Detection of the irrotational boundary using machine learning methods

被引:1
|
作者
Tao, Shancong [1 ]
Xie, Yuanliang [1 ]
Shi, Xiaotian [2 ]
Zhou, Yi [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Energy & Power Engn, Nanjing 210094, Peoples R China
[2] China Acad Aerosp Aerodynam, Inst 2, Beijing 100074, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
TURBULENT/NON-TURBULENT INTERFACE; IDENTIFICATION; ENTRAINMENT; LAYERS; FLOWS; FIELD;
D O I
10.1063/5.0214605
中图分类号
O3 [力学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0801 ;
摘要
Four machine learning methods, i.e., self-organizing map (SOM), Gaussian mixture model (GMM), eXtreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and contrastive learning (CL), are used to detect the irrotational boundary (IB), which represents the outer edge of the turbulent and non-turbulent interface layer. To accurately evaluate the detection methods, high-resolution databases from direct numerical simulations of a temporally evolving turbulent plane jet are used. It is found that except for the SOM method, the general contour of the IB appears to be effectively captured using the GMM, XGBoost, and CL methods, which indicate the turbulent and non-turbulent regions can be roughly recognized. Furthermore, the intrinsic features of the detected IB using the GMM, XGBoost, and the CL methods are quantitatively evaluated. Unlike the conventional vorticity norm method, the three machine learning methods do not rely on a single threshold of vorticity magnitude to separate the turbulent and non-turbulent regions. A small part of the detected IB using the three machine learning methods is characterized by the rotational motions, which are expected to be only found inside the turbulent sublayer and turbulent core region. Compared to the vorticity norm and XGBoost methods, the fractal dimensions of the IB detected by the GMM and CL methods are relatively small, which are related to the missing detection of some highly contorted elements. With the three machine learning methods, a large part of the detected IB is characterized by a convex shape, similarly as with the vorticity norm. However, the probability density function profiles of the local curvature of the detected IB differ greatly between the three machine learning methods and the vorticity norm. A mild variation of the mean conditional distributions of the vorticity magnitude can be observed across the detected IB by the three machine learning methods. This study first implies that using the machine learning methods the turbulent and non-turbulent regions can be roughly distinguished, but it is still challenging to obtain the intrinsic features of the detected IB.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A new hybrid approach for intrusion detection using machine learning methods
    Cavusoglu, Unal
    APPLIED INTELLIGENCE, 2019, 49 (07) : 2735 - 2761
  • [32] A Stylometric Approach for Reliable News Detection Using Machine Learning Methods
    Abeynayake, A. D. L.
    Sunethra, A. A.
    Deshani, K. A. D.
    2022 22ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN ICT FOR EMERGING REGIONS (ICTER), 2022,
  • [33] DDoS Attacks Detection by Using Machine Learning Methods on Online Systems
    Baskaya, Dilek
    Samet, Refi
    2020 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING (UBMK), 2020, : 52 - 57
  • [34] Detection of factors affecting kidney function using machine learning methods
    Haratian, Arezoo
    Maleki, Zeinab
    Shayegh, Farzaneh
    Safaeian, Alireza
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01):
  • [35] Satire Detection from Web Documents using machine Learning Methods
    Ahmad, Tanvir
    Akhtar, Halima
    Chopra, Akshay
    Akhtar, Mohd Waris
    2014 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFT COMPUTING & MACHINE INTELLIGENCE ISCMI 2014, 2014, : 102 - 105
  • [36] Detection of coronavirus disease using texture analysis and machine learning methods
    Bourouis, Sami
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT ENGINEERING INFORMATICS, 2022, 10 (03) : 196 - 211
  • [37] Detection of Cardiovascular Diseases in ECG Images Using Machine Learning and Deep Learning Methods
    Abubaker M.B.
    Babayigit B.
    IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence, 2023, 4 (02): : 373 - 382
  • [38] Hate Speech Detection in Social Networks using Machine Learning and Deep Learning Methods
    Toktarova, Aigerim
    Syrlybay, Dariga
    Myrzakhmetova, Bayan
    Anuarbekova, Gulzat
    Rakhimbayeva, Gulbarshin
    Zhylanbaeva, Balkiya
    Suieuova, Nabat
    Kerimbekov, Mukhtar
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED COMPUTER SCIENCE AND APPLICATIONS, 2023, 14 (05) : 396 - 406
  • [39] Auditory Brainstem Response Detection Using Machine Learning: A Comparison With Statistical Detection Methods
    McKearney, Richard M.
    Bell, Steven L.
    Chesnaye, Michael A.
    Simpson, David M.
    EAR AND HEARING, 2022, 43 (03): : 949 - 960
  • [40] ANALYSIS OF MACHINE LEARNING METHODS ON MALWARE DETECTION
    Aydogan, Emre
    Sen, Sevil
    2014 22ND SIGNAL PROCESSING AND COMMUNICATIONS APPLICATIONS CONFERENCE (SIU), 2014, : 2066 - 2069