Auditory Brainstem Response Detection Using Machine Learning: A Comparison With Statistical Detection Methods

被引:8
|
作者
McKearney, Richard M. [1 ]
Bell, Steven L. [1 ]
Chesnaye, Michael A. [1 ]
Simpson, David M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southampton, Fac Engn & Phys Sci, Inst Sound & Vibrat Res, Southampton SO17 1BJ, Hants, England
来源
EAR AND HEARING | 2022年 / 43卷 / 03期
关键词
Auditory brainstem response; Evoked potentials; Objective detection methods; Machine learning; OBJECTIVE DETECTION; EVOKED-POTENTIALS; CLASSIFICATION; TESTS; TIME;
D O I
10.1097/AUD.0000000000001151
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Objectives: The primary objective of this study was to train and test machine learning algorithms to be able to detect accurately whether EEG data contains an auditory brainstem response (ABR) or not and recommend suitable machine learning methods. In addition, the performance of the best machine learning algorithm was compared with that of prominent statistical detection methods. Design: Four machine learning algorithms were trained and evaluated using nested k-fold cross-validation: a random forest, a convolutional long short-term memory network, a stacked ensemble, and a multilayer perceptron. The best method was evaluated on a separate test set and compared with conventional detection methods: Fsp, Fmp, q-sample uniform scores test, and Hotelling's T-2 test. The models were trained and tested on simulated data that were generated based on recorded ABRs collected from 12 normal-hearing participants and no-stimulus EEG data from 15 participants. Simulation allowed the ground truth of the data ("response present" or "response absent") to be known. Results: The sensitivity of the best machine learning algorithm, a stacked ensemble, was significantly greater than that of the conventional detection methods evaluated. The stacked ensemble, evaluated using a bootstrap approach, consistently achieved a high and stable level of specificity across ensemble sizes. Conclusions: The stacked ensemble model presented was more effective than conventional statistical ABR detection methods and the alternative machine learning approaches tested. The stacked ensemble detection method may have potential both in automated ABR screening devices as well as in evoked potential software, assisting clinicians in making decisions regarding a patient's ABR threshold. Further assessment of the model's generalizability using a large cohort of subject recorded data, including participants of different ages and hearing status, is a recommended next step.
引用
收藏
页码:949 / 960
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Objective auditory brainstem response classification using machine learning
    McKearney, Richard M.
    MacKinnon, Robert C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2019, 58 (04) : 224 - 230
  • [2] Auditory Brainstem Response at the Detection Limit
    Bernd Lütkenhöner
    Annemarie Seither-Preisler
    Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 2008, 9 : 521 - 531
  • [3] Auditory Brainstem Response at the Detection Limit
    Luetkenhoener, Bernd
    Seither-Preisler, Annemarie
    JARO-JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2008, 9 (04): : 521 - 531
  • [4] Research using neural networks for auditory brainstem response detection
    Tian, JL
    Gronfors, T
    Juhola, M
    MEDICAL INFORMATICS EUROPE '96: HUMAN FACETS IN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, 1996, 34 : 791 - 795
  • [5] Objective detection of auditory brainstem potentials -: Comparison of statistical tests in the time and frequency domains
    Cebulla, M
    Stürzebecher, E
    Wernecke, KD
    SCANDINAVIAN AUDIOLOGY, 2000, 29 (01): : 44 - 51
  • [6] Detection of the binaural interaction component in the auditory brainstem response
    Stollman, MHP
    Snik, AFM
    Hombergen, GCJH
    Nieuwenhuys, R
    tenKoppel, P
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 1996, 30 (03): : 227 - 232
  • [7] Optimising weighted averaging for auditory brainstem response detection
    McKearney, Richard M.
    Bell, Steven L.
    Chesnaye, Michael A.
    Simpson, David M.
    BIOMEDICAL SIGNAL PROCESSING AND CONTROL, 2023, 83
  • [8] QUICKEST MEAL DETECTION USING STATISTICAL MACHINE LEARNING
    Tabella, G.
    Siddiqui, S.
    Rossi, P.
    DIABETES TECHNOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2022, 24 : A230 - A230
  • [9] Comparison of Machine Learning Methods for Code Smell Detection Using Reduced Features
    Karaduzovic-Hadziabdic, Kanita
    Spahic, Rialda
    2018 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING (UBMK), 2018, : 670 - 672
  • [10] Auditory brainstem response - A comparison of different interpretation strategies for detection of cerebellopontine angle tumors
    Stanton, SG
    Cashman, MZ
    SCANDINAVIAN AUDIOLOGY, 1996, 25 (02): : 109 - 120