Continuous glucose monitoring-based time-in-range using insulin glargine 300 units/ml versus insulin degludec 100 units/ml in type 1 diabetes: The head-to-head randomized controlled InRange trial

被引:28
|
作者
Battelino, Tadej [1 ]
Danne, Thomas [2 ]
Edelman, Steve, V [3 ]
Choudhary, Pratik [4 ]
Renard, Eric [5 ]
Westerbacka, Jukka [6 ]
Mukherjee, Bhaswati [6 ]
Pilorget, Valerie [6 ]
Coudert, Mathieu [6 ]
Bergenstal, Richard M. [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ljubljana, UMC Univ Childrens Hosp, Fac Med, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
[2] Childrens & Youth Hosp Auf Der Bult, Diabet Ctr Children & Adolescents, Hannover, Germany
[3] Univ Calif San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[4] Univ Leicester, Diabet Res Ctr, Leicester, Leics, England
[5] Univ Montpellier, Montpellier Univ Hosp, Dept Endocrinol Diabet & Nutr, Montpellier, France
[6] Sanofi, Paris, France
[7] HealthPartners Inst, Int Diabet Ctr, Minneapolis, MN USA
来源
DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM | 2023年 / 25卷 / 02期
关键词
basal insulin; continuous glucose monitoring; glycaemic control; insulin analogues; randomized trial; type; 1; diabetes; GLYCEMIC CONTROL; HYPOGLYCEMIA; VARIABILITY; PROFILES; PROVIDES; ADULTS; WORLD; U/ML;
D O I
10.1111/dom.14898
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aim To use continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)-based time-in-range (TIR) as a primary efficacy endpoint to compare the second-generation basal insulin (BI) analogues insulin glargine 300 U/ml (Gla-300) and insulin degludec 100 U/ml (IDeg-100) in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Materials and Methods InRange was a 12-week, multicentre, randomized, active-controlled, parallel-group, open-label study comparing glucose TIR and variability between Gla-300 and IDeg-100 using blinded 20-day CGM profiles. The inclusion criteria consisted of adults with T1D treated with multiple daily injections, using BI once daily and rapid-acting insulin analogues for at least 1 year, with an HbA1c of 7% or higher and of 10% or less at screening. Results Overall, 343 participants were randomized: 172 received Gla-300 and 171 IDeg-100. Non-inferiority (10% relative margin) of Gla-300 versus IDeg-100 was shown for the primary endpoint (percentage TIR >= 70 to <= 180 mg/dl): least squares (LS) mean (95% confidence interval) 52.74% (51.06%, 54.42%) for Gla-300 and 55.09% (53.34%, 56.84%) for IDeg-100; LS mean difference (non-inferiority): 3.16% (0.88%, 5.44%) (non-inferiority P = .0067). Non-inferiority was shown on glucose total coefficient of variation (main secondary endpoint): LS mean 39.91% (39.20%, 40.61%) and 41.22% (40.49%, 41.95%), respectively; LS mean difference (non-inferiority) -5.44% (-6.50%, -4.38%) (non-inferiority P < .0001). Superiority of Gla-300 over IDeg-100 was not shown on TIR. Occurrences of self-measured and CGM-derived hypoglycaemia were comparable between treatment groups. Safety profiles were consistent with known profiles, with no unexpected findings. Conclusions Using clinically relevant CGM metrics, InRange shows that Gla-300 is non-inferior to IDeg-100 in people with T1D, with comparable hypoglycaemia and safety profiles.
引用
收藏
页码:545 / 555
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The relationship between HbA1c and hypoglycaemia in patients with diabetes treated with insulin degludec versus insulin glargine 100 units/mL
    Jones, Karen L.
    Huynh, Lian Q.
    Hatzinikolas, Seva
    Rigda, Rachael S.
    Phillips, Liza K.
    Pham, Hung T.
    Marathe, Chinmay S.
    Wu, Tongzhi
    Malbert, Charles H.
    Stevens, Julie E.
    Lange, Kylie
    Rayner, Christopher K.
    Horowitz, Michael
    DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2020, 22 (05): : 788 - 797
  • [22] Tertiary CGM endpoints comparing second-generation basal insulin analogues glargine 300 U/mL and degludec 100 U/mL in people with type 1 diabetes: inrange randomised controlled trial
    Bergenstal, R.
    Edelman, S.
    Choudhary, P.
    Danne, T.
    Renard, E.
    Westerbacka, J.
    Mukherjee, B.
    Picard, P.
    Pilorget, V.
    Battelino, T.
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2022, 65 (SUPPL 1) : S326 - S327
  • [23] Glucose Variability with Second-Generation Basal Insulin Analogs Glargine 300 U/mL and Degludec 100 U/mL, Evaluated by CGM in People with T1D-The InRange Randomized Controlled Trial
    Bergenstal, Richard M.
    Edelman, Steven
    Choudhary, Pratik
    Danne, Thomas
    Renard, Eric
    Westerbacka, Jukka
    Mukherjee, Bhaswati
    Picard, Pascaline
    Pilorget, Valerie
    Battelino, Tadej
    DIABETES, 2022, 71
  • [24] EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF INSULIN GLARGINE-300 U/ML VS INSULIN DEGLUDEC-100 U/ML IN INSULIN-NAIVE ADULTS WITH T2DM: FIRST HEAD-TO-HEAD RANDOMISED CLINICAL TRIAL
    Cheng, A.
    Rosenstock, J.
    Ritzel, R.
    Bosnyak, Z.
    Devisme, C.
    Wang, X.
    Sieber, J.
    Roussel, R.
    Bolli, G. B.
    DIABETES TECHNOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2018, 20 : A29 - A30
  • [25] TERTIARY CGM ENDPOINTS COMPARING SECONDGENERATION BASAL INSULIN ANALOGS GLARGINE 300 U/ML AND DEGLUDEC 100 U/ML IN PEOPLE WITH T1D: INRANGE RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
    Bergenstal, R.
    Edelman, S.
    Choudhary, P.
    Danne, T.
    Renard, E.
    Westerbacka, J.
    Mukherjee, B.
    Coudert, M.
    Pilorget, V.
    Battelino, T.
    DIABETES TECHNOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2023, 25 : A53 - A54
  • [26] Risk of hypoglycaemia with insulin degludec versus insulin glargine U300 in insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes: the randomised, head-to-head CONCLUDE trial
    Philis-Tsimikas, Athena
    Klonoff, David C.
    Khunti, Kamlesh
    Bajaj, Harpreet S.
    Leiter, Lawrence A.
    Hansen, Melissa, V
    Troelsen, Lone N.
    Ladelund, Steen
    Heller, Simon
    Pieber, Thomas R.
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2020, 63 (04) : 698 - 710
  • [27] Risk of hypoglycaemia with insulin degludec versus insulin glargine U300 in insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes: the randomised, head-to-head CONCLUDE trial
    Athena Philis-Tsimikas
    David C. Klonoff
    Kamlesh Khunti
    Harpreet S. Bajaj
    Lawrence A. Leiter
    Melissa V. Hansen
    Lone N. Troelsen
    Steen Ladelund
    Simon Heller
    Thomas R. Pieber
    Diabetologia, 2020, 63 : 698 - 710
  • [28] Efficacy and safety of insulin glargine 300 U/mL versus insulin glargine 100 U/mL in Asia Pacific insulin-naive people with type 2 diabetes: The EDITION AP randomized controlled trial
    Ji, Linong
    Kang, Eun Seok
    Dong, XiaoLin
    Li, Ling
    Yuan, GuoYue
    Shang, Shuhua
    Niemoeller, Elisabeth
    DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2020, 22 (04): : 612 - 621
  • [29] InRange: Comparison of the Second-Generation Basal Insulin Analogues Glargine 300 U/mL and Degludec 100 U/mL in Persons with Type 1 Diabetes Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring-Study Design (vol 11, pg 1017, 2020)
    Battelino, Tadej
    Bosnyak, Zsolt
    Danne, Thomas
    Mukherjee, Bhaswati
    Edelman, Steve
    Pilorget, Valerie
    Choudhary, Pratik
    Renard, Eric
    Bergenstal, Richard
    DIABETES THERAPY, 2020, 11 (08) : 1907 - 1908
  • [30] InRange: Comparison of the Second-Generation Basal Insulin Analogues Glargine 300 U/mL and Degludec 100 U/mL in Persons with Type 1 Diabetes Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring-Study Design (vol 11, pg 1017, 2020)
    Battelino, Tadej
    Bosnyak, Zsolt
    Danne, Thomas
    Mukherjee, Bhaswati
    Edelman, Steve
    Pilorget, Valerie
    Choudhary, Pratik
    Renard, Eric
    Bergenstal, Richard
    DIABETES THERAPY, 2020, 11 (07) : 1607 - 1608