Accuracy and Interobserver Agreement for Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System, Version 2, for the Characterization of Lesions Identified on Multiparametric MRI of the Prostate

被引:51
|
作者
Purysko, Andrei S. [1 ]
Bittencourt, Leonardo K. [2 ]
Bullen, Jennifer A. [3 ]
Mostardeiro, Thomaz R. [4 ]
Herts, Brian R. [1 ]
Klein, Eric A. [5 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin, Imaging Inst, Abdominal Imaging Sect, 9500 Euclid Ave,Mail Code JB 3, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[2] DASA, CDPI Clin, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[3] Cleveland Clin, Dept Quantitat Hlth Sci, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[4] Univ Fed Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil
[5] Cleveland Clin, Glickman Urol & Kidney Inst, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
关键词
MRI; multiparametric MRI; prostate cancer; Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS); PI-RADS V2; CANCER DETECTION; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.16.17289
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The objective of this study was to measure the accuracy and interobserver agreement of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System, version 2 (PI-RADSv2), for the characterization of prostate lesions on multiparametric MRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS. This retrospective study included 170 men examined at a single institution between August 2014 and February 2015 on a 3-T MRI scanner. Study patients were found to have lesions concerning for prostate cancer that were targeted for MRI/transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy. Two experienced readers independently assigned a PI-RADSv2 assessment category to the dominant lesion in each patient. The AUC was calculated to determine reader accuracy for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (Gleason score >= 3 + 4). The Cohen kappa statistic was used to quantify interobserver agreement. RESULTS. The prevalence of clinically significant prostate cancer was 0.36 (61/170 patients). The AUCs for readers 1 and 2 were 0.871 and 0.882, respectively. The AUCs were greater for peripheral zone lesions than for transition zone lesions. When a PI-RADSv2 assessment category >= 3 was considered positive, the agreement between readers was good overall (kappa = 0.63) and was fair for transition zone lesions (kappa = 0.53). When a PI-RADSv2 assessment category >= 4 was considered positive, the agreement was excellent overall (kappa = 0.91) and was excellent for both peripheral zone lesions (kappa = 0.91) and transition zone lesions (kappa = 0.87). CONCLUSION. Two experienced readers were able to accurately identify patients with clinically significant prostate cancer using PI-RADSv2 with good interobserver agreement overall.
引用
收藏
页码:339 / 345
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prostate Cancer: Interobserver Agreement and Accuracy with the Revised Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System at Multiparametric MR Imaging
    Muller, Berrend G.
    Shih, Joanna H.
    Sankineni, Sandeep
    Marko, Jamie
    Rais-Bahrami, Soroush
    George, Arvin Koruthu
    de la Rosette, Jean J. M. C. H.
    Merino, Maria J.
    Wood, Bradford J.
    Pinto, Peter
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Turkbey, Baris
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2015, 277 (03) : 741 - 750
  • [2] Prostate Cancer and Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Category 3 Lesions Identified at Multiparametric Prostate MRI
    Ortman, Michael
    Kasson, Matthew
    Sidana, Abhinav
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2018, 210 (06) : W268 - W268
  • [3] INTERREADER AGREEMENT IN MULTIPARAMETRIC MRI REPORTING USING PROSTATE IMAGING REPORTING AND DATA SYSTEM VERSION 2.1
    Brembilla, Giorgio
    Dell'Oglio, Paolo
    Stabile, Armando
    Damascelli, Anna
    Cristel, Giulia
    Ravelli, Silvia
    Esposito, Antoinio
    Briganti, Alberto
    Montorsi, Francesco
    De Cobelli, Francesco
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 : E849 - E849
  • [4] Reply to "Prostate Cancer and Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Category 3 Lesions Identified at Multiparametric Prostate MRI"
    Sheridan, Alison D.
    Weinreb, Jeffrey C.
    Spektor, Michael
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2018, 210 (06) : W269 - W269
  • [5] Multiparametric MR imaging of the Prostate Interpretation Including Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2
    Furlan, Alessandro
    Borhani, Amir A.
    Westphalen, Antonio C.
    [J]. UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2018, 45 (03) : 439 - +
  • [6] Multiparametric MR imaging of the Prostate Interpretation Including Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2
    Furlan, Alessandro
    Borhani, Amir A.
    Westphalen, Antonio C.
    [J]. RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2018, 56 (02) : 223 - +
  • [7] Risk of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Associated With Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Category 3 (Equivocal) Lesions Identified on Multiparametric Prostate MRI
    Sheridan, Alison D.
    Nath, Sameer K.
    Syed, Jamil S.
    Aneja, Sanjay
    Sprenkle, Preston C.
    Weinreb, Jeffrey C.
    Spektor, Michael
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2018, 210 (02) : 347 - 357
  • [8] Interreader Variability of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 in Detecting and Assessing Prostate Cancer Lesions at Prostate MRI
    Greer, Matthew D.
    Shih, Joanna H.
    Lay, Nathan
    Barrett, Tristan
    Bittencourt, Leonardo
    Borofsky, Samuel
    Kabakus, Ismail
    Law, Yan Mee
    Marko, Jamie
    Shebel, Haytham
    Merino, Maria J.
    Wood, Bradford J.
    Pinto, Peter A.
    Summers, Ronald M.
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Turkbey, Baris
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2019, 212 (06) : 1197 - 1204
  • [9] Prospective evaluation of multiparametric MRI of prostate and the prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) version 2 for prostate cancer detection
    Lim, L. Y.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 26 : 22 - 23
  • [10] Accuracy and Interobserver Agreement of the Correlation Between Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.1 and International Society of Urological Pathology Scores
    Oguzdogan, Gulsen Yucel
    Adibelli, Zehra Hilal
    Sefik, Ertugrul
    Mollamehmetoglu, Hulya
    Bozkurt, Ibrahim Halil
    Vardar, Enver
    Gunlusoy, Bulent
    Tuncez, Hulya Cetin
    [J]. HONG KONG JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2023, 26 (02): : 100 - 110