THE ACCURACY OF IMPLANT IMPRESSIONS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

被引:248
|
作者
Lee, Heeje [1 ]
So, Joseph S. [1 ]
Hochstedler, J. L. [2 ]
Ercoli, Carlo [3 ]
机构
[1] Louisiana State Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Prosthodont, New Orleans, LA 70119 USA
[2] Louisiana State Univ, Sch Dent, Adv Educ Program Prosthodont & Maxillofacial Pros, New Orleans, LA 70119 USA
[3] Univ Rochester, Eastman Dent Ctr, Div Prosthodont, Rochester, NY USA
来源
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY | 2008年 / 100卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60208-5
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Statement of problem. Various implant impression techniques, such as the splint, pick-up, and transfer techniques, have been introduced, and some techniques may be more accurate than others. Also, clinically, some factors, including the angulation or depth of implants, may affect the accuracy of the implant impressions. Purpose. The purposes of this review were to: (1) investigate the accuracy of published implant impression techniques, and (2) examine the clinical factors affecting implant impression accuracy. Material and methods. An electronic search was performed in June 2008 of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases with the key words implant, implants, impression, and impressions. To be included, the study had to investigate the accuracy of implant impressions and be published in an English peer-reviewed journal. In addition, a hand search was performed to enrich the results for the time period from January 1980 to May 2008. After executing the search strategies, 41 articles were selected to be included in the review process. Results. All of the selected articles were in vitro studies. Of the 17 studies that compared the accuracy between the splint and nonsplint techniques, 7 advocated the splint technique, 3 advocated the nonsplint technique, and 7 reported no difference. Fourteen studies compared the accuracy of pick-up and transfer impression techniques, and 5 showed more accurate impression with the pick-up techniques, 2 with the transfer technique, and 7 showed no difference. The number of implants affected the comparison of the pick-up and splint techniques. Eleven studies compared the accuracy of polyether and vinyl polysiloxane (VPS), and 10 of 1 1 reported no difference between the 2 materials. Four studies examined the effect of implant angulation on the accuracy of impressions. Two studies reported higher accuracy with straight implants, while the other 2 reported there was no angulation effect. Conclusions. The review of abutment level or implant level internal connection implants indicated that more studies reported greater accuracy with the splint technique than with the nonsplint technique. For situations in which there were 3 or fewer implants, most studies showed no difference between the pick-up and transfer techniques, whereas for 4 or more implants, more studies showed higher accuracy with the pick-up technique. Polyether and VPS were the recommended materials for the implant impressions. (J Prosthet Dent 2008;100:285-291)
引用
下载
收藏
页码:285 / 291
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Accuracy of digital implant impressions in clinical studies: A systematic review
    Schmidt, Alexander
    Woestmann, Bernd
    Schlenz, Maximiliane Amelie
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2022, 33 (06) : 573 - 585
  • [2] Accuracy of Implant Impressions for Partially and Completely Edentulous Patients: A Systematic Review
    Papaspyridakos, Panos
    Chen, Chun-Jung
    Gallucci, German O.
    Doukoudakis, Asterios
    Weber, Hans-Peter
    Chronopoulos, Vasilios
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2014, 29 (04) : 836 - +
  • [3] Accuracy of digital implant impressions with intraoral scanners. A systematic review
    Rutkunas, Vygandas
    Geciauskaite, Agne
    Jegelevicius, Darius
    Vaitiekunas, Mantas
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2017, 10 : 101 - 120
  • [4] Accuracy of Impressions of Multiple Implants in the Edentulous Arch: A Systematic Review
    Baig, Mirza Rustum
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2014, 29 (04) : 869 - 880
  • [5] Accuracy of full-arch digital implant impressions taken using intraoral scanners and related variables: A systematic review
    Zhang, Yi-Jie
    Shi, Jun-Yu
    Qian, Shu-Jiao
    Qiao, Shi-Chong
    Lai, Hong-Chang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2021, 14 (02) : 157 - 179
  • [6] Accuracy of digital implant impressions obtained using intraoral scanners: a systematic review and meta-analysis of in vivo studies
    Ma, Jie
    Zhang, Binghua
    Song, Hao
    Wu, Dongle
    Song, Tao
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2023, 9 (01)
  • [7] Accuracy of digital implant impressions obtained using intraoral scanners: a systematic review and meta-analysis of in vivo studies
    Jie Ma
    Binghua Zhang
    Hao Song
    Dongle Wu
    Tao Song
    International Journal of Implant Dentistry, 9
  • [8] Effect of Arch Size and Implant Angulations on the Accuracy of Implant Impressions
    Rezaei, Susan Mirmohammad
    Geramipanah, Farideh
    Kamali, Hadi
    Sadighpour, Leyla
    Payaminia, Leila
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2021, 29 (04): : 218 - 222
  • [9] Accuracy of digital versus conventional implant impressions
    Lee, Sang J.
    Betensky, Rebecca A.
    Gianneschi, Grace E.
    Gallucci, German O.
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2015, 26 (06) : 715 - 719
  • [10] Digital Implant Impression Technique Accuracy: A Systematic Review
    Alikhasi, Marzieh
    Alsharbaty, Mohammed Hussein M.
    Moharrami, Mohammad
    IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2017, 26 (06) : 929 - 935