Prostate Imaging for Local Recurrence Reporting and Data System using Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Proposal

被引:0
|
作者
Scialpi, Michele [1 ]
Martorana, Eugenio [2 ]
Trippa, Fabio [3 ]
Di Marzo, Alessandro [3 ]
Scalera, Giovanni Battista [4 ]
Aisa, Maria Cristina [5 ]
D'Andrea, Alfredo [6 ]
Mancioli, Francesco Maria [7 ]
Nicola, Refky [8 ]
Scialpi, Pietro [9 ]
Di Blasi, Aldo [10 ]
机构
[1] Univ Perugia, Santa Maria Misericordia Hosp, Div Diagnost Imaging, Dept Med & Surg, Perugia, Italy
[2] Nuovo Osped Civile Sassuolo, Div Urol, Modena, Italy
[3] Osped Santa Maria, Radiat Oncol Ctr, Terni, Italy
[4] Perugia Hosp Author, Div Radiol, Perugia, Italy
[5] Univ Perugia, Santa Maria Misericordia Hosp, Div Obstetr & Gynaecol, Dept Med & Surg, Perugia, Italy
[6] Osped Caserta, Div Radiol, Caserta, Italy
[7] Osped Santa Maria, Div Radiol, Terni, Italy
[8] SUNY Upstate Med Univ, SUNY Upstate Med, Dept Radiol, Syracuse, NY USA
[9] Portogruaro Hosp, Div Urol, Venice, Italy
[10] Tivoli Hosp, Div Radiol, Tivoli, Italy
关键词
Prostate cancer (PCa); prostate cancer local recurrence (PCLR); radiation therapy (RT); radical prostatectomy (RP); magnetic resonance imaging; Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Local Recurrence Reporting (PI-RRADS); EXTERNAL-BEAM RADIOTHERAPY; INCREMENTAL VALUE; CANCER; MRI; THERAPY; 3T; LOCALIZATION; MANAGEMENT; BIOPSY; COIL;
D O I
10.5152/tud.2023.22228
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
We investigated a novel dedicated Prostate Imaging for Local Recurrence Reporting and Data System (PI-RRADS) in biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radiotherapy (RT) and radical prostatectomy (RP) evaluating biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI) exams, at 3T MRI of 55 patients. Associating bpMRI and BCR data, we calculated bpMRI diagnostic accuracy. Four probability categories, from 1 (very low) to 4 (very high), were distinguished. In 20 patients with radiotherapy, 25% and 75% of lesions were reported as PI-RRADS 3, and 4, respectively. In 35 patients with radical prostatectomy, 7.7% of lesions were included in PI-RRADS 1-2, whereas 40.4% and 51.9% in PI-RRADS 3 and 4 categories, respectively. Excellent agreement and significant correlation between bpMRI and BCR were found. BpMRI showed sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, false-positive value, false-negative value, and total diagnostic accuracy of 96.15%, 86.7%, 97.4 %, 81.25%, 13.3%, 3.8% and 94.6%, respectively. PI-RRADS based on bpMRI allows the detection and localization of local recurrence in BCR after RT and RP contributing in clinical management and treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:233 / 240
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Simplified Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System for Biparametric Prostate MRI: A Proposal
    Scialpi, Michele
    Aisa, Maria Cristina
    D'Andrea, Alfredo
    Martorana, Eugenio
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2018, 211 (02) : 379 - 382
  • [2] Risk stratification system for biparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging
    Martorana, Eugenio
    Scialpi, Pietro
    Grisanti, Riccardo
    Scialpi, Michele
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2019, 8 : S482 - S483
  • [3] Interpretation of Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using Prostate Imaging and Data Reporting System Version 2.1: A Primer
    Spilseth, Benjamin
    Margolis, Daniel J. A.
    Gupta, Rajan T.
    Chang, Silvia D.
    RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2024, 62 (01) : 17 - 36
  • [4] The Utility of Combined Target and Systematic Prostate Biopsies in the Diagnosis of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Using Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 Based on Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Kato, Daiki
    Ozawa, Kaori
    Takeuchi, Shinichi
    Kawase, Makoto
    Kawase, Kota
    Nakai, Chie
    Takai, Manabu
    Iinuma, Koji
    Nakane, Keita
    Kato, Hiroki
    Matsuo, Masayuki
    Suzui, Natsuko
    Miyazaki, Tatsuhiko
    Koie, Takuya
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2021, 28 (02) : 1294 - 1301
  • [5] Prevalence of clinically significant prostate carcinoma in Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PIRADS) 3 lesions detected in the peripheral zone on biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)da local experience
    Khalid, M. J.
    Parker, P.
    Smith, S.
    Byass, O. R.
    Cast, J. E. I.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2024, 79 (10) : 773 - 780
  • [6] Interpreting Prostate Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Urologists' Guide Including Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System
    Christidis, Daniel
    McGrath, Shannon
    Leaney, Barry
    O'Sullivan, Richard
    Lawrentschuk, Nathan
    UROLOGY, 2018, 111 : 136 - 138
  • [7] Accuracy and Variability of Prostate Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Interpretation Using the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System: A Blinded Comparison of Radiologists
    Pickersgill, Nicholas A.
    Vetter, Joel M.
    Andriole, Gerald L.
    Shetty, Anup S.
    Fowler, Kathryn J.
    Mintz, Aaron J.
    Siegel, Cary L.
    Kim, Eric H.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2020, 6 (02): : 267 - 272
  • [8] Prostagram magnetic resonance imaging in a screening population: Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System or Likert?
    Mayor, Nikhil
    Eldred-Evans, David
    Tam, Henry
    Sokhi, Heminder
    Padhani, Anwar R.
    Connor, Martin J.
    Price, Derek
    Gammon, Martin
    Klimowska-Nassar, Natalia
    Burak, Paula
    Day, Emily
    Winkler, Mathias
    Fiorentino, Francesca
    Shah, Taimur
    Ahmed, Hashim Uddin
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 133 (01) : 112 - 117
  • [9] Breast imaging and reporting data system (BIRADS): Magnetic resonance imaging
    Tardivon, Anne A.
    Athanasiou, Alexandra
    Thibault, Fabienne
    El Khoury, Carl
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2007, 61 (02) : 212 - 215
  • [10] Apparent diffusion coefficients in magnetic resonance imaging and prostate imaging reporting and data system score in the canine prostate gland
    Jasinski, T.
    Skierbiszewska, K.
    Domino, M.
    Pawlinski, B.
    Wehrend, A.
    Siewruk, K.
    Ciszkowska, B.
    Gajewska, M.
    Dubiejko, A.
    Gajewski, Z.
    REPRODUCTION IN DOMESTIC ANIMALS, 2018, 53 : 19 - 19