Continuous glucose monitoring-based time-in-range using insulin glargine 300 units/ml versus insulin degludec 100 units/ml in type 1 diabetes: The head-to-head randomized controlled InRange trial

被引:28
|
作者
Battelino, Tadej [1 ]
Danne, Thomas [2 ]
Edelman, Steve, V [3 ]
Choudhary, Pratik [4 ]
Renard, Eric [5 ]
Westerbacka, Jukka [6 ]
Mukherjee, Bhaswati [6 ]
Pilorget, Valerie [6 ]
Coudert, Mathieu [6 ]
Bergenstal, Richard M. [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ljubljana, UMC Univ Childrens Hosp, Fac Med, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
[2] Childrens & Youth Hosp Auf Der Bult, Diabet Ctr Children & Adolescents, Hannover, Germany
[3] Univ Calif San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[4] Univ Leicester, Diabet Res Ctr, Leicester, Leics, England
[5] Univ Montpellier, Montpellier Univ Hosp, Dept Endocrinol Diabet & Nutr, Montpellier, France
[6] Sanofi, Paris, France
[7] HealthPartners Inst, Int Diabet Ctr, Minneapolis, MN USA
来源
DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM | 2023年 / 25卷 / 02期
关键词
basal insulin; continuous glucose monitoring; glycaemic control; insulin analogues; randomized trial; type; 1; diabetes; GLYCEMIC CONTROL; HYPOGLYCEMIA; VARIABILITY; PROFILES; PROVIDES; ADULTS; WORLD; U/ML;
D O I
10.1111/dom.14898
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aim To use continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)-based time-in-range (TIR) as a primary efficacy endpoint to compare the second-generation basal insulin (BI) analogues insulin glargine 300 U/ml (Gla-300) and insulin degludec 100 U/ml (IDeg-100) in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Materials and Methods InRange was a 12-week, multicentre, randomized, active-controlled, parallel-group, open-label study comparing glucose TIR and variability between Gla-300 and IDeg-100 using blinded 20-day CGM profiles. The inclusion criteria consisted of adults with T1D treated with multiple daily injections, using BI once daily and rapid-acting insulin analogues for at least 1 year, with an HbA1c of 7% or higher and of 10% or less at screening. Results Overall, 343 participants were randomized: 172 received Gla-300 and 171 IDeg-100. Non-inferiority (10% relative margin) of Gla-300 versus IDeg-100 was shown for the primary endpoint (percentage TIR >= 70 to <= 180 mg/dl): least squares (LS) mean (95% confidence interval) 52.74% (51.06%, 54.42%) for Gla-300 and 55.09% (53.34%, 56.84%) for IDeg-100; LS mean difference (non-inferiority): 3.16% (0.88%, 5.44%) (non-inferiority P = .0067). Non-inferiority was shown on glucose total coefficient of variation (main secondary endpoint): LS mean 39.91% (39.20%, 40.61%) and 41.22% (40.49%, 41.95%), respectively; LS mean difference (non-inferiority) -5.44% (-6.50%, -4.38%) (non-inferiority P < .0001). Superiority of Gla-300 over IDeg-100 was not shown on TIR. Occurrences of self-measured and CGM-derived hypoglycaemia were comparable between treatment groups. Safety profiles were consistent with known profiles, with no unexpected findings. Conclusions Using clinically relevant CGM metrics, InRange shows that Gla-300 is non-inferior to IDeg-100 in people with T1D, with comparable hypoglycaemia and safety profiles.
引用
收藏
页码:545 / 555
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A greater proportion of participants with type 2 diabetes achieve treatment targets with insulin degludec/liraglutide versus insulin glargine 100 units/mL at 26 weeks: DUAL VIII, a randomized trial designed to resemble clinical practice
    Sesti, Giorgio
    Bardtrum, Lars
    Dagdelen, Selcuk
    Halladin, Natalie
    Haluzik, Martin
    Orsy, Petra
    Rodriguez, Martin
    Aroda, Vanita R.
    DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2020, 22 (05): : 873 - 878
  • [42] Efficacy and safety of insulin glargine 300 U/mL vs insulin degludec in patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomized, open-label, cross-over study using continuous glucose monitoring profiles
    Kawaguchi, Yuji
    Sawa, Jun
    Sakuma, Noriko
    Kumeda, Yasuro
    JOURNAL OF DIABETES INVESTIGATION, 2019, 10 (02) : 343 - 351
  • [43] Insulin glargine 300 U/ml vs 100 U/ml: glucose profiles of morning vs evening injections in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus measured with continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)
    Bergenstal, R. M.
    Bailey, T. S.
    Rodbard, D.
    Ziemen, M.
    Guo, H.
    Muehlen-Bartmer, I.
    Ahmaan, A. J.
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2014, 57 : S388 - S389
  • [44] Differential glycaemic control with basal insulin glargine 300 U/mL versus degludec 100 U/mL according to kidney function in type 2 diabetes: A subanalysis from the BRIGHT trial
    Haluzik, Martin
    Cheng, Alice
    Mueller-Wieland, Dirk
    Westerbacka, Jukka
    Bosnyak, Zsolt
    Lauand, Felipe
    Melas-Melt, Lydie
    Karalliedde, Janaka
    Rosenstock, Julio
    Bolli, Geremia B.
    DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2020, 22 (08): : 1369 - 1377
  • [45] Comparison of the basal insulin analogues Gla-300 and IDeg 100 using continuous glucose monitoring in people with type 1 diabetes: the InRange randomised controlled trial
    Battelino, T.
    Danne, T.
    Edelman, S.
    Choudhary, P.
    Renard, E.
    Westerbacka, J.
    Mukherjee, B.
    Picard, P.
    Pilorget, V.
    Bergenstal, R.
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2022, 65 (SUPPL 1) : S130 - S130
  • [46] The Korean Titration: A Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Self-Titration Algorithms of Insulin Glargine 300 Units/ml in Patients with Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes
    Bae, Jae Hyun
    Ahn, Chang Ho
    Yang, Ye Seul
    Moon, Sun Joon
    Kwak, Soo Heon
    Jung, Hye Seung
    Park, Kyong Soo
    Cho, Young Min
    DIABETES, 2020, 69
  • [47] Continuous Glucose Monitoring During Basal-Bolus Therapy Using Insulin Glargine 300 U mL-1 and Glargine 100 U mL-1 in Japanese People with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: A Crossover Pilot Study
    Jinnouchi, Hideaki
    Koyama, Masayoshi
    Amano, Atsushi
    Takahashi, Yoshinori
    Yoshida, Akira
    Hieshima, Kunio
    Sugiyama, Seigo
    Kurinami, Noboru
    Jinnouchi, Tomio
    Becker, Reinhard
    DIABETES THERAPY, 2015, 6 (02) : 143 - 152
  • [48] Comparison of the efficacy and safety of once-daily insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) and long-acting second-generation basal insulin (insulin degludec and insulin glargine 300 units/mL) in insulin-naive Japanese adults with type 2 diabetes: a pilot, randomized, controlled study
    Shimoda, Seiya
    Sakamoto, Wakana
    Hokamura, Ayaka
    Matsuo, Yasuto
    Sekigami, Taiji
    Ichimori, Shinji
    Iwashita, Shinsuke
    Ishii, Norio
    Otsu, Kae
    Yoshimura, Ryohei
    Nishiyama, Toshihiko
    Sakaguchi, Masaji
    Nishida, Kcnro
    Araki, Eiichi
    ENDOCRINE JOURNAL, 2019, 66 (08) : 745 - 752
  • [49] The efficacy and safety of insulin glargine 100 U/mL + lixisenatide versus insulin degludec plus insulin aspart in Chinese people with type 2 diabetes suboptimally controlled with oral antidiabetic drugs: The Soli-D randomized controlled trial
    Mu, Yiming
    DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2024, 26 (11): : 5497 - 5499
  • [50] Efficacy and Safety of Self-Titration Algorithms of Insulin Glargine 300 units/mL in Individuals with Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (The Korean TITRATION Study): A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Bae, Jae Hyun
    Ahn, Chang Ho
    Yang, Ye Seul
    Moon, Sun Joon
    Kwak, Soo Heon
    Jung, Hye Seung
    Park, Kyong Soo
    Cho, Young Min
    DIABETES & METABOLISM JOURNAL, 2022, 46 (01) : 71 - +