Comparing eDQE and eNEQ metrics - is there an alternative approach to assessing image quality in digital mammography?

被引:0
|
作者
Wysocka-Rabin, Anna [1 ]
Dobrzynska, Magdalena [1 ]
Pasicz, Katarzyna [2 ]
Skrzynski, Witold [2 ]
Fabiszewska, Ewa [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Ctr Nucl Res NCNR, Particle Accelerat Phys & Technol Div, Otwock, Poland
[2] Mar Sklodowska Curie Natl Res Inst Oncol MSCNRIO, Med Phys Dept, Warsaw, Poland
来源
关键词
image quality; digital mammography; effective detective quantum efficiency; effective noise equivalent quanta; DQE; SYSTEMS; SCATTER; MTF;
D O I
10.2478/pjmpe-2023-0018
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Introduction: Early detection of breast cancer requires high-quality mammographic images that have been made possible by the introduction of new technologies, such as full-field digital mammography (FFDM). In this new study, we perform extended measurements to calculate effective detective quantum efficiency (eDQE) and introduce effective noise equivalent quanta (eNEQ). Our aim was to show how these two metrics relate to the image quality of two digital mammography systems.Material and methods: Measurements were performed for a Siemens Mammomat Inspiration and a GE Senographe Pristina system. Each was equipped with an automatic exposure control (AEC) for use in a clinical setting. We used a polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) phantom at thicknesses of 20, 30, 40 and 70 mm to cover the range of scatter conditions expected in mammography, with and without an anti-scatter grid. The Siemens system had an a-Se detector, and the GE system had an indirect-conversion detector. Measurements of Kerma were performed with Piranha Black 657 meter (RTI Electronics AB). The majority of our calculations were automated, using a modified version of our software.Results: For the two mammographic systems evaluated, we characterized physical quality parameters, such as effective modulation transfer function (eMTF), effective normalized noise power spectrum (eNNPS), eDQE and eNEQ for a wide range of exposures, phantom thicknesses, with and without an anti-scatter grid. Results are presented as a function of spatial frequency. A contrast-detail analysis was performed with a CDMAM 3.4 phantom with dedicated software (CDMAM analysis 1.5.5, NCCPM) and a set of different PMMA phantoms.Conclusions: We successfully demonstrated that the eNEQ metric can be used as a new option to evaluate image quality for images taken with and without a grid and with phantoms of different thicknesses for the Siemens and GE systems. These results were consistent with the results obtained from CDMAM.
引用
收藏
页码:165 / 177
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Image quality assessment in digital mammography: part II. NPWE as a validated alternative for contrast detail analysis
    Monnin, P.
    Marshall, N. W.
    Bosmans, H.
    Bochud, F. O.
    Verdun, F. R.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2011, 56 (14): : 4221 - 4238
  • [22] LATIN AMERICAN IMAGE QUALITY SURVEY IN DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY STUDIES
    Mora, Patricia
    Khoury, Helen
    Bitelli, Regina
    Rosa Quintero, Ana
    Garay, Fernando
    Garcia Aguilar, Juan
    Gamarra, Mirtha
    Ubeda, Carlos
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2017, 174 (01) : 94 - 101
  • [23] Image quality of a prototype direct conversion detector for digital mammography
    Mainprize, JG
    Ford, NL
    Yin, S
    Tümer, T
    Yaffe, MJ
    MEDICAL IMAGING 1999: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, PTS 1 AND 2, 1999, 3659 : 398 - 406
  • [24] Image Quality and Radiation Dose Assessment of a Digital Mammography System
    Isa, N. M.
    Hassan, W. M. S. W.
    Abdullah, W. A. K. W.
    Othman, F.
    Ramli, A. A. M.
    PROGRESS OF PHYSICS RESEARCH IN MALAYSIA, PERFIK2009, 2010, 1250 : 397 - +
  • [25] Comparison of image quality in contact and magnification modes in digital mammography
    Liu, B.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 33 (06) : 2014 - 2014
  • [26] Which Phantom Is Better for Assessing the Image Quality in Full-Field Digital Mammography?: American College of Radiology Accreditation Phantom versus Digital Mammography Accreditation Phantom
    Song, Sung Eun
    Seo, Bo Kyoung
    Yie, An
    Ku, Bon Kyung
    Kim, Hee-Young
    Cho, Kyu Ran
    Chung, Hwan Hoon
    Lee, Seung Hwa
    Hwang, Kyu-Won
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2012, 13 (06) : 776 - 783
  • [27] Assessing Quality Metrics in Ophthalmic Surgery: A Standardized Approach
    Ali, Muhammad
    Lorch, Alice C.
    Woreta, Fasika
    OPHTHALMOLOGY SCIENCE, 2023, 3 (04):
  • [28] Comparing the Performance of Image Enhancement Methods to Detect Microcalcification Clusters in Digital Mammography
    Moradmand, Hajar
    Setayeshi, Saeed
    Karimian, Ali Reza
    Sirous, Mehri
    Akbari, Mohammad Esmaeil
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2012, 5 (02) : 61 - 68
  • [29] Assessing Objective Image Quality Metrics for Bidirectional Texture Functions
    Azari, Banafsheh
    Bertel, Sven
    Wuethrich, Charles A.
    26. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE IN CENTRAL EUROPE ON COMPUTER GRAPHICS, VISUALIZATION AND COMPUTER VISION (WSCG 2018), 2018, 2801 : 39 - 48
  • [30] Assessing and Comparing Anesthesiologists' Performance on Mandated Metrics Using a Bayesian Approach
    Bayman, Emine Ozgur
    Dexter, Franklin
    Todd, Michael M.
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2015, 123 (01) : 101 - 115