New insulin glargine 300 U/ml versus glargine 100 U/ml in Japanese adults with type 1 diabetes using basal and mealtime insulin: glucose control and hypoglycaemia in a randomized controlled trial (EDITION JP 1)

被引:73
|
作者
Matsuhisa, M. [1 ]
Koyama, M. [2 ]
Cheng, X. [3 ]
Takahashi, Y. [2 ]
Riddle, M. C. [4 ]
Bolli, G. B. [5 ]
Hirose, T. [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tokushima, Tokushima 7708503, Japan
[2] Sanofi, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Sanofi, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[5] Univ Perugia, Sch Med, I-06100 Perugia, Italy
[6] Toho Univ, Sch Med, Tokyo, Japan
来源
DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM | 2016年 / 18卷 / 04期
关键词
basal insulin; glycaemic control; insulin analogues; phase III study; randomised trial; type; 1; diabetes; GLYCEMIC CONTROL; PEOPLE; MELLITUS; DEGLUDEC; MANAGEMENT; EFFICACY; PROVIDES; UNITS/ML;
D O I
10.1111/dom.12619
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aim: To compare efficacy and safety of new insulin glargine 300 U/ml (Gla-300) with that of insulin glargine 100 U/ml (Gla-100) in Japanese adults with type 1 diabetes. Methods: The EDITION JP 1 study (NCT01689129) was a 6-month, multicentre, open-label, phase III study. Participants (n=243) were randomized to Gla-300 or Gla-100 while continuing mealtime insulin. Basal insulin was titrated with the aim of achieving a fasting self-monitored plasma glucose target of 4.4-7.2 mmol/l. The primary endpoint was change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) over 6months. Safety measures included hypoglycaemia and change in body weight. Results: Gla-300 was non-inferior to Gla-100 for the primary endpoint of HbA1c change over the 6-month period {least squares [LS] mean difference 0.13% [95 % confidence interval (CI) -0.03 to 0.29]}. The annualized rate of confirmed (<= 3.9 mmol/l) or severe hypoglycaemic events was 34 % lower with Gla-300 than with Gla-100 at night [rate ratio 0.66 (95% CI 0.48-0.92)] and 20% lower at any time of day [24 h; rate ratio 0.80 (95% CI 0.65-0.98)]; this difference was most pronounced during the first 8 weeks of treatment. Severe hypoglycaemia was infrequent. The basal insulin dose increased in both groups (month 6 dose: Gla-300 0.35 U/kg/day, Gla-100 0.29 U/kg/day). A between-treatment difference in body weight change over 6months favouring Gla-300 was observed [LS mean difference -0.6 kg (95 % CI -1.1 to -0.0); p=0.035]. Adverse event rates were comparable between the groups. Conclusions: In Japanese adults with type 1 diabetes using basal plus mealtime insulin, less hypoglycaemia was observed with Gla-300 than with Gla-100, particularly during the night, while glycaemic control did not differ.
引用
收藏
页码:375 / 383
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] New insulin glargine 300 U/ml versus glargine 100 U/ml in Japanese people with type 2 diabetes using basal insulin and oral antihyperglycaemic drugs: glucose control and hypoglycaemia in a randomized controlled trial (EDITION JP 2)
    Terauchi, Y.
    Koyama, M.
    Cheng, X.
    Takahashi, Y.
    Riddle, M. C.
    Bolli, G. B.
    Hirose, T.
    DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2016, 18 (04): : 366 - 374
  • [2] New insulin glargine 300 U/mL: glycaemic control and hypoglycaemia in Japanese people with type 1 diabetes mellitus (EDITION JP 1)
    Matsuhisa, M.
    Koyama, M.
    Cheng, X.
    Shimizu, S.
    Hirose, T.
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2014, 57 : S400 - S400
  • [3] Low Blood Glucose Index and Hypoglycaemia Risk: Insulin Glargine 300 U/mL Versus Insulin Glargine 100 U/mL in Type 2 Diabetes
    Kovatchev, Boris
    Meng, Zhaoling
    Cali, Anna M. G.
    Perfetti, Riccardo
    Breton, Marc D.
    DIABETES THERAPY, 2020, 11 (06) : 1293 - 1302
  • [4] Low Blood Glucose Index and Hypoglycaemia Risk: Insulin Glargine 300 U/mL Versus Insulin Glargine 100 U/mL in Type 2 Diabetes
    Boris Kovatchev
    Zhaoling Meng
    Anna M. G. Cali
    Riccardo Perfetti
    Marc D. Breton
    Diabetes Therapy, 2020, 11 : 1293 - 1302
  • [5] Sustained glycaemic control and less hypoglycaemia with new insulin glargine 300 U/ml vs 100 U/ml: 1-year results in type 2 diabetes with basal and mealtime insulin (EDITION 1)
    Riddle, M. C.
    Yki-Jaervinen, H.
    Bolli, G. B.
    Ziemen, M.
    Muehlen-Bartmer, I.
    Cissokho, S.
    Home, P. D.
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2014, 57 : S402 - S402
  • [6] New Insulin Glargine 300 Units/mL Versus Glargine 100 Units/mL in People With Type 2 Diabetes Using Basal and Mealtime Insulin: Glucose Control and Hypoglycemia in a 6-Month Randomized Controlled Trial (EDITION 1)
    Riddle, Matthew C.
    Bolli, Geremia B.
    Ziemen, Monika
    Muehlen-Bartmer, Isabel
    Bizet, Florence
    Home, Philip D.
    DIABETES CARE, 2014, 37 (10) : 2755 - 2762
  • [7] Glycaemic variability and risk for hypoglycaemia on insulin glargine 300 U/ml versus insulin glargine 100 U/ml in people with type 2 diabetes
    Kovatchev, B.
    Meng, Z.
    Breton, M.
    Leroy, B.
    Cali, A.
    Perfetti, R.
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2017, 60 : S36 - S37
  • [8] Sustained glycaemic control and less nocturnal hypoglycaemia with new insulin glargine 300 U/ml versus glargine 100 U/ml over 1 year in Japanese people with type 1 diabetes mellitus
    Matsuhisa, M.
    Koyama, M.
    Cheng, X.
    Sumi, M.
    Hirose, T.
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2015, 58 : S2 - S3
  • [9] Improved Glycemic Control with Insulin Glargine 300 U/mL vs. Glargine 100 U/mL in Type 1 Diabetes
    Paola, Lucidi
    Cioli, Patrizia
    Candeloro, Paola
    Andreoli, Anna Marinelli
    Bolli, Geremia B.
    Fanelli, Carmine G.
    Porcellati, Francesca
    DIABETES, 2020, 69
  • [10] Glycaemic control and hypoglycaemia with new insulin glargine 300 U/mL in people with type 1 diabetes (EDITION 4)
    Home, P. D.
    Bergenstal, R. M.
    Riddle, M. C.
    Ziemen, M.
    Rojeski, M.
    Espinasse, M.
    Bolli, G. B.
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2014, 57 : S69 - S70