the groups for the dXYZ and d theta parameters was statistically significant (F-3,F-56 = 11.45, p < 0.001, F-3,F-56 = 24.04, p < 0.001). Group D (9 mm) showed the least positional deviation at 38.41 mu m (95% CI 30.26; 46.56) and the least angular deviation of 0.17 degrees (95% CI 0.12; 0.21). Group A (2 mm) showed the greatest positional deviation of 77.17 mu m (95% CI 65.23; 89.11) and greatest angular deviation of 0.84 degrees (95% CI 0.65; 1.03). The positional and angular deviation increased with increased implant depth. Conclusions The accuracy of digital impressions is influenced by the implant depth and the amount of visibility of the scan body. The trueness and precision are highest when the implant is placed at 0 mm depth with complete visibility of the scan body and decreases with subgingival implant placement.
引用
收藏
页码:54 / 61
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] In vitro accuracy of digital and conventional impressions in the partially edentulous maxilla
    Moritz Waldecker
    Stefan Rues
    Junior Sinclair Awounvo Awounvo
    Peter Rammelsberg
    Wolfgang Bömicke
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2022, 26 : 6491 - 6502
  • [42] Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Digital Implant Impressions: Effects of Different Scanners and Implant Level
    Chew, Amelia A.
    Esguerra, Roxanna J.
    Teoh, K. H.
    Wong, K. M.
    Ng, Simon D.
    Tan, Keson B.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2017, 32 (01) : 70 - 80
  • [43] Conventional and Digital Impressions for Fabrication of Complete Implant-Supported Bars: A Comparative In Vitro Study
    Vieira, Samanta N. V.
    Lourenco, Matheus F.
    Pereira, Rodrigo C.
    Franca, Esdras C.
    Vilaca, Enio L.
    Silveira, Rodrigo R.
    Silva, Guilherme C.
    MATERIALS, 2023, 16 (11)
  • [44] Accuracy of conventional impressions and digital scans for implant-supported fixed prostheses in maxillary free-ended partial edentulism: An in vitro study
    El Osta, Nada
    Drancourt, Noemie
    Auduc, Chantal
    Veyrune, Jean-Luc
    Nicolas, Emmanuel
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2024, 143
  • [45] Digital versus conventional implant impressions for partially edentulous arches: An evaluation of accuracy
    Marghalani, Amin
    Weber, Hans-Peter
    Finkelman, Matthew
    Kudara, Yukio
    El Rafie, Khaled
    Papaspyridakos, Panos
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2018, 119 (04): : 574 - 579
  • [46] Comparing the accuracy of full-arch implant impressions using the conventional technique and digital scans with and without prefabricated landmarks in the mandible: An in vitro study
    Ke, Yifang
    Zhang, Yaopeng
    Wang, Yong
    Chen, Hu
    Sun, Yuchun
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2023, 135
  • [47] Effect of reference objects on the accuracy of digital implant impressions in partially edentulous arches
    Rutkunas, Vygandas
    Cius, Darius Jegelevi
    Pletkus, Justinas
    Skalnis, Liudas Au
    Akulauskas, Mykolas
    Eyueboglu, Tan Firat
    Ozcan, Mutlu
    Gedrimiene, Agne
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED PROSTHODONTICS, 2024, 16 (05): : 302 - 310
  • [48] THE ACCURACY OF IMPLANT IMPRESSIONS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Lee, Heeje
    So, Joseph S.
    Hochstedler, J. L.
    Ercoli, Carlo
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2008, 100 (04): : 285 - 291
  • [49] Digital versus radiographic accuracy evaluation of guided implant surgery: an in vitro study
    Chun Yi
    Sha Li
    Aonan Wen
    Yong Wang
    Yijiao Zhao
    Yu Zhang
    BMC Oral Health, 22
  • [50] Digital versus radiographic accuracy evaluation of guided implant surgery: an in vitro study
    Yi, Chun
    Li, Sha
    Wen, Aonan
    Wang, Yong
    Zhao, Yijiao
    Zhang, Yu
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2022, 22 (01)