Prostate biopsy strategy integrating prostate health index and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging optimizes the predictive value of clinically significant prostate cancer in prostate imaging reporting and data system gray-zone imaging

被引:1
|
作者
Chiu, Shih-Ting [1 ]
Chen, Yu-Ching [2 ]
Huang, Chao-Yuan [1 ]
Cheng, Yung-Ting [3 ]
Pu, Yeong-Shiau [1 ]
Lu, Yu-Chuan [1 ]
Chiang, Chih-Hung [4 ]
Chen, Pei-Ling [1 ]
Chueh, Jeff S. [1 ]
Hong, Jian-Hua [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taiwan Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Taipei, Taiwan
[2] Natl Taiwan Univ Hosp, Dept Med Imaging, Taipei, Taiwan
[3] Natl Taiwan Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Hsin Chu Branch, Hsinchu City, Taiwan
[4] Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Urol Med Res & Educ, Su Ao Branch, Yuan Shan Su Ao Branch, Yi Lan, Taiwan
[5] 7 Zhongshan S Rd, Taipei City 100, Taiwan
关键词
Clinically significant prostate cancer; prostate health index; prostate imaging reporting and data system; prostate magnetic resonance imaging;
D O I
10.4103/UROS.UROS_33_22
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: The Prostate Health Index (PHI) and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) are used as complementary tools for more accurate diagnosis in men with suspected prostate cancer (PCa). This study investigated whether the combination of PHI and mpMRI better predict clinically significant PCa (csPCa), defined as a Gleason score of >7. Materials and Methods: Ninety-four men with clinical suspicion of csPCa were prospectively included. PHI was determined before the prostate biopsy. A uroradiologist reviewed mpMRI findings by using the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2.1 (PI-RADS version 2.1). Fusion-targeted biopsy with systematic biopsy was performed in patients with any suspicious lesions on MRI (PI-RADS assessment category >3), whereas systematic biopsy was performed in patients without suspicious lesions. The diagnostic values of different biomarkers and PI-RADS were compared by the area under the receiver operating curve (area under the curve [AUC]) for detecting csPCa. Results: Forty-nine (52%) patients were diagnosed with csPCa. The csPCa group had higher median PHI and more abnormal MRI findings than did the non-csPCa group. The median total prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level was similar between the PI-RADS 3 and 4 lesion groups. The median PHI values increased and more patients were diagnosed as having csPCa with an increase in PI-RADS. The receiver operating characteristic curve indicated that PHI and MRI (AUC 0.85 and 0.82, respectively) predicted csPCa more accurately than did the total PSA, free PSA ratio, and PSA density. Adding PHI to mpMRI significantly increased the diagnostic accuracy for csPCa (P = 0.004). PHI remained the optimal biomarker in patients with "gray zone" PI-RADS 3 or PI-RADS 4 lesions. Conclusion: PHI can guide decision-making for prostate biopsy for patients with gray-zone mpMRI lesions. We proposed a biopsy strategy incorporating PHI and MRI which resulted in the avoidance of biopsies in 35% of the patients.
引用
收藏
页码:86 / 92
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The predictive value of the prostate health index vs. multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer diagnosis in prostate biopsy
    Jiří Stejskal
    Vanda Adamcová
    Miroslav Záleský
    Vojtěch Novák
    Otakar Čapoun
    Vojtěch Fiala
    Olga Dolejšová
    Hana Sedláčková
    Štěpán Veselý
    Roman Zachoval
    World Journal of Urology, 2021, 39 : 1889 - 1895
  • [2] The predictive value of the prostate health index vs. multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer diagnosis in prostate biopsy
    Stejskal, Jiri
    Adamcova, Vanda
    Zalesky, Miroslav
    Novak, Vojtech
    Capoun, Otakar
    Fiala, Vojtech
    Dolejsova, Olga
    Sedlackova, Hana
    Vesely, Stepan
    Zachoval, Roman
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 39 (06) : 1889 - 1895
  • [3] Negative Predictive Value of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Era: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Sathianathen, Niranjan J.
    Omer, Altan
    Harriss, Eli
    Davies, Lucy
    Kasivisvanathan, Veeru
    Punwani, Shonit
    Moore, Caroline M.
    Kastner, Christof
    Barrett, Tristan
    Van Den Bergh, Roderick C. N.
    Eddy, Ben A.
    Gleeson, Fergus
    Macpherson, Ruth
    Bryant, Richard J.
    Catto, James W. F.
    Murphy, Declan G.
    Hamdy, Freddie C.
    Ahmed, Hashim U.
    Lamb, Alastair D.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2020, 78 (03) : 402 - 414
  • [4] Precision of multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Detection of clinically significant Prostate Cancer
    Krafft, U.
    Borkowetz, A.
    UROLOGE, 2020, 59 (01): : 72 - 77
  • [5] A prospective study of the prostate health index density and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosing clinically significant prostate cancer
    Chen, Yuanchong
    Xu, Dong
    Ruan, Mingjian
    Li, Haixia
    Lin, Guiting
    Song, Gang
    INVESTIGATIVE AND CLINICAL UROLOGY, 2023, 64 (04) : 363 - 372
  • [6] Combining prostate health index and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in an Asian population
    Po-Fan Hsieh
    Wei-Juan Li
    Wei-Ching Lin
    Han Chang
    Chao-Hsiang Chang
    Chi-Ping Huang
    Chi-Rei Yang
    Wen-Chi Chen
    Yi-Huei Chang
    Hsi-Chin Wu
    World Journal of Urology, 2020, 38 : 1207 - 1214
  • [7] Combining prostate health index and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in an Asian population
    Hsieh, Po-Fan
    Li, Wei-Juan
    Lin, Wei-Ching
    Chang, Han
    Chang, Chao-Hsiang
    Huang, Chi-Ping
    Yang, Chi-Rei
    Chen, Wen-Chi
    Chang, Yi-Huei
    Wu, Hsi-Chin
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 38 (05) : 1207 - 1214
  • [8] A PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF THE PROSTATE HEALTH INDEX DENSITY AND MULTIPARAMETRIC MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING IN DIAGNOSING CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT PROSTATE CANCER
    Song, Gang
    Chen, Yuanchong
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 207 (05): : E762 - E762
  • [9] Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Evaluation of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer
    Ingole, Sarang M.
    Mehta, Rajeev U.
    Kazi, Zubair N.
    Bhuyar, Rutuja, V
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND IMAGING, 2021, 31 (01): : 65 - 77
  • [10] COMPARISON OF PROSTATE HEALTH INDEX (PHI) AND MULTIPARAMETRIC MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING (MRI) IN DETECTION OF CLINICALLY-SIGNIFICANT PROSTATE CANCER
    Glaser, Alexander
    Cooper, Phillip
    Roehl, Kimberly
    Catalona, William
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (04): : E162 - E163