Continuous glucose monitoring-based time-in-range using insulin glargine 300 units/ml versus insulin degludec 100 units/ml in type 1 diabetes: The head-to-head randomized controlled InRange trial

被引:28
|
作者
Battelino, Tadej [1 ]
Danne, Thomas [2 ]
Edelman, Steve, V [3 ]
Choudhary, Pratik [4 ]
Renard, Eric [5 ]
Westerbacka, Jukka [6 ]
Mukherjee, Bhaswati [6 ]
Pilorget, Valerie [6 ]
Coudert, Mathieu [6 ]
Bergenstal, Richard M. [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ljubljana, UMC Univ Childrens Hosp, Fac Med, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
[2] Childrens & Youth Hosp Auf Der Bult, Diabet Ctr Children & Adolescents, Hannover, Germany
[3] Univ Calif San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[4] Univ Leicester, Diabet Res Ctr, Leicester, Leics, England
[5] Univ Montpellier, Montpellier Univ Hosp, Dept Endocrinol Diabet & Nutr, Montpellier, France
[6] Sanofi, Paris, France
[7] HealthPartners Inst, Int Diabet Ctr, Minneapolis, MN USA
来源
DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM | 2023年 / 25卷 / 02期
关键词
basal insulin; continuous glucose monitoring; glycaemic control; insulin analogues; randomized trial; type; 1; diabetes; GLYCEMIC CONTROL; HYPOGLYCEMIA; VARIABILITY; PROFILES; PROVIDES; ADULTS; WORLD; U/ML;
D O I
10.1111/dom.14898
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aim To use continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)-based time-in-range (TIR) as a primary efficacy endpoint to compare the second-generation basal insulin (BI) analogues insulin glargine 300 U/ml (Gla-300) and insulin degludec 100 U/ml (IDeg-100) in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Materials and Methods InRange was a 12-week, multicentre, randomized, active-controlled, parallel-group, open-label study comparing glucose TIR and variability between Gla-300 and IDeg-100 using blinded 20-day CGM profiles. The inclusion criteria consisted of adults with T1D treated with multiple daily injections, using BI once daily and rapid-acting insulin analogues for at least 1 year, with an HbA1c of 7% or higher and of 10% or less at screening. Results Overall, 343 participants were randomized: 172 received Gla-300 and 171 IDeg-100. Non-inferiority (10% relative margin) of Gla-300 versus IDeg-100 was shown for the primary endpoint (percentage TIR >= 70 to <= 180 mg/dl): least squares (LS) mean (95% confidence interval) 52.74% (51.06%, 54.42%) for Gla-300 and 55.09% (53.34%, 56.84%) for IDeg-100; LS mean difference (non-inferiority): 3.16% (0.88%, 5.44%) (non-inferiority P = .0067). Non-inferiority was shown on glucose total coefficient of variation (main secondary endpoint): LS mean 39.91% (39.20%, 40.61%) and 41.22% (40.49%, 41.95%), respectively; LS mean difference (non-inferiority) -5.44% (-6.50%, -4.38%) (non-inferiority P < .0001). Superiority of Gla-300 over IDeg-100 was not shown on TIR. Occurrences of self-measured and CGM-derived hypoglycaemia were comparable between treatment groups. Safety profiles were consistent with known profiles, with no unexpected findings. Conclusions Using clinically relevant CGM metrics, InRange shows that Gla-300 is non-inferior to IDeg-100 in people with T1D, with comparable hypoglycaemia and safety profiles.
引用
收藏
页码:545 / 555
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Efficacy and safety of insulin glargine 300 units/mL vs insulin degludec in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Alhmoud, Eman N.
    Saad, Mohamed Omar
    Omar, Nabil Elhadi
    FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2024, 14
  • [32] Efficacy and safety of basal insulin degludec 100 IU/mL versus glargine 300 IU/mL for type 1 diabetes: The single-center INEOX randomized controlled trial (vol 196, 110238, 2023)
    Ruiz-de-Adana, Maria-Soledad
    Dominguez, Marta-Elena
    Morillas, Virginia
    Colomo, Natalia
    Vallejo-Mora, Rosario
    Guerrero, Mercedes
    Garcia-Escobar, Eva
    Carreira, Monica
    Romero-Zerbo, Yanina
    Linares, Francisca
    Gonzalez-Mariscal, Isabel
    Bermudez-Silva, Francisco-Javier
    Olveira, Gabriel
    Rojo-Martinez, Gemma
    DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2024, 210
  • [33] New insulin glargine 300 U/ml versus glargine 100 U/ml in Japanese people with type 2 diabetes using basal insulin and oral antihyperglycaemic drugs: glucose control and hypoglycaemia in a randomized controlled trial (EDITION JP 2)
    Terauchi, Y.
    Koyama, M.
    Cheng, X.
    Takahashi, Y.
    Riddle, M. C.
    Bolli, G. B.
    Hirose, T.
    DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2016, 18 (04): : 366 - 374
  • [34] Effectiveness and Safety of Insulin Glargine 300 U/ml in Comparison with Insulin Degludec 100 U/ml Evaluated with Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes and Suboptimal Glycemic Control in Routine Clinical Practice: The OneCARE Study
    Ignacio Conget
    Miguel Ángel Mangas
    Cristóbal Morales
    Juan Caro
    Margarita Giménez
    Mireia Borrell
    Elías Delgado
    Diabetes Therapy, 2021, 12 : 2993 - 3009
  • [35] Effectiveness and Safety of Insulin Glargine 300 U/ml in Comparison with Insulin Degludec 100 U/ml Evaluated with Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes and Suboptimal Glycemic Control in Routine Clinical Practice: The OneCARE Study
    Conget, Ignacio
    Angel Mangas, Miguel
    Morales, Cristobal
    Caro, Juan
    Gimenez, Margarita
    Borrell, Mireia
    Delgado, Elias
    DIABETES THERAPY, 2021, 12 (11) : 2993 - 3009
  • [36] New insulin glargine 300 U/ml compared with glargine 100 U/ml in insulin-naive people with type 2 diabetes on oral glucose-lowering drugs: a randomized controlled trial (EDITION 3)
    Bolli, G. B.
    Riddle, M. C.
    Bergenstal, R. M.
    Ziemen, M.
    Sestakauskas, K.
    Goyeau, H.
    Home, P. D.
    DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2015, 17 (04): : 386 - 394
  • [37] Comparison of Insulin Glargine 300 U/mL and Insulin Degludec 100 U/mL Around Spontaneous Exercise Sessions in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized Cross-Over Trial (ULTRAFLEXI-1 Study)
    Moser, Othmar
    Mueller, Alexander
    Aberer, Felix
    Aziz, Faisal
    Kojzar, Harald
    Sourij, Caren
    Obermayer, Anna
    Abbas, Farah
    Birnbaumer, Philipp
    Lenz, Jacqueline
    Mursic, Ines
    Sternad, Christoph
    Hoenger, Lukas
    Ziko, Haris
    Pferschy, Peter N.
    Tripolt, Norbert
    Sourij, Harald
    DIABETES TECHNOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2023, 25 (03) : 161 - 168
  • [38] Continuous Glucose Monitoring During Basal–Bolus Therapy Using Insulin Glargine 300 U mL−1 and Glargine 100 U mL−1 in Japanese People with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: A Crossover Pilot Study
    Hideaki Jinnouchi
    Masayoshi Koyama
    Atsushi Amano
    Yoshinori Takahashi
    Akira Yoshida
    Kunio Hieshima
    Seigo Sugiyama
    Noboru Kurinami
    Tomio Jinnouchi
    Reinhard Becker
    Diabetes Therapy, 2015, 6 : 143 - 152
  • [39] Evaluation of Patient Reported Satisfaction and Clinical Efficacy of Insulin Glargine 300 U/mL Versus 100 U/mL in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes Using Flash Glucose Monitoring System
    Al Hayek, Ayman Abdullah
    Alwin Robert, Asirvatham
    Al Saeed, Abdulghani H.
    Al Dawish, Mohamed Abdulaziz
    CLINICAL MEDICINE INSIGHTS-ENDOCRINOLOGY AND DIABETES, 2022, 15
  • [40] An Exploratory Study to Evaluate the Glycemic Variability by Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) with Insulin Glargine 300 U/mL vs. Glargine 100 U/mL in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes
    Franco, Denise R.
    Visconti, Guilherme D.
    Feder, Cecilia
    Baptista, Juliana
    Vianna, Andre G.
    Guimaraes, Mariana T.
    Souza, Flavia V.
    Tagata, Luciana A.
    Eliaschewitz, Freddy
    DIABETES, 2020, 69