Continuous glucose monitoring-based time-in-range using insulin glargine 300 units/ml versus insulin degludec 100 units/ml in type 1 diabetes: The head-to-head randomized controlled InRange trial

被引:28
|
作者
Battelino, Tadej [1 ]
Danne, Thomas [2 ]
Edelman, Steve, V [3 ]
Choudhary, Pratik [4 ]
Renard, Eric [5 ]
Westerbacka, Jukka [6 ]
Mukherjee, Bhaswati [6 ]
Pilorget, Valerie [6 ]
Coudert, Mathieu [6 ]
Bergenstal, Richard M. [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ljubljana, UMC Univ Childrens Hosp, Fac Med, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
[2] Childrens & Youth Hosp Auf Der Bult, Diabet Ctr Children & Adolescents, Hannover, Germany
[3] Univ Calif San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[4] Univ Leicester, Diabet Res Ctr, Leicester, Leics, England
[5] Univ Montpellier, Montpellier Univ Hosp, Dept Endocrinol Diabet & Nutr, Montpellier, France
[6] Sanofi, Paris, France
[7] HealthPartners Inst, Int Diabet Ctr, Minneapolis, MN USA
来源
DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM | 2023年 / 25卷 / 02期
关键词
basal insulin; continuous glucose monitoring; glycaemic control; insulin analogues; randomized trial; type; 1; diabetes; GLYCEMIC CONTROL; HYPOGLYCEMIA; VARIABILITY; PROFILES; PROVIDES; ADULTS; WORLD; U/ML;
D O I
10.1111/dom.14898
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aim To use continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)-based time-in-range (TIR) as a primary efficacy endpoint to compare the second-generation basal insulin (BI) analogues insulin glargine 300 U/ml (Gla-300) and insulin degludec 100 U/ml (IDeg-100) in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Materials and Methods InRange was a 12-week, multicentre, randomized, active-controlled, parallel-group, open-label study comparing glucose TIR and variability between Gla-300 and IDeg-100 using blinded 20-day CGM profiles. The inclusion criteria consisted of adults with T1D treated with multiple daily injections, using BI once daily and rapid-acting insulin analogues for at least 1 year, with an HbA1c of 7% or higher and of 10% or less at screening. Results Overall, 343 participants were randomized: 172 received Gla-300 and 171 IDeg-100. Non-inferiority (10% relative margin) of Gla-300 versus IDeg-100 was shown for the primary endpoint (percentage TIR >= 70 to <= 180 mg/dl): least squares (LS) mean (95% confidence interval) 52.74% (51.06%, 54.42%) for Gla-300 and 55.09% (53.34%, 56.84%) for IDeg-100; LS mean difference (non-inferiority): 3.16% (0.88%, 5.44%) (non-inferiority P = .0067). Non-inferiority was shown on glucose total coefficient of variation (main secondary endpoint): LS mean 39.91% (39.20%, 40.61%) and 41.22% (40.49%, 41.95%), respectively; LS mean difference (non-inferiority) -5.44% (-6.50%, -4.38%) (non-inferiority P < .0001). Superiority of Gla-300 over IDeg-100 was not shown on TIR. Occurrences of self-measured and CGM-derived hypoglycaemia were comparable between treatment groups. Safety profiles were consistent with known profiles, with no unexpected findings. Conclusions Using clinically relevant CGM metrics, InRange shows that Gla-300 is non-inferior to IDeg-100 in people with T1D, with comparable hypoglycaemia and safety profiles.
引用
收藏
页码:545 / 555
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Glargine 300 Units/mL (Gla-300) Versus Insulin Glargine 100 Units/mL (Gla-100) in Children and Adolescents (6-17 years) With Type 1 Diabetes: Results of the EDITION JUNIOR Randomized Controlled Trial
    Danne, Thomas
    Tamborlane, William V.
    Malievsky, Oleg A.
    Franco, Denise R.
    Kawamura, Tomoyuki
    Demissie, Marek
    Niemoeller, Elisabeth
    Goyeau, Harmonie
    Wardecki, Marek
    Battelino, Tadej
    DIABETES CARE, 2020, 43 (07) : 1512 - 1519
  • [12] Correction to: InRange: Comparison of the Second-Generation Basal Insulin Analogues Glargine 300 U/mL and Degludec 100 U/mL in Persons with Type 1 Diabetes Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring—Study Design
    Tadej Battelino
    Zsolt Bosnyak
    Thomas Danne
    Bhaswati Mukherjee
    Steve Edelman
    Valerie Pilorget
    Pratik Choudhary
    Eric Renard
    Richard Bergenstal
    Diabetes Therapy, 2020, 11 : 1907 - 1908
  • [13] Correction to: InRange: Comparison of the Second-Generation Basal Insulin Analogues Glargine 300 U/mL and Degludec 100 U/mL in Persons with Type 1 Diabetes Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring—Study Design
    Tadej Battelino
    Zsolt Bosnyak
    Thomas Danne
    Bhaswati Mukherjee
    Steve Edelman
    Valerie Pilorget
    Pratik Choudhary
    Eric Renard
    Richard Bergenstal
    Diabetes Therapy, 2020, 11 : 1607 - 1608
  • [14] InRange: Comparison of the Second-Generation Basal Insulin Analogues Glargine 300 U/mL and Degludec 100 U/mL in Persons with Type 1 Diabetes Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring-Study Design
    Battelino, Tadej
    Bosnyak, Zsolt
    Danne, Thomas
    Mukherjee, Bhaswati
    Edelman, Steve
    Pilorget, Valerie
    Choudhary, Pratik
    Renard, Eric
    Bergenstal, Richard
    DIABETES THERAPY, 2020, 11 (04) : 1017 - 1027
  • [15] New Insulin Glargine 300 Units/mL Versus Glargine 100 Units/mL in People With Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized, Phase 3a, Open-Label Clinical Trial (EDITION 4)
    Home, Philip D.
    Bergenstal, Richard M.
    Bolli, Geremia B.
    Ziemen, Monika
    Rojeski, Maria
    Espinasse, Melanie
    Riddle, Matthew C.
    DIABETES CARE, 2015, 38 (12) : 2217 - 2225
  • [16] COMPARISON OF SECOND-GENERATION BASAL INSULIN ANALOGUES GLARGINE 300 U/ML AND DEGLUDEC 100 U/ML USING CONTINUOUS GLUCOSE MONITORING IN PEOPLE WITH T1D: INRANGE RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL
    Battelino, T.
    Danne, T.
    Edelman, S.
    Choudhary, P.
    Renard, E.
    Westerbacka, J.
    Mukherjee, B.
    Picard, P.
    Pilorget, V.
    Bergenstal, R.
    DIABETES TECHNOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2022, 24 : A4 - A4
  • [17] An exploratory analysis of the cost-effectiveness of insulin glargine 300 units/mL versus insulin glargine 100 units/mL over a lifetime horizon using the BRAVO diabetes model
    Shao, Hui
    Shi, Lizheng
    Fonseca, Vivian
    Alsaleh, Abdul Jabbar Omar
    Gill, Jasvinder
    Nicholls, Charlie
    DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2024, 41 (05)
  • [18] Efficacy and safety of basal insulin degludec 100 IU/mL versus glargine 300 IU/mL for type 1 diabetes: The single-center INEOX randomized controlled trial
    de Adana, Maria Soledad Ruiz
    Dominguez, Marta Elena
    Morillas, Virginia
    Colomo, Natalia
    Vallejo-Mora, Rosario
    Guerrero, Mercedes
    Garcia-Escobar, Eva
    Carreira, Monica
    Romero-Zerbo, Yanina
    Linares, Francisca
    Gonzalez-Mariscal, Isabel
    Bermudez-Silva, Francisco Javier
    Olveira, Gabriel
    Rojo-Martinez, Gemma
    DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2023, 196
  • [19] BUDGET IMPACT MODEL FOR INSULIN GLARGINE-300U/ ML (GLA-300) VS INSULIN DEGLUDEC 100 U/ML IN THE TREATMENT OF TYPE 1 DIABETES MELLITUS BASED ON THE INRANGE STUDY
    Safia, M.
    Hachelaf, Z.
    Aissaoui, A.
    Mahieu, A.
    Jabbar, O. A. Abdul
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2024, 27 (12)
  • [20] New insulin glargine 300 U/ml versus glargine 100 U/ml in Japanese adults with type 1 diabetes using basal and mealtime insulin: glucose control and hypoglycaemia in a randomized controlled trial (EDITION JP 1)
    Matsuhisa, M.
    Koyama, M.
    Cheng, X.
    Takahashi, Y.
    Riddle, M. C.
    Bolli, G. B.
    Hirose, T.
    DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2016, 18 (04): : 375 - 383