Prostate biopsy strategy integrating prostate health index and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging optimizes the predictive value of clinically significant prostate cancer in prostate imaging reporting and data system gray-zone imaging

被引:1
|
作者
Chiu, Shih-Ting [1 ]
Chen, Yu-Ching [2 ]
Huang, Chao-Yuan [1 ]
Cheng, Yung-Ting [3 ]
Pu, Yeong-Shiau [1 ]
Lu, Yu-Chuan [1 ]
Chiang, Chih-Hung [4 ]
Chen, Pei-Ling [1 ]
Chueh, Jeff S. [1 ]
Hong, Jian-Hua [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taiwan Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Taipei, Taiwan
[2] Natl Taiwan Univ Hosp, Dept Med Imaging, Taipei, Taiwan
[3] Natl Taiwan Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Hsin Chu Branch, Hsinchu City, Taiwan
[4] Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Urol Med Res & Educ, Su Ao Branch, Yuan Shan Su Ao Branch, Yi Lan, Taiwan
[5] 7 Zhongshan S Rd, Taipei City 100, Taiwan
关键词
Clinically significant prostate cancer; prostate health index; prostate imaging reporting and data system; prostate magnetic resonance imaging;
D O I
10.4103/UROS.UROS_33_22
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: The Prostate Health Index (PHI) and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) are used as complementary tools for more accurate diagnosis in men with suspected prostate cancer (PCa). This study investigated whether the combination of PHI and mpMRI better predict clinically significant PCa (csPCa), defined as a Gleason score of >7. Materials and Methods: Ninety-four men with clinical suspicion of csPCa were prospectively included. PHI was determined before the prostate biopsy. A uroradiologist reviewed mpMRI findings by using the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2.1 (PI-RADS version 2.1). Fusion-targeted biopsy with systematic biopsy was performed in patients with any suspicious lesions on MRI (PI-RADS assessment category >3), whereas systematic biopsy was performed in patients without suspicious lesions. The diagnostic values of different biomarkers and PI-RADS were compared by the area under the receiver operating curve (area under the curve [AUC]) for detecting csPCa. Results: Forty-nine (52%) patients were diagnosed with csPCa. The csPCa group had higher median PHI and more abnormal MRI findings than did the non-csPCa group. The median total prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level was similar between the PI-RADS 3 and 4 lesion groups. The median PHI values increased and more patients were diagnosed as having csPCa with an increase in PI-RADS. The receiver operating characteristic curve indicated that PHI and MRI (AUC 0.85 and 0.82, respectively) predicted csPCa more accurately than did the total PSA, free PSA ratio, and PSA density. Adding PHI to mpMRI significantly increased the diagnostic accuracy for csPCa (P = 0.004). PHI remained the optimal biomarker in patients with "gray zone" PI-RADS 3 or PI-RADS 4 lesions. Conclusion: PHI can guide decision-making for prostate biopsy for patients with gray-zone mpMRI lesions. We proposed a biopsy strategy incorporating PHI and MRI which resulted in the avoidance of biopsies in 35% of the patients.
引用
收藏
页码:86 / 92
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A Prospective Accuracy Study of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer With Whole-mount Pathology COMMENT
    Purysko, Andrei S.
    UROLOGY, 2019, 123 : 196 - 197
  • [42] Prostate health index can stratify patients with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System score 3 lesions on magnetic resonance imaging to reduce prostate biopsies
    Leung, John Shung-Lai
    Ma, Wai-Kit
    Ho, Brian Sze-Ho
    Chun, Stacia Tsun-Tsun
    Na, Rong
    Zhan, Yongle
    Ng, Chi-Yuen
    Ip, Chi-Ho
    Ng, Ada Tsui-Lin
    Lam, Yiu-Chung
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2024, 26 (01): : 20 - 24
  • [43] Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging predicts the presence of prostate cancer in patients with negative prostate biopsy
    Lista, F.
    Castillo, E.
    Gimbernat, H.
    Rodriguez-Barbero, J. M.
    Panizo, J.
    Angulo, J. C.
    ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS, 2015, 39 (02): : 85 - 91
  • [44] Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate
    Scappatura, Giuseppe
    RADIOLOGIC TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 93 (02) : 221 - 227
  • [45] The Utility of Combined Target and Systematic Prostate Biopsies in the Diagnosis of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Using Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 Based on Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Kato, Daiki
    Ozawa, Kaori
    Takeuchi, Shinichi
    Kawase, Makoto
    Kawase, Kota
    Nakai, Chie
    Takai, Manabu
    Iinuma, Koji
    Nakane, Keita
    Kato, Hiroki
    Matsuo, Masayuki
    Suzui, Natsuko
    Miyazaki, Tatsuhiko
    Koie, Takuya
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2021, 28 (02) : 1294 - 1301
  • [46] Prostate Cancer: Interobserver Agreement and Accuracy with the Revised Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System at Multiparametric MR Imaging
    Muller, Berrend G.
    Shih, Joanna H.
    Sankineni, Sandeep
    Marko, Jamie
    Rais-Bahrami, Soroush
    George, Arvin Koruthu
    de la Rosette, Jean J. M. C. H.
    Merino, Maria J.
    Wood, Bradford J.
    Pinto, Peter
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Turkbey, Baris
    RADIOLOGY, 2015, 277 (03) : 741 - 750
  • [47] Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Outperforms the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial Risk Calculator in Predicting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer
    Salami, Simpa S.
    Vira, Manish A.
    Turkbey, Baris
    Fakhoury, Mathew
    Yaskiv, Oksana
    Villani, Robert
    Ben-Levi, Eran
    Rastinehad, Ardeshir R.
    CANCER, 2014, 120 (18) : 2876 - 2882
  • [48] Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate
    Oliveira Neto, Jaime Araujo
    Parente, Daniella Braz
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2013, 21 (02) : 409 - +
  • [49] Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer by transperineal multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion targeted prostate biopsy in smaller prostates
    Dahl, Douglas M.
    Kim, Michelle M.
    Wu, Shulin
    Lin, Sharron X.
    Crotty, Rory K.
    Cornejo, Kristine M.
    Harisinghani, Mukesh G.
    Feldman, Adam S.
    Wu, Chin-Lee
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2022, 40 (10) : 451.e9 - 451.e14
  • [50] Accuracy and Variability of Prostate Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Interpretation Using the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System: A Blinded Comparison of Radiologists
    Pickersgill, Nicholas A.
    Vetter, Joel M.
    Andriole, Gerald L.
    Shetty, Anup S.
    Fowler, Kathryn J.
    Mintz, Aaron J.
    Siegel, Cary L.
    Kim, Eric H.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2020, 6 (02): : 267 - 272