Accuracy of Digital Impressions at Varying Implant Depths: An In Vitro Study

被引:16
|
作者
Sequeira, Vivia [1 ]
Harper, Matthew T. [1 ]
Lilly, Christa L. [2 ]
Bryington, Matthew S. [1 ]
机构
[1] West Virginia Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Restorat Dent, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA
[2] West Virginia Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Sch Publ Hlth, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY | 2023年 / 32卷 / 01期
关键词
CAD-CAM; implant-supported prosthesis; Intraoral scan body; Intraoral scanner; DENTAL IMPRESSIONS; SCAN BODIES; TECHNOLOGY; PRECISION; COMPLICATIONS; LIGHT; TIME;
D O I
10.1111/jopr.13496
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose Implants placed at variable depths may vary the amount of visible scannable surface of a scan body. Intraoral scanner technology uses advanced optical principles to record the surface of the scan body to accurately capture the implant position. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect implant placement depth has on the accuracy of digital implant impressions using an intraoral scanner. Materials and methods A partially edentulous gypsum master model was fabricated to allow the positioning of a single implant analog at different depths. Four groups were created based on the planned implant depths of 7, 6, 3, and 0 mm and corresponding visibility of the scan body at 2, 3, 6, and 9 mm. The model was digitized with a laboratory scanner for the reference scan and with an intraoral scanner to generate 15 test scans per group, with a total of 60 scans. The test scans were superimposed onto the reference scan using the best fit algorithm to analyze and measure the positional (dXYZ) and angular deviation (d ⍬) of the scan body using three-dimensional metrology software. Statistical analysis was performed using a one-way ANOVA and pairwise comparison was done with a Tukey-Kramer HSD test (alpha = 0.05). Results The one-way ANOVA of the groups for the dXYZ and d theta parameters was statistically significant (F-3,F-56 = 11.45, p < 0.001, F-3,F-56 = 24.04, p < 0.001). Group D (9 mm) showed the least positional deviation at 38.41 mu m (95% CI 30.26; 46.56) and the least angular deviation of 0.17 degrees (95% CI 0.12; 0.21). Group A (2 mm) showed the greatest positional deviation of 77.17 mu m (95% CI 65.23; 89.11) and greatest angular deviation of 0.84 degrees (95% CI 0.65; 1.03). The positional and angular deviation increased with increased implant depth. Conclusions The accuracy of digital impressions is influenced by the implant depth and the amount of visibility of the scan body. The trueness and precision are highest when the implant is placed at 0 mm depth with complete visibility of the scan body and decreases with subgingival implant placement.
引用
收藏
页码:54 / 61
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Accuracy of digital and conventional implant impressions in edentulous jaws: A clinical comparative study
    Kernen-Gintaute, A.
    Akulauskas, M.
    Kernen, F.
    Zitzmann, N. U.
    Spies, B. C.
    Burkhardt, F.
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2025, 153
  • [22] Comparative accuracy of digital impressions using universal dual-purpose scan jigs for maxillary implant full arch impressions: An in vitro study
    Almalki, Abdulrahman
    Akl, Mohmmed
    Robaian, Ali
    Althubaitiy, Ramzi
    Alnasser, Abdullah
    Anadioti, Evanthia
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2025,
  • [23] Do digital impressions have a greater accuracy for full-arch implant-supported reconstructions compared to conventional impressions? An in vitro study
    Shaikh, Mohsin
    Lakha, Tabrez
    Kheur, Supriya
    Qamri, Batul
    Kheur, Mohit
    THE JOURNAL OF INDIAN PROSTHODONTIC SOCIETY, 2022, 22 (04) : 398 - 404
  • [24] In Vitro Accuracy of Digital and Conventional Impressions for Full-Arch Implant-Supported Prostheses
    D'haese, Rani
    Vrombaut, Tom
    Roeykens, Herman
    Vandeweghe, Stefan
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (03)
  • [25] Evaluation of the accuracy of digital impressions with different scanning strategies: An in vitro study
    Ortensi, Luca
    La Rosa, Giusy Rita Maria
    Ciletta, Stefania
    Granded, Francesco
    Pedulla, Eugenio
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2024, 151
  • [26] Impact of Different Scan Bodies and Scan Strategies on the Accuracy of Digital Implant Impressions Assessed with an Intraoral Scanner: An In Vitro Study
    Motel, Constantin
    Kirchner, Elena
    Adler, Werner
    Wichmann, Manfred
    Matta, Ragai Edward
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2020, 29 (04): : 309 - 314
  • [27] Effect of different impression coping and scan body designs on the accuracy of conventional versus digital implant impressions: An in vitro study
    Alkindi, Shaikha
    Hamdoon, Zaid
    Aziz, Ahmed M.
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2024, 146
  • [28] Comparison of the Clinical Accuracy of Digital and Conventional Dental Implant Impressions
    Rutkunas, Vygandas
    Gedrimiene, Agne
    Adaskevicius, Rimas
    Husain, Nadin Al-Haj
    Ozcan, Mutlu
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2020, 28 (04): : 173 - 181
  • [29] Accuracy of digital implant impressions in clinical studies: A systematic review
    Schmidt, Alexander
    Woestmann, Bernd
    Schlenz, Maximiliane Amelie
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2022, 33 (06) : 573 - 585
  • [30] Accuracy of a milled digital implant surgical guide: An in vitro study
    Liu, Xiaoqian
    Liu, Jianzhang
    Feng, Hailan
    Pan, Shaoxia
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2022, 127 (03): : 453 - 461