Continuous glucose monitoring-based time-in-range using insulin glargine 300 units/ml versus insulin degludec 100 units/ml in type 1 diabetes: The head-to-head randomized controlled InRange trial

被引:20
|
作者
Battelino, Tadej [1 ]
Danne, Thomas [2 ]
Edelman, Steve, V [3 ]
Choudhary, Pratik [4 ]
Renard, Eric [5 ]
Westerbacka, Jukka [6 ]
Mukherjee, Bhaswati [6 ]
Pilorget, Valerie [6 ]
Coudert, Mathieu [6 ]
Bergenstal, Richard M. [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ljubljana, UMC Univ Childrens Hosp, Fac Med, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
[2] Childrens & Youth Hosp Auf Der Bult, Diabet Ctr Children & Adolescents, Hannover, Germany
[3] Univ Calif San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[4] Univ Leicester, Diabet Res Ctr, Leicester, Leics, England
[5] Univ Montpellier, Montpellier Univ Hosp, Dept Endocrinol Diabet & Nutr, Montpellier, France
[6] Sanofi, Paris, France
[7] HealthPartners Inst, Int Diabet Ctr, Minneapolis, MN USA
来源
DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM | 2023年 / 25卷 / 02期
关键词
basal insulin; continuous glucose monitoring; glycaemic control; insulin analogues; randomized trial; type; 1; diabetes; GLYCEMIC CONTROL; HYPOGLYCEMIA; VARIABILITY; PROFILES; PROVIDES; ADULTS; WORLD; U/ML;
D O I
10.1111/dom.14898
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aim To use continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)-based time-in-range (TIR) as a primary efficacy endpoint to compare the second-generation basal insulin (BI) analogues insulin glargine 300 U/ml (Gla-300) and insulin degludec 100 U/ml (IDeg-100) in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Materials and Methods InRange was a 12-week, multicentre, randomized, active-controlled, parallel-group, open-label study comparing glucose TIR and variability between Gla-300 and IDeg-100 using blinded 20-day CGM profiles. The inclusion criteria consisted of adults with T1D treated with multiple daily injections, using BI once daily and rapid-acting insulin analogues for at least 1 year, with an HbA1c of 7% or higher and of 10% or less at screening. Results Overall, 343 participants were randomized: 172 received Gla-300 and 171 IDeg-100. Non-inferiority (10% relative margin) of Gla-300 versus IDeg-100 was shown for the primary endpoint (percentage TIR >= 70 to <= 180 mg/dl): least squares (LS) mean (95% confidence interval) 52.74% (51.06%, 54.42%) for Gla-300 and 55.09% (53.34%, 56.84%) for IDeg-100; LS mean difference (non-inferiority): 3.16% (0.88%, 5.44%) (non-inferiority P = .0067). Non-inferiority was shown on glucose total coefficient of variation (main secondary endpoint): LS mean 39.91% (39.20%, 40.61%) and 41.22% (40.49%, 41.95%), respectively; LS mean difference (non-inferiority) -5.44% (-6.50%, -4.38%) (non-inferiority P < .0001). Superiority of Gla-300 over IDeg-100 was not shown on TIR. Occurrences of self-measured and CGM-derived hypoglycaemia were comparable between treatment groups. Safety profiles were consistent with known profiles, with no unexpected findings. Conclusions Using clinically relevant CGM metrics, InRange shows that Gla-300 is non-inferior to IDeg-100 in people with T1D, with comparable hypoglycaemia and safety profiles.
引用
收藏
页码:545 / 555
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Efficacy and safety of insulin glargine 300 U/mL vs insulin degludec in patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomized, open-label, cross-over study using continuous glucose monitoring profiles
    Kawaguchi, Yuji
    Sawa, Jun
    Sakuma, Noriko
    Kumeda, Yasuro
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DIABETES INVESTIGATION, 2019, 10 (02) : 343 - 351
  • [42] Insulin glargine 300 U/ml vs 100 U/ml: glucose profiles of morning vs evening injections in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus measured with continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)
    Bergenstal, R. M.
    Bailey, T. S.
    Rodbard, D.
    Ziemen, M.
    Guo, H.
    Muehlen-Bartmer, I.
    Ahmaan, A. J.
    [J]. DIABETOLOGIA, 2014, 57 : S388 - S389
  • [43] Differential glycaemic control with basal insulin glargine 300 U/mL versus degludec 100 U/mL according to kidney function in type 2 diabetes: A subanalysis from the BRIGHT trial
    Haluzik, Martin
    Cheng, Alice
    Mueller-Wieland, Dirk
    Westerbacka, Jukka
    Bosnyak, Zsolt
    Lauand, Felipe
    Melas-Melt, Lydie
    Karalliedde, Janaka
    Rosenstock, Julio
    Bolli, Geremia B.
    [J]. DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2020, 22 (08): : 1369 - 1377
  • [44] Comparison of the basal insulin analogues Gla-300 and IDeg 100 using continuous glucose monitoring in people with type 1 diabetes: the InRange randomised controlled trial
    Battelino, T.
    Danne, T.
    Edelman, S.
    Choudhary, P.
    Renard, E.
    Westerbacka, J.
    Mukherjee, B.
    Picard, P.
    Pilorget, V.
    Bergenstal, R.
    [J]. DIABETOLOGIA, 2022, 65 (SUPPL 1) : S130 - S130
  • [45] The Korean Titration: A Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Self-Titration Algorithms of Insulin Glargine 300 Units/ml in Patients with Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes
    Bae, Jae Hyun
    Ahn, Chang Ho
    Yang, Ye Seul
    Moon, Sun Joon
    Kwak, Soo Heon
    Jung, Hye Seung
    Park, Kyong Soo
    Cho, Young Min
    [J]. DIABETES, 2020, 69
  • [46] Continuous Glucose Monitoring During Basal-Bolus Therapy Using Insulin Glargine 300 U mL-1 and Glargine 100 U mL-1 in Japanese People with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: A Crossover Pilot Study
    Jinnouchi, Hideaki
    Koyama, Masayoshi
    Amano, Atsushi
    Takahashi, Yoshinori
    Yoshida, Akira
    Hieshima, Kunio
    Sugiyama, Seigo
    Kurinami, Noboru
    Jinnouchi, Tomio
    Becker, Reinhard
    [J]. DIABETES THERAPY, 2015, 6 (02) : 143 - 152
  • [47] Comparison of the efficacy and safety of once-daily insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) and long-acting second-generation basal insulin (insulin degludec and insulin glargine 300 units/mL) in insulin-naive Japanese adults with type 2 diabetes: a pilot, randomized, controlled study
    Shimoda, Seiya
    Sakamoto, Wakana
    Hokamura, Ayaka
    Matsuo, Yasuto
    Sekigami, Taiji
    Ichimori, Shinji
    Iwashita, Shinsuke
    Ishii, Norio
    Otsu, Kae
    Yoshimura, Ryohei
    Nishiyama, Toshihiko
    Sakaguchi, Masaji
    Nishida, Kcnro
    Araki, Eiichi
    [J]. ENDOCRINE JOURNAL, 2019, 66 (08) : 745 - 752
  • [48] The efficacy and safety of insulin glargine 100 U/mL + lixisenatide versus insulin degludec plus insulin aspart in Chinese people with type 2 diabetes suboptimally controlled with oral antidiabetic drugs: The Soli-D randomized controlled trial
    Mu, Yiming
    [J]. DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2024,
  • [49] Efficacy and Safety of Self-Titration Algorithms of Insulin Glargine 300 units/mL in Individuals with Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (The Korean TITRATION Study): A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Bae, Jae Hyun
    Ahn, Chang Ho
    Yang, Ye Seul
    Moon, Sun Joon
    Kwak, Soo Heon
    Jung, Hye Seung
    Park, Kyong Soo
    Cho, Young Min
    [J]. DIABETES & METABOLISM JOURNAL, 2022, 46 (01) : 71 - +
  • [50] Insulin glargine 300 U/ml versus insulin degludec 100 U/ml improves nocturnal glycaemic control and variability in type 1 diabetes under routine clinical practice: A glucodensities-based post hoc analysis of the OneCare study
    Gomez-Peralta, Fernando
    Ballesteros, Ana Chico
    Martinez, Amparo Marco
    Corral, Begona Perez
    Donlo, Ignacio Conget
    Melo, Paulina Fuentealba
    Arnaez, Fernando Zaragoza
    Rodriguez, Marcos Matabuena
    [J]. DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2024, 26 (05): : 1993 - 1997