Accuracy of Digital Impressions at Varying Implant Depths: An In Vitro Study

被引:16
|
作者
Sequeira, Vivia [1 ]
Harper, Matthew T. [1 ]
Lilly, Christa L. [2 ]
Bryington, Matthew S. [1 ]
机构
[1] West Virginia Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Restorat Dent, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA
[2] West Virginia Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Sch Publ Hlth, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA
关键词
CAD-CAM; implant-supported prosthesis; Intraoral scan body; Intraoral scanner; DENTAL IMPRESSIONS; SCAN BODIES; TECHNOLOGY; PRECISION; COMPLICATIONS; LIGHT; TIME;
D O I
10.1111/jopr.13496
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose Implants placed at variable depths may vary the amount of visible scannable surface of a scan body. Intraoral scanner technology uses advanced optical principles to record the surface of the scan body to accurately capture the implant position. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect implant placement depth has on the accuracy of digital implant impressions using an intraoral scanner. Materials and methods A partially edentulous gypsum master model was fabricated to allow the positioning of a single implant analog at different depths. Four groups were created based on the planned implant depths of 7, 6, 3, and 0 mm and corresponding visibility of the scan body at 2, 3, 6, and 9 mm. The model was digitized with a laboratory scanner for the reference scan and with an intraoral scanner to generate 15 test scans per group, with a total of 60 scans. The test scans were superimposed onto the reference scan using the best fit algorithm to analyze and measure the positional (dXYZ) and angular deviation (d ⍬) of the scan body using three-dimensional metrology software. Statistical analysis was performed using a one-way ANOVA and pairwise comparison was done with a Tukey-Kramer HSD test (alpha = 0.05). Results The one-way ANOVA of the groups for the dXYZ and d theta parameters was statistically significant (F-3,F-56 = 11.45, p < 0.001, F-3,F-56 = 24.04, p < 0.001). Group D (9 mm) showed the least positional deviation at 38.41 mu m (95% CI 30.26; 46.56) and the least angular deviation of 0.17 degrees (95% CI 0.12; 0.21). Group A (2 mm) showed the greatest positional deviation of 77.17 mu m (95% CI 65.23; 89.11) and greatest angular deviation of 0.84 degrees (95% CI 0.65; 1.03). The positional and angular deviation increased with increased implant depth. Conclusions The accuracy of digital impressions is influenced by the implant depth and the amount of visibility of the scan body. The trueness and precision are highest when the implant is placed at 0 mm depth with complete visibility of the scan body and decreases with subgingival implant placement.
引用
收藏
页码:54 / 61
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of the accuracy between conventional and various digital implant impressions for an implant-supported mandibular complete arch-fixed prosthesis: An in vitro study
    Kosago, Pitchaporn
    Ungurawasaporn, Chatcharwin
    Kukiattrakoon, Boonlert
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2023, 32 (07): : 616 - 624
  • [32] Influence of Different Factors on the Accuracy of Digital Impressions of Multiple Implants: An In Vitro Study
    Zhang, Yi-Jie
    Qiao, Shi-Chong
    Qian, Shu-Jiao
    Zhang, Chu-Nan
    Shi, Jun-Yu
    Lai, Hong-Chang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2021, 36 (03) : 442 - 449
  • [33] AN IN VITRO COMPARISON OF THE ACCURACY OF IMPLANT IMPRESSIONS WITH CODED HEALING ABUTMENTS AND DIFFERENT IMPLANT ANGULATIONS
    Al-Abdullah, Khaled
    Zandparsa, Roya
    Finkelman, Matthew
    Hirayama, Hiroshi
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2013, 110 (02): : 90 - 100
  • [34] Accuracy of digital implant impressions with intraoral scanners. A systematic review
    Rutkunas, Vygandas
    Geciauskaite, Agne
    Jegelevicius, Darius
    Vaitiekunas, Mantas
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2017, 10 : 101 - 120
  • [35] Digital versus conventional implant impressions for edentulous patients: accuracy outcomes
    Papaspyridakos, Panos
    Gallucci, German O.
    Chen, Chun-Jung
    Hanssen, Stijn
    Naert, Ignace
    Vandenberghe, Bart
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2016, 27 (04) : 465 - 472
  • [36] Accuracy of digital and conventional dental implant impressions for fixed partial dentures: A comparative clinical study
    Gedrimiene, Agne
    Adaskevicius, Rimas
    Rutkunas, Vygandas
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED PROSTHODONTICS, 2019, 11 (05): : 271 - 279
  • [37] Accuracy of digital impressions for implant-supported complete-arch prosthesis, using an auxiliary geometry part-An in vitro study
    Iturrate, Mikel
    Eguiraun, Harkaitz
    Solaberrieta, Eneko
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2019, 30 (12) : 1250 - 1258
  • [38] Accuracy of Implant Casts Generated with Conventional and Digital ImpressionsAn In Vitro Study
    Ribeiro, Paulo
    Herrero-Climent, Mariano
    Diaz-Castro, Carmen
    Rios-Santos, Jose Vicente
    Padros, Roberto
    Mur, Javier Gil
    Falcao, Carlos
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 15 (08):
  • [39] Accuracy of digital implant impressions using a novel structured light scanning system assisted by a planar mirror in the edentulous maxilla: An in vitro study
    Ke, Yifang
    Zhang, Yaopeng
    Tian, Sukun
    Chen, Hu
    Sun, Yuchun
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2024, 35 (08) : 876 - 887
  • [40] In vitro accuracy of digital and conventional impressions in the partially edentulous maxilla
    Waldecker, Moritz
    Rues, Stefan
    Awounvo Awounvo, Junior Sinclair
    Rammelsberg, Peter
    Boemicke, Wolfgang
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2022, 26 (11) : 6491 - 6502