Analysis of interreader agreement in structured reports of pelvic multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging using the METastasis Reporting and Data System for Prostate Cancer guidelines

被引:1
|
作者
Liu, Xiang [1 ]
Xie, Tingting [2 ]
Sun, Zhaonan [1 ]
Guo, Ying [1 ]
Zhang, Xiaodong [1 ]
Wang, Xiaoying [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ First Hosp, Dept Radiol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Univ Shenzhen Hosp, Dept Radiol, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
来源
关键词
Advanced prostate cancer; interreader agreement; METastasis Reporting and Data System for Prostate Cancer; mpMRI; response assessment category; BONE METASTASES; MRI;
D O I
10.5152/dir.2022.211232
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE To evaluate interreader agreement on pelvic multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) interpretation among radiologists using a structured reporting tool based on the METastasis Reporting and Data System for Prostate Cancer (MET-RADS-P) guidelines. METHODS A structured report for follow-up pelvic mpMRI for advanced prostate cancer (APC) patients was formulated based on MET-RADS-P guidelines. In total, 163 paired pelvic mpMRI examinations were performed from December 2017 to February 2021 on 105 patients with APC. These were retrospectively reviewed by two senior and two junior radiologists for metastatic lesion detection and were categorized by these readers using primary/secondary response assessment categories (RACs), with and without the structured report. Interreader agreement regarding metastasis detection and RAC scores was evaluated with Cohen's kappa and weighted Cohen's kappa statistics (K), respectively. RESULTS The two senior radiologists showed higher agreement with the reference standard for metastasis detection using the structured report (S1: K = 0.83; S2: K = 0.73) compared with the conventional report (S1: K = 0.72; S2: K = 0.61). Junior radiologists showed similar results (J1: 0.66 vs. 0.59; J2: 0.65 vs. 0.57). The overall agreement between the two senior radiologists was excellent for the primary RAC pattern using the structured reports (K = 0.81) and was substantial for secondary RAC categorization (K = 0.75). The interreader agreement of the two junior radiologists was substantial for both primary and secondary RAC values (K = 0.76, 0.68). CONCLUSION Good interreader agreement was found for the follow-up assessment of APC patients between radiologists, where the pelvic mpMRI was reported using MET-RADS-P guidelines. This improvement applied to both metastatic lesion detection and qualitative RAC assessment.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 39
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Accuracy and Interobserver Agreement for Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System, Version 2, for the Characterization of Lesions Identified on Multiparametric MRI of the Prostate
    Purysko, Andrei S.
    Bittencourt, Leonardo K.
    Bullen, Jennifer A.
    Mostardeiro, Thomaz R.
    Herts, Brian R.
    Klein, Eric A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2017, 209 (02) : 339 - 345
  • [32] A Prospective Accuracy Study of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer With Whole-mount Pathology
    Giannarini, Gianluca
    Girometti, Rossano
    Crestani, Alessandro
    Rossanese, Marta
    Calandriello, Mettle
    Cereser, Lorenzo
    Bednarova, Sandra
    Battistella, Claudio
    Sioletic, Stefano
    Zuiani, Chiara
    Valotto, Claudio
    Ficarra, Vincenzo
    UROLOGY, 2019, 123 : 191 - 196
  • [33] Prostate biopsy strategy integrating prostate health index and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging optimizes the predictive value of clinically significant prostate cancer in prostate imaging reporting and data system gray-zone imaging
    Chiu, Shih-Ting
    Chen, Yu-Ching
    Huang, Chao-Yuan
    Cheng, Yung-Ting
    Pu, Yeong-Shiau
    Lu, Yu-Chuan
    Chiang, Chih-Hung
    Chen, Pei-Ling
    Chueh, Jeff S.
    Hong, Jian-Hua
    UROLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 34 (02) : 86 - 92
  • [34] Interreader agreement with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Version 2.1 to improve the detection rate of prostate cancer in MRI/TRUS software fusion prostate biopsy
    Kim, J.
    Song, W. H.
    Lee, D. D.
    Lee, S. S.
    Nam, J. K.
    Ryu, H. S.
    Kim, T. U.
    Park, S. W.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2022, 81 : S722 - S723
  • [35] Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Local Recurrence Reporting (PI-RR): International Consensus -based Guidelines on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer Recurrence after Radiation Therapy and Radical Prostatectomy
    Panebianco, Valeria
    Villeirs, Geert
    Weinreb, Jeffrey C.
    Turkbey, Baris, I
    Margolis, Daniel J.
    Richenberg, Jonathan
    Schoots, Ivo G.
    Moore, Caroline M.
    Futterer, Jurgen
    Macura, Katarzyna J.
    Oto, Aytekin
    Bittencourt, Leonardo K.
    Haider, Masoom A.
    Salomon, Georg
    Tempany, Clare M.
    Padhani, Anwar R.
    Barentsz, Jelle O.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2021, 4 (06): : 868 - 876
  • [36] Decision support system for localizing prostate cancer based on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging
    Shah, Vijay
    Turkbey, Baris
    Mani, Haresh
    Pang, Yuxi
    Pohida, Thomas
    Merino, Maria J.
    Pinto, Peter A.
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Bernardo, Marcelino
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (07) : 4093 - 4103
  • [37] Prostate Cancer Localization Using Multiparametric MR Imaging: Comparison of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) and Likert Scales
    Rosenkrantz, Andrew B.
    Kim, Sooah
    Lim, Ruth P.
    Hindman, Nicole
    Deng, Fang-Ming
    Babb, James S.
    Taneja, Samir S.
    RADIOLOGY, 2013, 269 (02) : 481 - 491
  • [38] Prostate cancer detection rates of magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy related to Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System score
    Daniël F. Osses
    Joost J. van Asten
    Gerard J. Kieft
    Jasper D. Tijsterman
    World Journal of Urology, 2017, 35 : 207 - 212
  • [39] Prostate cancer detection rates of magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy related to Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System score
    Osses, Daniel F.
    van Asten, Joost J.
    Kieft, Gerard J.
    Tijsterman, Jasper D.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 35 (02) : 207 - 212
  • [40] Reply to "Prostate Cancer and Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Category 3 Lesions Identified at Multiparametric Prostate MRI"
    Sheridan, Alison D.
    Weinreb, Jeffrey C.
    Spektor, Michael
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2018, 210 (06) : W269 - W269