Comparing eDQE and eNEQ metrics - is there an alternative approach to assessing image quality in digital mammography?

被引:0
|
作者
Wysocka-Rabin, Anna [1 ]
Dobrzynska, Magdalena [1 ]
Pasicz, Katarzyna [2 ]
Skrzynski, Witold [2 ]
Fabiszewska, Ewa [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Ctr Nucl Res NCNR, Particle Accelerat Phys & Technol Div, Otwock, Poland
[2] Mar Sklodowska Curie Natl Res Inst Oncol MSCNRIO, Med Phys Dept, Warsaw, Poland
来源
关键词
image quality; digital mammography; effective detective quantum efficiency; effective noise equivalent quanta; DQE; SYSTEMS; SCATTER; MTF;
D O I
10.2478/pjmpe-2023-0018
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Introduction: Early detection of breast cancer requires high-quality mammographic images that have been made possible by the introduction of new technologies, such as full-field digital mammography (FFDM). In this new study, we perform extended measurements to calculate effective detective quantum efficiency (eDQE) and introduce effective noise equivalent quanta (eNEQ). Our aim was to show how these two metrics relate to the image quality of two digital mammography systems.Material and methods: Measurements were performed for a Siemens Mammomat Inspiration and a GE Senographe Pristina system. Each was equipped with an automatic exposure control (AEC) for use in a clinical setting. We used a polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) phantom at thicknesses of 20, 30, 40 and 70 mm to cover the range of scatter conditions expected in mammography, with and without an anti-scatter grid. The Siemens system had an a-Se detector, and the GE system had an indirect-conversion detector. Measurements of Kerma were performed with Piranha Black 657 meter (RTI Electronics AB). The majority of our calculations were automated, using a modified version of our software.Results: For the two mammographic systems evaluated, we characterized physical quality parameters, such as effective modulation transfer function (eMTF), effective normalized noise power spectrum (eNNPS), eDQE and eNEQ for a wide range of exposures, phantom thicknesses, with and without an anti-scatter grid. Results are presented as a function of spatial frequency. A contrast-detail analysis was performed with a CDMAM 3.4 phantom with dedicated software (CDMAM analysis 1.5.5, NCCPM) and a set of different PMMA phantoms.Conclusions: We successfully demonstrated that the eNEQ metric can be used as a new option to evaluate image quality for images taken with and without a grid and with phantoms of different thicknesses for the Siemens and GE systems. These results were consistent with the results obtained from CDMAM.
引用
收藏
页码:165 / 177
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comprehensive assessment of image quality in synthetic and digital mammography: a quantitative comparison
    Patrizio Barca
    Rocco Lamastra
    Giacomo Aringhieri
    Raffaele Maria Tucciariello
    Antonio Traino
    Maria Evelina Fantacci
    Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine, 2019, 42 : 1141 - 1152
  • [42] A comparative study of physical image quality in digital and synthetic mammography from commercially available mammography systems
    Baldelli, Paola
    Bertolini, Marco
    Contillo, Adriano
    Della Gala, Giuseppe
    Golinelli, Paola
    Pagan, Laura
    Rivetti, Stefano
    Taibi, Angelo
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2018, 63 (16):
  • [43] ASSESSING IMAGE QUALITY AND ESTIMATING THE GLANDULAR AVERAGE DOSE IN SOME MAMMOGRAPHY LABS
    Mossang, D.
    Dadulescu, E.
    ROMANIAN REPORTS IN PHYSICS, 2011, 63 (01) : 95 - 106
  • [44] An Efficient Approach of Assessing Quality of Blurred Image
    Baig, Md Amir
    Moinuddin, Athar A.
    Khan, Ekram
    Ghanbari, Mohammed
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PATTERN RECOGNITION AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2023, 37 (13)
  • [45] Assessing the quality of sustainability reporting: an alternative methodological approach
    Daub, Claus-Heinrich
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2007, 15 (01) : 75 - 85
  • [46] ACR–AAPM–SIIM Practice Guideline for Determinants of Image Quality in Digital Mammography
    Kalpana M. Kanal
    Elizabeth Krupinski
    Eric A. Berns
    William R. Geiser
    Andrew Karellas
    Martha B. Mainiero
    Melissa C. Martin
    Samir B. Patel
    Daniel L. Rubin
    Jon D. Shepard
    Eliot L. Siegel
    Judith A. Wolfman
    Tariq A. Mian
    Mary C. Mahoney
    Margaret Wyatt
    Journal of Digital Imaging, 2013, 26 : 10 - 25
  • [47] Analysis of feature relevance using an image quality index applied to digital mammography
    Costa, Arthur C.
    Barufaldi, Bruno
    Borges, Lucas R.
    Biehl, Michael
    Maidment, Andrew D. A.
    Vieira, Marcelo A. C.
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2019: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2019, 10948
  • [48] Experimental investigation of the dose and image quality characteristics of a digital mammography imaging system
    Huda, W
    Sajewicz, AM
    Ogden, KM
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 30 (03) : 442 - 448
  • [49] Needle breast biopsy specimen radiography on digital mammography: Optimization of image quality
    Langenberger, H
    Kaindl, E
    Semturs, F
    Nowotny, R
    Helbich, TH
    RADIOLOGY, 2002, 225 : 118 - 118
  • [50] Evaluation of the quality of image for various breast composition and exposure conditions in digital mammography
    Yamada, Maki
    Kato, Yuri
    Fujita, Naotoshi
    Kodera, Yoshie
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2011: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2011, 7961