Analysis of interreader agreement in structured reports of pelvic multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging using the METastasis Reporting and Data System for Prostate Cancer guidelines

被引:1
|
作者
Liu, Xiang [1 ]
Xie, Tingting [2 ]
Sun, Zhaonan [1 ]
Guo, Ying [1 ]
Zhang, Xiaodong [1 ]
Wang, Xiaoying [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ First Hosp, Dept Radiol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Univ Shenzhen Hosp, Dept Radiol, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
来源
关键词
Advanced prostate cancer; interreader agreement; METastasis Reporting and Data System for Prostate Cancer; mpMRI; response assessment category; BONE METASTASES; MRI;
D O I
10.5152/dir.2022.211232
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE To evaluate interreader agreement on pelvic multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) interpretation among radiologists using a structured reporting tool based on the METastasis Reporting and Data System for Prostate Cancer (MET-RADS-P) guidelines. METHODS A structured report for follow-up pelvic mpMRI for advanced prostate cancer (APC) patients was formulated based on MET-RADS-P guidelines. In total, 163 paired pelvic mpMRI examinations were performed from December 2017 to February 2021 on 105 patients with APC. These were retrospectively reviewed by two senior and two junior radiologists for metastatic lesion detection and were categorized by these readers using primary/secondary response assessment categories (RACs), with and without the structured report. Interreader agreement regarding metastasis detection and RAC scores was evaluated with Cohen's kappa and weighted Cohen's kappa statistics (K), respectively. RESULTS The two senior radiologists showed higher agreement with the reference standard for metastasis detection using the structured report (S1: K = 0.83; S2: K = 0.73) compared with the conventional report (S1: K = 0.72; S2: K = 0.61). Junior radiologists showed similar results (J1: 0.66 vs. 0.59; J2: 0.65 vs. 0.57). The overall agreement between the two senior radiologists was excellent for the primary RAC pattern using the structured reports (K = 0.81) and was substantial for secondary RAC categorization (K = 0.75). The interreader agreement of the two junior radiologists was substantial for both primary and secondary RAC values (K = 0.76, 0.68). CONCLUSION Good interreader agreement was found for the follow-up assessment of APC patients between radiologists, where the pelvic mpMRI was reported using MET-RADS-P guidelines. This improvement applied to both metastatic lesion detection and qualitative RAC assessment.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 39
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A Prospective Accuracy Study of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer With Whole-mount Pathology REPLY
    Giannarini, Gianluca
    Girometti, Rossano
    Crestani, Alessandro
    Ficarra, Vincenzo
    UROLOGY, 2019, 123 : 197 - 197
  • [42] A Prospective Accuracy Study of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer With Whole-mount Pathology COMMENT
    Purysko, Andrei S.
    UROLOGY, 2019, 123 : 196 - 197
  • [43] Comparison between biparametric and multiparametric MR imaging of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.1 in detection of prostate cancer
    EL-Adalany, Mohamed Ali
    Abd EL-Razek, Ahmed Abd E. L-khalek
    EL-Diasty, Tarek
    EL-Hendy, Ahmed
    EL-Metwally, Dina
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2021, 52 (01):
  • [44] Comparison between biparametric and multiparametric MR imaging of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.1 in detection of prostate cancer
    Mohamed Ali EL-Adalany
    Ahmed Abd E L-khalek Abd EL-Razek
    Tarek EL-Diasty
    Ahmed EL-Hendy
    Dina EL-Metwally
    Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, 52
  • [45] METastasis Reporting and Data System for Prostate Cancer as a Prognostic Imaging Marker in Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer
    Yoshida, Soichiro
    Takahara, Taro
    Ishii, Chikako
    Arita, Yuki
    Waseda, Yuma
    Kijima, Toshiki
    Yokoyama, Minato
    Ishioka, Junichiro
    Matsuoka, Yoh
    Saito, Kazutaka
    Fujii, Yasuhisa
    CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER, 2020, 18 (04) : E391 - E396
  • [46] Comparison of prostate imaging reporting and data system v2.1 and 2 in transition and peripheral zones: evaluation of interreader agreement and diagnostic performance in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer
    Urase, Yasuyo
    Ueno, Yoshiko
    Tamada, Tsutomu
    Sofue, Keitaro
    Takahashi, Satoru
    Hinata, Nobuyuki
    Harada, Kenichi
    Fujisawa, Masato
    Murakami, Takamichi
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 95 (1131):
  • [47] The Value of Prostate-specific Antigen Density for Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System 3 Lesions on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Strategy to Avoid Unnecessary Prostate Biopsies
    Goertz, Magdalena
    Radtke, Jan Philipp
    Hatiboglu, Gencay
    Schuetz, Viktoria
    Tosev, Georgi
    Guettlein, Maximilian
    Leichsenring, Jonas
    Stenzinger, Albrecht
    Bonekamp, David
    Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter
    Hohenfellner, Markus
    Nyarangi-Dix, Joanne Nyaboe
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2021, 7 (02): : 325 - 331
  • [48] Does the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2 improve accuracy in reporting anterior lesions on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)?
    Richard Hoffmann
    Callum Logan
    Michael O’Callaghan
    Kirsten Gormly
    Ken Chan
    Darren Foreman
    International Urology and Nephrology, 2018, 50 : 13 - 19
  • [49] A NEW SCORING SYSTEM USING PROSTATE IMAGING REPORTING AND DATA SYSTEM (PI-RADS) TO DETECT SIGNIFICANT CANCER FOR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING-TARGETED PROSTATE BIOPSY
    Kataoka, Madoka
    Ito, Masaya
    Nakanishi, Yasukazu
    Takemura, Kosuke
    Suzuki, Hiroaki
    Fuse, Honoka
    Iida, Noriyuki
    Tobisu, Kenichi
    Koga, Fumitaka
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 : E854 - E854
  • [50] Does the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2 improve accuracy in reporting anterior lesions on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)?
    Hoffmann, Richard
    Logan, Callum
    O'Callaghan, Michael
    Gormly, Kirsten
    Chan, Ken
    Foreman, Darren
    INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2018, 50 (01) : 13 - 19