THE ACCURACY OF IMPLANT IMPRESSIONS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

被引:248
|
作者
Lee, Heeje [1 ]
So, Joseph S. [1 ]
Hochstedler, J. L. [2 ]
Ercoli, Carlo [3 ]
机构
[1] Louisiana State Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Prosthodont, New Orleans, LA 70119 USA
[2] Louisiana State Univ, Sch Dent, Adv Educ Program Prosthodont & Maxillofacial Pros, New Orleans, LA 70119 USA
[3] Univ Rochester, Eastman Dent Ctr, Div Prosthodont, Rochester, NY USA
来源
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY | 2008年 / 100卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60208-5
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Statement of problem. Various implant impression techniques, such as the splint, pick-up, and transfer techniques, have been introduced, and some techniques may be more accurate than others. Also, clinically, some factors, including the angulation or depth of implants, may affect the accuracy of the implant impressions. Purpose. The purposes of this review were to: (1) investigate the accuracy of published implant impression techniques, and (2) examine the clinical factors affecting implant impression accuracy. Material and methods. An electronic search was performed in June 2008 of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases with the key words implant, implants, impression, and impressions. To be included, the study had to investigate the accuracy of implant impressions and be published in an English peer-reviewed journal. In addition, a hand search was performed to enrich the results for the time period from January 1980 to May 2008. After executing the search strategies, 41 articles were selected to be included in the review process. Results. All of the selected articles were in vitro studies. Of the 17 studies that compared the accuracy between the splint and nonsplint techniques, 7 advocated the splint technique, 3 advocated the nonsplint technique, and 7 reported no difference. Fourteen studies compared the accuracy of pick-up and transfer impression techniques, and 5 showed more accurate impression with the pick-up techniques, 2 with the transfer technique, and 7 showed no difference. The number of implants affected the comparison of the pick-up and splint techniques. Eleven studies compared the accuracy of polyether and vinyl polysiloxane (VPS), and 10 of 1 1 reported no difference between the 2 materials. Four studies examined the effect of implant angulation on the accuracy of impressions. Two studies reported higher accuracy with straight implants, while the other 2 reported there was no angulation effect. Conclusions. The review of abutment level or implant level internal connection implants indicated that more studies reported greater accuracy with the splint technique than with the nonsplint technique. For situations in which there were 3 or fewer implants, most studies showed no difference between the pick-up and transfer techniques, whereas for 4 or more implants, more studies showed higher accuracy with the pick-up technique. Polyether and VPS were the recommended materials for the implant impressions. (J Prosthet Dent 2008;100:285-291)
引用
下载
收藏
页码:285 / 291
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Accuracy of impression scanning compared with stone casts of implant impressions
    Matta, Ragai Edward
    Adler, Werner
    Wichmann, Manfred
    Heckmann, Siegfried Martin
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2017, 117 (04): : 507 - 512
  • [22] Comparison of the Clinical Accuracy of Digital and Conventional Dental Implant Impressions
    Rutkunas, Vygandas
    Gedrimiene, Agne
    Adaskevicius, Rimas
    Husain, Nadin Al-Haj
    Ozcan, Mutlu
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2020, 28 (04): : 173 - 181
  • [23] Accuracy of Digital Impressions at Varying Implant Depths: An In Vitro Study
    Sequeira, Vivia
    Harper, Matthew T.
    Lilly, Christa L.
    Bryington, Matthew S.
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2023, 32 (01): : 54 - 61
  • [24] Influence of impression technique and material on the accuracy of multiple implant impressions
    Woestmann, Bernd
    Rehmann, Peter
    Balkenhol, Markus
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2008, 21 (04) : 299 - 301
  • [25] Accuracy of Implant Impressions with Different Impression Coping Types and Shapes
    Rashidan, Nayereh
    Alikhasi, Marzieh
    Samadizadeh, Samad
    Beyabanaki, Elahe
    Kharazifard, Mohammad Javad
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2012, 14 (02) : 218 - 225
  • [26] AN IN VITRO COMPARISON OF THE ACCURACY OF IMPLANT IMPRESSIONS WITH CODED HEALING ABUTMENTS AND DIFFERENT IMPLANT ANGULATIONS
    Al-Abdullah, Khaled
    Zandparsa, Roya
    Finkelman, Matthew
    Hirayama, Hiroshi
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2013, 110 (02): : 90 - 100
  • [27] Validation of Digital Impressions' Accuracy Obtained Using Intraoral and Extraoral Scanners: A Systematic Review
    Shah, Naisargi
    Thakur, Mrinmyaee
    Gill, Shruti
    Shetty, Omkar
    Alqahtani, Nasser M.
    Al-Qarni, Mohammed A.
    Alqahtani, Saeed M.
    Elagib, Mohamed Fadul A.
    Chaturvedi, Saurabh
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (18)
  • [28] In Vitro Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Digital Implant Impressions: The Effect of Implant Angulation
    Chia, Vanessa A.
    Esguerra, Roxanna J.
    Teoh, Khim Hean
    Teo, Juin Wei
    Wong, Keng Mun
    Tan, Keson B.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2017, 32 (02) : 313 - 321
  • [29] Assessment of intraoral scanning technology for multiple implant impressions - A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kachhara, Saloni
    Nallaswamy, Deepak
    Ganapathy, Dhanraj M.
    Sivaswamy, Vinay
    Rajaraman, Vaishnavi
    JOURNAL OF INDIAN PROSTHODONTIC SOCIETY, 2020, 20 (02): : 141 - 152
  • [30] Digital Impressions Versus Conventional Impressions in Prosthodontics: A Systematic Review
    Ahmed, Suhael
    Hawsah, Abeer
    Rustom, Randa
    Alamri, Abeer
    Althomairy, Sameer
    Alenezi, Maha
    Shaker, Sarah
    Alrawsaa, Faisal
    Althumairy, Ahmed
    Alteraigi, Abdullah
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (01)