Prostate biopsy strategy integrating prostate health index and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging optimizes the predictive value of clinically significant prostate cancer in prostate imaging reporting and data system gray-zone imaging

被引:1
|
作者
Chiu, Shih-Ting [1 ]
Chen, Yu-Ching [2 ]
Huang, Chao-Yuan [1 ]
Cheng, Yung-Ting [3 ]
Pu, Yeong-Shiau [1 ]
Lu, Yu-Chuan [1 ]
Chiang, Chih-Hung [4 ]
Chen, Pei-Ling [1 ]
Chueh, Jeff S. [1 ]
Hong, Jian-Hua [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taiwan Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Taipei, Taiwan
[2] Natl Taiwan Univ Hosp, Dept Med Imaging, Taipei, Taiwan
[3] Natl Taiwan Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Hsin Chu Branch, Hsinchu City, Taiwan
[4] Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Urol Med Res & Educ, Su Ao Branch, Yuan Shan Su Ao Branch, Yi Lan, Taiwan
[5] 7 Zhongshan S Rd, Taipei City 100, Taiwan
关键词
Clinically significant prostate cancer; prostate health index; prostate imaging reporting and data system; prostate magnetic resonance imaging;
D O I
10.4103/UROS.UROS_33_22
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: The Prostate Health Index (PHI) and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) are used as complementary tools for more accurate diagnosis in men with suspected prostate cancer (PCa). This study investigated whether the combination of PHI and mpMRI better predict clinically significant PCa (csPCa), defined as a Gleason score of >7. Materials and Methods: Ninety-four men with clinical suspicion of csPCa were prospectively included. PHI was determined before the prostate biopsy. A uroradiologist reviewed mpMRI findings by using the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2.1 (PI-RADS version 2.1). Fusion-targeted biopsy with systematic biopsy was performed in patients with any suspicious lesions on MRI (PI-RADS assessment category >3), whereas systematic biopsy was performed in patients without suspicious lesions. The diagnostic values of different biomarkers and PI-RADS were compared by the area under the receiver operating curve (area under the curve [AUC]) for detecting csPCa. Results: Forty-nine (52%) patients were diagnosed with csPCa. The csPCa group had higher median PHI and more abnormal MRI findings than did the non-csPCa group. The median total prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level was similar between the PI-RADS 3 and 4 lesion groups. The median PHI values increased and more patients were diagnosed as having csPCa with an increase in PI-RADS. The receiver operating characteristic curve indicated that PHI and MRI (AUC 0.85 and 0.82, respectively) predicted csPCa more accurately than did the total PSA, free PSA ratio, and PSA density. Adding PHI to mpMRI significantly increased the diagnostic accuracy for csPCa (P = 0.004). PHI remained the optimal biomarker in patients with "gray zone" PI-RADS 3 or PI-RADS 4 lesions. Conclusion: PHI can guide decision-making for prostate biopsy for patients with gray-zone mpMRI lesions. We proposed a biopsy strategy incorporating PHI and MRI which resulted in the avoidance of biopsies in 35% of the patients.
引用
收藏
页码:86 / 92
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Clinical value of prostate health index as an indicator for recommending magnetic resonance imaging in patients with gray-zone prostate-specific antigen level
    Byeongdo Song
    Sang Hun Song
    Sung Il Hwang
    Hak Jong Lee
    Hakmin Lee
    Sung Kyu Hong
    Seok-Soo Byun
    Sangchul Lee
    World Journal of Urology, 2023, 41 : 3519 - 3526
  • [22] Multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of prostate cancer
    Turkbey, Baris
    Brown, Anna M.
    Sankineni, Sandeep
    Wood, Bradford J.
    Pinto, Peter A.
    Choyke, Peter L.
    CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2016, 66 (04) : 326 - 336
  • [23] Prostate Cancer Detection with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 1 versus Version 2
    Feng, Zhao-Yan
    Wang, Liang
    Min, Xiang-De
    Wang, Shao-Gang
    Wang, Guo-Ping
    Cai, Jie
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 129 (20) : 2451 - 2459
  • [24] Prostate Cancer Detection with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 1 versus Version 2
    Feng ZhaoYan
    Wang Liang
    Min XiangDe
    Wang ShaoGang
    Wang GuoPing
    Cai Jie
    中华医学杂志英文版, 2016, 129 (20)
  • [25] WHAT IS THE PREDICTIVE VALUE OF A NEGATIVE MULTIPARAMETRIC MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING IN EXCLUDING PROSTATE CANCER AT BIOPSY?
    Lopez del Campo, Ricardo
    Cuadras Sole, Merce
    Miret Alomar, Enric
    Salazar Gabarro, Aina
    Roche Valles, Sarai
    Regis Placido, Lucas
    Celma Domenech, Ana
    Lorente Garcia, David
    Placer Santos, Jose
    Planas Morin, Jacques
    Trilla Herrera, Enrique
    Morote Robles, Juan
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 199 (04): : E484 - E484
  • [26] Preoperative prostate biopsy and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: reliability in detecting prostate cancer
    Porpiglia, Francesco
    Russo, Filippo
    Manfredi, Matteo
    Mele, Fabrizio
    Fiori, Cristian
    Regge, Daniele
    International Braz J Urol, 2015, 41 (01): : 124 - 133
  • [27] The Value of Prostate-specific Antigen Density for Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System 3 Lesions on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Strategy to Avoid Unnecessary Prostate Biopsies
    Goertz, Magdalena
    Radtke, Jan Philipp
    Hatiboglu, Gencay
    Schuetz, Viktoria
    Tosev, Georgi
    Guettlein, Maximilian
    Leichsenring, Jonas
    Stenzinger, Albrecht
    Bonekamp, David
    Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter
    Hohenfellner, Markus
    Nyarangi-Dix, Joanne Nyaboe
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2021, 7 (02): : 325 - 331
  • [28] CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT PROSTATE CANCER DETECTION RATE OF PROSTATE IMAGING REPORTING AND DATA SYSTEM SCORE 4 IN THE PERIPHERAL ZONE
    Song, Gang
    Sun, Zhoujie
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 207 (05): : E897 - E897
  • [29] A Prospective Accuracy Study of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer With Whole-mount Pathology
    Giannarini, Gianluca
    Girometti, Rossano
    Crestani, Alessandro
    Rossanese, Marta
    Calandriello, Mettle
    Cereser, Lorenzo
    Bednarova, Sandra
    Battistella, Claudio
    Sioletic, Stefano
    Zuiani, Chiara
    Valotto, Claudio
    Ficarra, Vincenzo
    UROLOGY, 2019, 123 : 191 - 196
  • [30] The multiparametric prostate resonance imaging with the prostate imaging-reporting and data system (PI-RADS): the state of art of prostate cancer diagnosis
    Favorito, Luciano Alves
    INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2019, 45 (03): : 422 - 423