Analysis of interreader agreement in structured reports of pelvic multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging using the METastasis Reporting and Data System for Prostate Cancer guidelines

被引:1
|
作者
Liu, Xiang [1 ]
Xie, Tingting [2 ]
Sun, Zhaonan [1 ]
Guo, Ying [1 ]
Zhang, Xiaodong [1 ]
Wang, Xiaoying [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ First Hosp, Dept Radiol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Univ Shenzhen Hosp, Dept Radiol, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
来源
关键词
Advanced prostate cancer; interreader agreement; METastasis Reporting and Data System for Prostate Cancer; mpMRI; response assessment category; BONE METASTASES; MRI;
D O I
10.5152/dir.2022.211232
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE To evaluate interreader agreement on pelvic multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) interpretation among radiologists using a structured reporting tool based on the METastasis Reporting and Data System for Prostate Cancer (MET-RADS-P) guidelines. METHODS A structured report for follow-up pelvic mpMRI for advanced prostate cancer (APC) patients was formulated based on MET-RADS-P guidelines. In total, 163 paired pelvic mpMRI examinations were performed from December 2017 to February 2021 on 105 patients with APC. These were retrospectively reviewed by two senior and two junior radiologists for metastatic lesion detection and were categorized by these readers using primary/secondary response assessment categories (RACs), with and without the structured report. Interreader agreement regarding metastasis detection and RAC scores was evaluated with Cohen's kappa and weighted Cohen's kappa statistics (K), respectively. RESULTS The two senior radiologists showed higher agreement with the reference standard for metastasis detection using the structured report (S1: K = 0.83; S2: K = 0.73) compared with the conventional report (S1: K = 0.72; S2: K = 0.61). Junior radiologists showed similar results (J1: 0.66 vs. 0.59; J2: 0.65 vs. 0.57). The overall agreement between the two senior radiologists was excellent for the primary RAC pattern using the structured reports (K = 0.81) and was substantial for secondary RAC categorization (K = 0.75). The interreader agreement of the two junior radiologists was substantial for both primary and secondary RAC values (K = 0.76, 0.68). CONCLUSION Good interreader agreement was found for the follow-up assessment of APC patients between radiologists, where the pelvic mpMRI was reported using MET-RADS-P guidelines. This improvement applied to both metastatic lesion detection and qualitative RAC assessment.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 39
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Impact of Multiparametric Pelvic Magnetic Resonance Imaging on Risk Stratification in Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer
    Marcus, David M.
    Rossi, Peter J.
    Nour, Sherif G.
    Jani, Ashesh B.
    UROLOGY, 2014, 84 (01) : 132 - 137
  • [22] Evaluation of an Automated Analysis Tool for Prostate Cancer Prediction Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Roethke, Matthias C.
    Kuru, Timur H.
    Mueller-Wolf, Maya B.
    Agterhuis, Erik
    Edler, Christopher
    Hohenfellner, Markus
    Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter
    Hadaschik, Boris A.
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (07):
  • [23] A PROSPECTIVE DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY STUDY OF PROSTATE IMAGING REPORTING AND DATA SYSTEM VERSION 2 ON 3 TESLA MULTIPARAMETRIC MULTIPARAMETRIC MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING IN DETECTING PROSTATE CANCER WITH WHOLE-MOUNT PATHOLOGY
    Giannarini, Gianluca
    Girometti, Rossano
    Sioletic, Stefano
    Rossanese, Marta
    Palumbo, Vito
    Calandriello, Mattia
    Crestani, Alessandro
    Zuiani, Chiara
    Ficarra, Vincenzo
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 199 (04): : E261 - E261
  • [24] Imaging Prostate Cancer Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Past, Present, and Future
    Kasson, Matthew
    Ortman, Michael
    Gaitonde, Krishnanath
    Verma, Sadhna
    Sidana, Abhinav
    SEMINARS IN ROENTGENOLOGY, 2018, 53 (03) : 200 - 205
  • [25] Prostate Imaging for Local Recurrence Reporting and Data System using Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Proposal
    Scialpi, Michele
    Martorana, Eugenio
    Trippa, Fabio
    Di Marzo, Alessandro
    Scalera, Giovanni Battista
    Aisa, Maria Cristina
    D'Andrea, Alfredo
    Mancioli, Francesco Maria
    Nicola, Refky
    Scialpi, Pietro
    Di Blasi, Aldo
    UROLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2023, 49 (04) : 233 - 240
  • [26] Interreader Variability of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 in Detecting and Assessing Prostate Cancer Lesions at Prostate MRI
    Budovec, Joseph J.
    Mulligan, Margaret
    Mautz, Alan
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2019, 212 (06) : 1205 - 1205
  • [27] IMPROVED NONINVASIVE PROSTATE CANCER ASSESSMENT USING MULTIPARAMETRIC MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
    Li, Xia
    Singanamalli, Asha
    Shanbhag, Dattesh
    Hotker, Andreas M.
    Aras, Omer
    Akin, Oguz
    Bhagalia, Roshni
    2016 IEEE 13TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON BIOMEDICAL IMAGING (ISBI), 2016, : 1199 - 1203
  • [28] Interobserver Agreement of Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2018
    Abdel Razek, Ahmed Abdel Khalek
    El-Serougy, Lamiaa Galal
    Saleh, Gehad Ahmad
    Abd el-wahab, Rihame
    Shabana, Walaa
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2020, 44 (01) : 118 - 123
  • [29] Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Bladder Cancer: Development of VI-RADS (Vesical Imaging-Reporting And Data System)
    Panebianco, Valeria
    Narumi, Yoshifumi
    Altun, Ersan
    Bochner, Bernard H.
    Efstathiou, Jason A.
    Hafeez, Shaista
    Huddart, Robert
    Kennish, Steve
    Lerner, Seth
    Montironi, Rodolfo
    Muglia, Valdair F.
    Salomon, Georg
    Thomas, Stephen
    Vargas, Hebert Alberto
    Witjes, J. Alfred
    Takeuchi, Mitsuru
    Barentsz, Jelle
    Catto, James W. F.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2018, 74 (03) : 294 - 306
  • [30] Prostate Cancer and Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Category 3 Lesions Identified at Multiparametric Prostate MRI
    Ortman, Michael
    Kasson, Matthew
    Sidana, Abhinav
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2018, 210 (06) : W268 - W268