Detection of the irrotational boundary using machine learning methods

被引:1
|
作者
Tao, Shancong [1 ]
Xie, Yuanliang [1 ]
Shi, Xiaotian [2 ]
Zhou, Yi [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Energy & Power Engn, Nanjing 210094, Peoples R China
[2] China Acad Aerosp Aerodynam, Inst 2, Beijing 100074, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
TURBULENT/NON-TURBULENT INTERFACE; IDENTIFICATION; ENTRAINMENT; LAYERS; FLOWS; FIELD;
D O I
10.1063/5.0214605
中图分类号
O3 [力学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0801 ;
摘要
Four machine learning methods, i.e., self-organizing map (SOM), Gaussian mixture model (GMM), eXtreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and contrastive learning (CL), are used to detect the irrotational boundary (IB), which represents the outer edge of the turbulent and non-turbulent interface layer. To accurately evaluate the detection methods, high-resolution databases from direct numerical simulations of a temporally evolving turbulent plane jet are used. It is found that except for the SOM method, the general contour of the IB appears to be effectively captured using the GMM, XGBoost, and CL methods, which indicate the turbulent and non-turbulent regions can be roughly recognized. Furthermore, the intrinsic features of the detected IB using the GMM, XGBoost, and the CL methods are quantitatively evaluated. Unlike the conventional vorticity norm method, the three machine learning methods do not rely on a single threshold of vorticity magnitude to separate the turbulent and non-turbulent regions. A small part of the detected IB using the three machine learning methods is characterized by the rotational motions, which are expected to be only found inside the turbulent sublayer and turbulent core region. Compared to the vorticity norm and XGBoost methods, the fractal dimensions of the IB detected by the GMM and CL methods are relatively small, which are related to the missing detection of some highly contorted elements. With the three machine learning methods, a large part of the detected IB is characterized by a convex shape, similarly as with the vorticity norm. However, the probability density function profiles of the local curvature of the detected IB differ greatly between the three machine learning methods and the vorticity norm. A mild variation of the mean conditional distributions of the vorticity magnitude can be observed across the detected IB by the three machine learning methods. This study first implies that using the machine learning methods the turbulent and non-turbulent regions can be roughly distinguished, but it is still challenging to obtain the intrinsic features of the detected IB.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Machine Learning Methods for Software Vulnerability Detection
    Chernis, Boris
    Verma, Rakesh
    IWSPA '18: PROCEEDINGS OF THE FOURTH ACM INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON SECURITY AND PRIVACY ANALYTICS, 2018, : 31 - 39
  • [42] Detection of Network Anomalies with Machine Learning Methods
    Kara, Ihsan Riza
    Varol, Asaf
    2022 10TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON DIGITAL FORENSICS AND SECURITY (ISDFS), 2022,
  • [43] Machine Learning Methods for Automatic Gender Detection
    Morales Sanchez, Damian
    Moreno, Antonio
    Jimenez Lopez, M. Dolores
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TOOLS, 2022, 31 (03)
  • [44] Geological Fractures Detection by Methods of Machine Learning
    M. V. Muratov
    V. A. Biryukov
    I. B. Petrov
    Lobachevskii Journal of Mathematics, 2020, 41 : 533 - 537
  • [45] Geological Fractures Detection by Methods of Machine Learning
    Muratov, M. V.
    Biryukov, V. A.
    Petrov, I. B.
    LOBACHEVSKII JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS, 2020, 41 (04) : 533 - 537
  • [46] A Machine Learning Methods: Outlier detection in WSN
    Ayadi, Hayfa
    Zouinkhi, Ahmed
    Boussaid, Boumedyen
    Abdelkrim, M. Naceur
    2015 16TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SCIENCES AND TECHNIQUES OF AUTOMATIC CONTROL AND COMPUTER ENGINEERING (STA), 2015, : 722 - 727
  • [47] A review of ADHD detection studies with machine learning methods using rsfMRI data
    Taspinar, Gurcan
    Ozkurt, Nalan
    NMR IN BIOMEDICINE, 2024, 37 (08)
  • [48] Anomaly Detection in 6G Networks Using Machine Learning Methods
    Saeed, Mamoon M.
    Saeed, Rashid A.
    Abdelhaq, Maha
    Alsaqour, Raed
    Hasan, Mohammad Kamrul
    Mokhtar, Rania A.
    ELECTRONICS, 2023, 12 (15)
  • [49] Proximal Methods for Plant Stress Detection Using Optical Sensors and Machine Learning
    Zubler, Alanna V.
    Yoon, Jeong-Yeol
    BIOSENSORS-BASEL, 2020, 10 (12):
  • [50] Detection of Olfactory Stimulus in Electroencephalogram Signals Using Machine and Deep Learning Methods
    Akbugday, Burak
    Akbugday, Sude Pehlivan
    Sadikzade, Riza
    Akan, Aydin
    Unal, Sevtap
    ELECTRICA, 2024, 24 (01): : 175 - 182