Accuracy of Digital Impressions at Varying Implant Depths: An In Vitro Study

被引:16
|
作者
Sequeira, Vivia [1 ]
Harper, Matthew T. [1 ]
Lilly, Christa L. [2 ]
Bryington, Matthew S. [1 ]
机构
[1] West Virginia Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Restorat Dent, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA
[2] West Virginia Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Sch Publ Hlth, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA
关键词
CAD-CAM; implant-supported prosthesis; Intraoral scan body; Intraoral scanner; DENTAL IMPRESSIONS; SCAN BODIES; TECHNOLOGY; PRECISION; COMPLICATIONS; LIGHT; TIME;
D O I
10.1111/jopr.13496
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose Implants placed at variable depths may vary the amount of visible scannable surface of a scan body. Intraoral scanner technology uses advanced optical principles to record the surface of the scan body to accurately capture the implant position. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect implant placement depth has on the accuracy of digital implant impressions using an intraoral scanner. Materials and methods A partially edentulous gypsum master model was fabricated to allow the positioning of a single implant analog at different depths. Four groups were created based on the planned implant depths of 7, 6, 3, and 0 mm and corresponding visibility of the scan body at 2, 3, 6, and 9 mm. The model was digitized with a laboratory scanner for the reference scan and with an intraoral scanner to generate 15 test scans per group, with a total of 60 scans. The test scans were superimposed onto the reference scan using the best fit algorithm to analyze and measure the positional (dXYZ) and angular deviation (d ⍬) of the scan body using three-dimensional metrology software. Statistical analysis was performed using a one-way ANOVA and pairwise comparison was done with a Tukey-Kramer HSD test (alpha = 0.05). Results The one-way ANOVA of the groups for the dXYZ and d theta parameters was statistically significant (F-3,F-56 = 11.45, p < 0.001, F-3,F-56 = 24.04, p < 0.001). Group D (9 mm) showed the least positional deviation at 38.41 mu m (95% CI 30.26; 46.56) and the least angular deviation of 0.17 degrees (95% CI 0.12; 0.21). Group A (2 mm) showed the greatest positional deviation of 77.17 mu m (95% CI 65.23; 89.11) and greatest angular deviation of 0.84 degrees (95% CI 0.65; 1.03). The positional and angular deviation increased with increased implant depth. Conclusions The accuracy of digital impressions is influenced by the implant depth and the amount of visibility of the scan body. The trueness and precision are highest when the implant is placed at 0 mm depth with complete visibility of the scan body and decreases with subgingival implant placement.
引用
收藏
页码:54 / 61
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Could various angulated implant depths affect the positional accuracy of digital impressions? An in vitro study
    Taghva, Masumeh
    Mosaddad, Seyed Ali
    Ansarifard, Elham
    Sadeghi, Mohsen
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2024, 33 (08): : 791 - 800
  • [2] Effect of cut-out rescanning protocol on the accuracy of digital impressions in convergent implants positioned at varying depths: An in vitro study
    Ansarifard, Elham
    Mosaddad, Seyed Ali
    Zabihi, Mohammad
    Taghva, Masumeh
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2024, 150
  • [3] Influence of intraoral scanning coverage on the accuracy of digital implant impressions - An in vitro study
    Wang, Zhen-yu
    Gong, Yu
    Liu, Fei
    Chen, Du
    Shen, Jie-fei
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2024, 143
  • [4] Accuracy of digital impressions versus conventional impressions for 2 implants: an in vitro study evaluating the effect of implant angulation
    Abduo, Jaafar
    Palamara, Joseph E. A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2021, 7 (01)
  • [5] Accuracy of digital impressions versus conventional impressions for 2 implants: an in vitro study evaluating the effect of implant angulation
    Jaafar Abduo
    Joseph E. A. Palamara
    International Journal of Implant Dentistry, 7
  • [6] In vitro and in vivo accuracy of full-arch digital implant impressions
    Rutkunas, Vygandas
    Gedrimiene, Agne
    Akulauskas, Mykolas
    Fehmer, Vincent
    Sailer, Irena
    Jegelevicius, Darius
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2021, 32 (12) : 1444 - 1454
  • [7] In Vitro Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Digital Implant Impressions: The Effect of Implant Angulation
    Chia, Vanessa A.
    Esguerra, Roxanna J.
    Teoh, Khim Hean
    Teo, Juin Wei
    Wong, Keng Mun
    Tan, Keson B.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2017, 32 (02) : 313 - 321
  • [8] Accuracy of printed casts generated from digital implant impressions versus stone casts from conventional implant impressions: A comparative in vitro study
    Alshawaf, Bahaa
    Weber, Hans-Peter
    Finkelman, Matthew
    El Rafie, Khaled
    Kudara, Yukio
    Papaspyridakos, Panos
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2018, 29 (08) : 835 - 842
  • [9] The Accuracy of Digital Implant Impressions when Using and Varying the Material and Diameter of the Dental Implant Scan Bodies
    Althubaitiy, Ramzi
    Sambrook, Raelene
    Weisbloom, Michael
    Petridis, Haralampos
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2022, 30 (04): : 305 - 313
  • [10] Effect of impression coping and implant angulation on the accuracy of implant impressions: an in vitro study
    Jo, Si-Hoon
    Kim, Kyoung-Ii
    Seo, Jae-Min
    Song, Kwang-Yeob
    Park, Ju-Mi
    Ahn, Seung-Geun
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED PROSTHODONTICS, 2010, 2 (04): : 128 - 133