Prostate Cancer: Interobserver Agreement and Accuracy with the Revised Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System at Multiparametric MR Imaging

被引:275
|
作者
Muller, Berrend G. [1 ,6 ]
Shih, Joanna H. [2 ]
Sankineni, Sandeep [1 ]
Marko, Jamie [7 ]
Rais-Bahrami, Soroush [3 ]
George, Arvin Koruthu [3 ]
de la Rosette, Jean J. M. C. H. [6 ]
Merino, Maria J. [4 ]
Wood, Bradford J. [5 ]
Pinto, Peter [3 ]
Choyke, Peter L. [1 ]
Turkbey, Baris [1 ]
机构
[1] NCI, Mol Imaging Program, NIH, 10 Ctr Dr,MSC 1182,Bldg 10,Room B3B85, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[2] NCI, Biometr Res Branch, Div Canc Treatment & Diag, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[3] NCI, Urol Oncol Branch, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[4] NCI, Pathol Lab, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[5] NCI, Ctr Intervent Oncol, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[6] AMC Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[7] Uniformed Serv Univ Hlth Sci, Dept Radiol & Radiol Sci, Edward Hebert Sch Med, Bethesda, MD 20814 USA
关键词
RADS SCORING SYSTEM; FUSION; BIOPSY; VALIDATION; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2015142818
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate accuracy and interobserver variability with the use of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2.0 for detection of prostate cancer at multiparametric magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in a biopsy-naive patient population. Materials and Methods: This retrospective HIPAA-compliant study was approved by the local ethics committee, and written informed consent was obtained from all patients for use of their imaging and histopathologic data in future research studies. In 101 biopsy-naive patients with elevated prostate-specific antigen levels who underwent multiparametric MR imaging of the prostate and subsequent transrectal ultrasonography (US)-MR imaging fusion-guided biopsy, suspicious lesions detected at multiparametric MR imaging were scored by five readers who were blinded to pathologic results by using to the newly revised PI-RADS and the scoring system developed in-house. Interobserver agreement was evaluated by using k statistics, and the correlation of pathologic results with each of the two scoring systems was evaluated by using the Kendall T correlation coefficient. Results: Specimens of 162 lesions in 94 patients were sampled by means of transrectal US-MR imaging fusion biopsy. Results for 87 (54%) lesions were positive for prostate cancer. Kendall T values with the PI-RADS and the in-house-developed scoring system, respectively, at T2-weighted MR imaging in the peripheral zone were 0.51 and 0.17 and in the transitional zone, 0.45 and 20.11; at diffusion-weighted MR imaging, 0.42 and 0.28; at dynamic contrast material-enhanced MR imaging, 0.23 and 0.24, and overall suspicion scores were 0.42 and 0.49. Median k scores among all possible pairs of readers for PI-RADS and the in-house-developed scoring system, respectively, for T2-weighted MR images in the peripheral zone were 0.47 and 0.15; transitional zone, 0.37 and 0.07; diffusion-weighted MR imaging, 0.41 and 0.57; dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging, 0.48 and 0.41; and overall suspicion scores, 0.46 and 0.55. Conclusion: Use of the revised PI-RADS provides moderately reproducible MR imaging scores for detection of clinically relevant disease. (C) RSNA, 2015
引用
收藏
页码:741 / 750
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Accuracy and Interobserver Agreement for Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System, Version 2, for the Characterization of Lesions Identified on Multiparametric MRI of the Prostate
    Purysko, Andrei S.
    Bittencourt, Leonardo K.
    Bullen, Jennifer A.
    Mostardeiro, Thomaz R.
    Herts, Brian R.
    Klein, Eric A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2017, 209 (02) : 339 - 345
  • [2] Multiparametric MR imaging of the Prostate Interpretation Including Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2
    Furlan, Alessandro
    Borhani, Amir A.
    Westphalen, Antonio C.
    [J]. UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2018, 45 (03) : 439 - +
  • [3] Multiparametric MR imaging of the Prostate Interpretation Including Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2
    Furlan, Alessandro
    Borhani, Amir A.
    Westphalen, Antonio C.
    [J]. RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2018, 56 (02) : 223 - +
  • [4] Comparison between biparametric and multiparametric MR imaging of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.1 in detection of prostate cancer
    EL-Adalany, Mohamed Ali
    Abd EL-Razek, Ahmed Abd E. L-khalek
    EL-Diasty, Tarek
    EL-Hendy, Ahmed
    EL-Metwally, Dina
    [J]. EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2021, 52 (01):
  • [5] Comparison between biparametric and multiparametric MR imaging of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.1 in detection of prostate cancer
    Mohamed Ali EL-Adalany
    Ahmed Abd E L-khalek Abd EL-Razek
    Tarek EL-Diasty
    Ahmed EL-Hendy
    Dina EL-Metwally
    [J]. Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, 52
  • [6] Prostate Cancer Localization Using Multiparametric MR Imaging: Comparison of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) and Likert Scales
    Rosenkrantz, Andrew B.
    Kim, Sooah
    Lim, Ruth P.
    Hindman, Nicole
    Deng, Fang-Ming
    Babb, James S.
    Taneja, Samir S.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2013, 269 (02) : 481 - 491
  • [7] INTERREADER AGREEMENT IN MULTIPARAMETRIC MRI REPORTING USING PROSTATE IMAGING REPORTING AND DATA SYSTEM VERSION 2.1
    Brembilla, Giorgio
    Dell'Oglio, Paolo
    Stabile, Armando
    Damascelli, Anna
    Cristel, Giulia
    Ravelli, Silvia
    Esposito, Antoinio
    Briganti, Alberto
    Montorsi, Francesco
    De Cobelli, Francesco
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 : E849 - E849
  • [8] Prostate Cancer and Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Category 3 Lesions Identified at Multiparametric Prostate MRI
    Ortman, Michael
    Kasson, Matthew
    Sidana, Abhinav
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2018, 210 (06) : W268 - W268
  • [9] Accuracy and Variability of Prostate Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Interpretation Using the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System: A Blinded Comparison of Radiologists
    Pickersgill, Nicholas A.
    Vetter, Joel M.
    Andriole, Gerald L.
    Shetty, Anup S.
    Fowler, Kathryn J.
    Mintz, Aaron J.
    Siegel, Cary L.
    Kim, Eric H.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2020, 6 (02): : 267 - 272
  • [10] Multiparametric MR Imaging of the Prostate after Treatment of Prostate Cancer
    Patel, Pritesh
    Mathew, Melvy S.
    Trilisky, Igor
    Oto, Aytekin
    [J]. RADIOGRAPHICS, 2018, 38 (02) : 437 - 449