Effect of novel prefabricated auxiliary devices attaching to scan bodies on the accuracy of intraoral scanning of complete-arch with multiple implants: An in-vitro study

被引:6
|
作者
Wu, Hio Kuan [1 ]
Wang, Jing [2 ]
Chen, Guanhui [3 ]
Huang, Xiaoqiong [1 ]
Deng, Feilong [1 ,4 ]
Li, Yiming [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat sen Univ, Hosp Stomatol, Guanghua Sch Stomatol, Guangdong Prov Key Lab Stomatol, Guangzhou 510055, Peoples R China
[2] YangHe Dent Clin, Guangzhou 510055, Peoples R China
[3] Sun Yat sen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 7, Dept Stomatol, Shenzhen 518107, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[4] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Hosp Stomatol, Guanghua Sch Stomatol, Guangdong Prov Key Lab Stomatol, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Accuracy; Dental implant; Digital impression; Intraoral scanner; Scan body; Edentulous; PROSTHESES; PRECISION; JAW;
D O I
10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104702
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: To examine the effect of novel prefabricated auxiliary devices with different geometric features called Scan Body Clasp (SBC) at different levels on the accuracy of intraoral scanning of complete-arch with multiple implants.Methods: An edentulous maxilla 4-implant model and SBCs with different geometric features (flat or curved) were fabricated by a 3D printer (AccuFab-C1s, 3DShining, Hangzhou, China). Test scans were performed using an intraoral scanner (Aoralscan 3, 3DShining, Hangzhou, China) software version 1.0.0.3104 under different sce-narios: group A (CO), without any SBCs; group B&C (LC&HC), with curved SBCs adjacent to and away from the mucosa; group D&E (LF&HF), with flat SBCs adjacent to and away from the mucosa. 20 scans were done for each group (CO, LC, HC, LF and HF). Reference Scans were obtained by digitizing the model in group A using a dental laboratory scanner (D2000, 3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark). The related files were imported into inspection software for trueness and precision assessment. Statistical analysis was performed with One-way ANOVA, Independent-Sample T test for trueness values. Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney test were used to assess the precision values. The level of significance was set at alpha=0.05.Results: Groups with SBCs demonstrated trueness enhancement, among which LF revealed the best trueness. Significant differences were also found between LF and HC (p < .01), LF and HF (p < .001), LC and HF (p < .01). LF and HF showed precision enhancement. The best precision was LF, which was found to be more precise than LC (p < .001) and HC (p < .001). HF was more precise than LC (p < .001) and HC (p < .001).Conclusions: Attaching the scan bodies with SBCs at different levels significantly influenced the scanning accu-racy. The SBCs near the mucosa result in superior trueness, while the flat morphology benefits the precision. Clinical significance: The results demonstrated the feasibility of the SBCs in enhancing intraoral complete-arch implant scanning accuracy. Among the configurations tested in the present study, low-level and flat surfaces of the artificial landmarks may be the potential pivotal elements to optimizing long-span scanning accuracy.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] Effect of artificial landmarks of the prefabricated auxiliary devices located at different arch positions on the accuracy of complete-arch edentulous digital implant scanning: An in-vitro study
    Wu, Hio Kuan
    Chen, Guanhui
    Zhang, Zhengchuan
    Lin, Xiaoxuan
    Huang, Xiaoqiong
    Deng, Feilong
    Li, Yiming
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2024, 140
  • [2] Effect of prefabricated auxiliary devices and scanning patterns on the accuracy of complete-arch implant digital impressions
    Wu, Hio Kuan
    Chen, Guanhui
    Wang, Jing
    Zhang, Zhengchuan
    Huang, Xiaoqiong
    Lin, Xiaoxuan
    Deng, Feilong
    Li, Yiming
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2024, 140
  • [3] A novel post-processing strategy to improve the accuracy of complete-arch intraoral scanning for implants: an in vitro study
    Pan, Yu
    Dai, Xuanyi
    Wan, Fang
    Song, Chaoyang
    Tsoi, James K. H.
    Pow, Edmond H. N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2023, 139
  • [4] Complete-Arch Accuracy of Four Intraoral Scanners: An In Vitro Study
    Celeghin, Giordano
    Franceschetti, Giulio
    Mobilio, Nicola
    Fasiol, Alberto
    Catapano, Santo
    Corsalini, Massimo
    Grande, Francesco
    [J]. HEALTHCARE, 2021, 9 (03)
  • [5] Effect of splinting scan bodies on trueness of complete-arch implant impression using different intraoral scanners: an in vitro study
    Retana, Luciano
    Nejat, Amir H.
    Pozzi, Alessandro
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTERIZED DENTISTRY, 2023, 26 (01) : 19 - 28
  • [6] Accuracy of intraoral optical scan versus stereophotogrammetry for complete-arch digital implant impression: An in vitro study
    Pozzi, Alessandro
    Agliardi, Enrico
    Lio, Fabrizio
    Nagy, Katalin
    Nardi, Alessandra
    Arcuri, Lorenzo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTIC RESEARCH, 2024, 68 (01) : 172 - 180
  • [7] Reproducibility of laboratory scanning of multiple implants in complete edentulous arch: Effect of scan bodies
    Pan, Yu
    Tam, Juliana M. Y.
    Tsoi, James K. H.
    Lam, Walter Y. H.
    Pow, Edmond H. N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2020, 96
  • [8] Impact of different scanning strategies on the accuracy of two current intraoral scanning systems in complete-arch impressions: an in vitro study
    Passos, Leandro
    Meiga, Sergio
    Brigagao, Vinicius
    Street, Alexandre
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTERIZED DENTISTRY, 2019, 22 (04) : 307 - 319
  • [9] Accuracy of Complete-Arch Implant Digital Scans: Effect of Scanning Protocol, Number of Implants, and Scan Body Splinting
    Denneulin, Thomas
    Rignon-Bret, Christophe
    Ravalec, Guy
    Tapie, Laurent
    Bouter, Denis
    Wulfman, Claudine
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2023, 36 (02) : 219 - 227
  • [10] Accuracy of complete-arch model using an intraoral video scanner: An in vitro study
    Jeong, Ii-Do
    Lee, Jae-Jun
    Jeon, Jin-Hun
    Kim, Ji-Hwan
    Kim, Hae-Young
    Kim, Woong-Chul
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2016, 115 (06): : 755 - 759