COMPARISON OF E-TEST WITH BROTH MICRODILUTION AND DISK DIFFUSION FOR SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING OF CORYNEFORM BACTERIA

被引:0
|
作者
MARTINEZMARTINEZ, L [1 ]
ORTEGA, MC [1 ]
SUAREZ, AI [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV HOSP VIRGEN MACARENA,DEPT MICROBIOL,E-41080 SEVILLE,SPAIN
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The susceptibilities of 135 coryneform bacteria isolated from clinical samples to ampicillin (AMP), cephalothin (CR), cefoxitin (FOX), cefotaxime (CTX), erythromycin (E), ciprofloxacin (CIP), tetracycline (TE), amikacin (AK), vancomycin (VA), and rifampin (R) were determined by disk diffusion, broth microdilution, and the E-test. The following species (number of isolates in parentheses) were included: Corynebacterium urealyticum (30), Corynebacterium minutissimum (20), coryneform CDC group ANF-1 (20), Corynebacterium striatum (20), Corynebacterium jeikeium (15), coryneform CDC group I2 (8), Listeria monocytogenes (7), Corynebacterium xerosis (5), and other coryneform bacteria (10). Agreement within one twofold dilution between the E-test and broth microdilution was 31% (VA), 64% (AK), 71% (CTX), 77% (FOX and CIP), 79% (TE), 84% (AMP), 87% (E), and 88% (CR and R). For the 1,350 combinations of microorganisms and antimicrobial agents, 85 (6.3%) discrepancies in interpretive category were found (4.2% minor, 1.2% major, and 0.9% very major). Seventy (5.1%) disagreements in interpretive category were found between disk diffusion and the E-test (3.8% minor, 0.4% major, and 0.9% very major), and 85 (6.3%) disagreements were found between microdilution (reference method) and disk diffusion (4.2% minor, 0.5% major, and 1.5% very major). MICs obtained with the E-test were highly reproducible, No category discrepancy was observed for VA, despite quantitative results. Considering interpretive categories, there is a good overall agreement between the three methods studied here, but further evaluation of current methodologies for susceptibility testing is required when considering coryneform bacteria and determination of quantitative activity of antimicrobial agents.
引用
收藏
页码:1318 / 1321
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] In vitro susceptibility testing of Geotrichum capitatum:: Comparison of the E-test, disk diffusion, and sensititre colorimetric methods in the NCCLS M27-A2 broth microdilution reference method
    Girmenia, C
    Pizzarelli, G
    D'Antonio, D
    Cristini, F
    Martino, P
    [J]. ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2003, 47 (12) : 3985 - 3988
  • [22] Susceptibility testing of fluconazole by the NCCLS broth macrodilution method, E-test, and disk diffusion for application in the routine laboratory
    Vandenbossche, I
    Vaneechoutte, M
    Vandevenne, M
    De Baere, T
    Verschraegen, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2002, 40 (03) : 918 - 921
  • [23] In vitro Susceptibility Testing of Clinical Zygomyceteous Species isolated in Cairo, Egypt against Ten Antifungal Agents by Broth Microdilution, Disk Diffusion and E-test Methods
    ElKholy, Iman M.
    Zaki, Sh. M.
    Mohamed, S. S.
    Wasfy, Walaa M.
    [J]. EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2016, 56 (01): : 255 - 267
  • [24] Levofloxacin Susceptibility Testing for Helicobacter pylori in China: Comparison of E-Test and Disk Diffusion Method
    Yu, Chaohui
    Li, Lan
    Chen, Wenguo
    Jiao, Yangwen
    Yang, Ningmin
    Yang, En
    Zhang, Jianzhong
    Chen, Lihua
    Li, Youming
    [J]. HELICOBACTER, 2011, 16 (02) : 119 - 123
  • [25] Comparison of E-Test®, disk diffusion and a modified CLSI broth microdilution (M38-A) method for in vitro testing of itraconazole, fluconazole and voriconazole against dermatophytes
    Mendez, Carmen Castro
    Serrano, Maria Carmen
    Valverde, Anastasio
    Peman, Javier
    Almeida, Carmen
    Martin-Mazuelos, Estrella
    [J]. MEDICAL MYCOLOGY, 2008, 46 (02) : 119 - 123
  • [26] Correlation between microdilution, E-test, and disk diffusion methods for antifungal susceptibility testing of posaconazole against Candida spp.
    Sims, Charles R.
    Paetznick, Victor L.
    Rodriguez, Jose R.
    Chen, Enuo
    Ostrosky-Zeichner, Luis
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2006, 44 (06) : 2105 - 2108
  • [27] Comparison of agar dilution, broth dilution, disk diffusion, and the E-test for susceptibility testing of penicillin-susceptible and penicillin-resistantStreptococcus pneumoniae
    J. Thorvilson
    P. Kohner
    N. Henry
    F. Cockerill
    [J]. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, 1997, 16 : 391 - 394
  • [28] Comparison of disk diffusion, MIC test strip and broth microdilution methods for cefiderocol susceptibility testing on carbapenem-resistant enterobacterales
    Bonnin, Remy A.
    Emeraud, Cecile
    Jousset, Agnes B.
    Naas, Thierry
    Dortet, Laurent
    [J]. CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2022, 28 (08) : 1156.e1 - 1156.e5
  • [29] Comparison of Broth Microdilution Method with BD Phoenix, Micro Scan and E-test for Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales: Colistin Susceptibility Testing
    Yis, Reyhan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC RESEARCH IN MEDICINE-JAREM, 2022, 12 (02): : 61 - 65
  • [30] COMPARISON OF BROTH MICRODILUTION AND E-TEST METHODS FOR THE ANTIFUNGAL SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING OF CANDIDA SPP. STRAINS ISOLATED FROM BLOOD CULTURES
    Ozcan, Sema Keceli
    Mutlu, Birsen
    Dundar, Devrim
    Willke, Ayse
    [J]. MIKROBIYOLOJI BULTENI, 2010, 44 (02): : 263 - 271