Detection of the irrotational boundary using machine learning methods

被引:1
|
作者
Tao, Shancong [1 ]
Xie, Yuanliang [1 ]
Shi, Xiaotian [2 ]
Zhou, Yi [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Energy & Power Engn, Nanjing 210094, Peoples R China
[2] China Acad Aerosp Aerodynam, Inst 2, Beijing 100074, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
TURBULENT/NON-TURBULENT INTERFACE; IDENTIFICATION; ENTRAINMENT; LAYERS; FLOWS; FIELD;
D O I
10.1063/5.0214605
中图分类号
O3 [力学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0801 ;
摘要
Four machine learning methods, i.e., self-organizing map (SOM), Gaussian mixture model (GMM), eXtreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and contrastive learning (CL), are used to detect the irrotational boundary (IB), which represents the outer edge of the turbulent and non-turbulent interface layer. To accurately evaluate the detection methods, high-resolution databases from direct numerical simulations of a temporally evolving turbulent plane jet are used. It is found that except for the SOM method, the general contour of the IB appears to be effectively captured using the GMM, XGBoost, and CL methods, which indicate the turbulent and non-turbulent regions can be roughly recognized. Furthermore, the intrinsic features of the detected IB using the GMM, XGBoost, and the CL methods are quantitatively evaluated. Unlike the conventional vorticity norm method, the three machine learning methods do not rely on a single threshold of vorticity magnitude to separate the turbulent and non-turbulent regions. A small part of the detected IB using the three machine learning methods is characterized by the rotational motions, which are expected to be only found inside the turbulent sublayer and turbulent core region. Compared to the vorticity norm and XGBoost methods, the fractal dimensions of the IB detected by the GMM and CL methods are relatively small, which are related to the missing detection of some highly contorted elements. With the three machine learning methods, a large part of the detected IB is characterized by a convex shape, similarly as with the vorticity norm. However, the probability density function profiles of the local curvature of the detected IB differ greatly between the three machine learning methods and the vorticity norm. A mild variation of the mean conditional distributions of the vorticity magnitude can be observed across the detected IB by the three machine learning methods. This study first implies that using the machine learning methods the turbulent and non-turbulent regions can be roughly distinguished, but it is still challenging to obtain the intrinsic features of the detected IB.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Vortex and Core Detection using Computer Vision and Machine Learning Methods
    Xu, Zhenguo
    Maria, Ayush
    Chelli, Kahina
    De Premare, Thibaut Dumouchel
    Bilbao, Xabadin
    Petit, Christopher
    Zoumboulis-Airey, Robert
    Moulitsas, Irene
    Teschner, Tom
    Asif, Seemal
    Li, Jun
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL MECHANICS, 2023, 32 (05): : 467 - 493
  • [22] A new hybrid approach for intrusion detection using machine learning methods
    Ünal Çavuşoğlu
    Applied Intelligence, 2019, 49 : 2735 - 2761
  • [23] Ischemic heart disease detection using selected machine learning methods
    Ciecholewski, Marcin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER MATHEMATICS, 2013, 90 (08) : 1734 - 1759
  • [24] Research Trend Analysis for Fault Detection Methods Using Machine Learning
    Bae, Wooram
    Ha, Wansoo
    ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY, 2020, 53 (04): : 479 - 489
  • [25] Detection of factors affecting kidney function using machine learning methods
    Arezoo Haratian
    Zeinab Maleki
    Farzaneh Shayegh
    Alireza Safaeian
    Scientific Reports, 12 (1)
  • [26] Overview of Machine Learning Methods for Stroke Detection using Weather Data
    Ploscar, Andreea Alina
    Marc, Anastasia-Daria
    Aldea, Cristina Caterina
    Coroiu, Adriana Mihaela
    2023 25TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SYMBOLIC AND NUMERIC ALGORITHMS FOR SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING, SYNASC 2023, 2023, : 324 - 331
  • [27] Microaneurysm Detection Using Principal Component Analysis and Machine Learning Methods
    Cao, Wen
    Czarnek, Nicholas
    Shan, Juan
    Li, Lin
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NANOBIOSCIENCE, 2018, 17 (03) : 191 - 198
  • [28] Detection of different windows PE malware using machine learning methods
    Kocak, Aynur
    Sogut, Esra
    Alkan, Mustafa
    Erdem, O. Ayhan
    JOURNAL OF POLYTECHNIC-POLITEKNIK DERGISI, 2023, 26 (03): : 1185 - 1197
  • [29] Oceanic eddy detection and lifetime forecast using machine learning methods
    Ashkezari, Mohammad D.
    Hill, Christopher N.
    Follett, Christopher N.
    Forget, Gael
    Follows, Michael J.
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2016, 43 (23) : 12234 - 12241
  • [30] Personalized seizure detection using wearable ECG and machine learning methods
    Jeppesen, J.
    Christensen, J.
    Johansen, P.
    Beniczky, S.
    EPILEPSIA, 2023, 64 : 71 - 71