Comparison of Broth Microdilution Method with BD Phoenix, Micro Scan and E-test for Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales: Colistin Susceptibility Testing

被引:1
|
作者
Yis, Reyhan [1 ]
机构
[1] Izmir Bakircay Univ, Fac Med, Dept Med Microbiol, Izmir, Turkey
来源
关键词
Colistin susceptibility; carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales; broth microdilution; AGAR DILUTION; POLYMYXIN-B; VITEK; ETEST; DIFFUSION;
D O I
10.4274/jarem.galenos.2022.70299
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: In the past years, due to the increasing carbapenem resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) infection rates, colistin use has been on the rise. Multi-drug resistant Gram-negative bacteria and colistin resistance are increasing simultaneously; therefore, an accurate method for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of colistin is crucial. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing recommend the standard broth microdilution (BMD) method for colistin minimum inhibitory concentration testing. In this study, we aimed to examine the performance of BD Phoenix, MicroScan, and E-tests on CRE isolates on the determination of colistin susceptibility. The existing commercial tests were compared to the reference BMD method. Methods: One hundred and twenty non-duplicate clinical Enterobacterales isolates such as Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae), Escherichia coli (E. coli), Enterobacter cloace (E. cloacae) were collected between August 2017 to June 2018. The BD Phoenix, MicroScan systems, and E-tests were used to test colistin susceptibility. Commercial methods were compared with the reference method BMD. Results: Colistin susceptibility was evaluated in 120 Gram-negative clinical isolates, including 108 K. pneumoniae, 10 E. coli, 2 E. cloacae, during the study period. Among the isolates, 66 (55%) were susceptible, and 54 (45%) were resistant to colistin, according to BMD. BD Phoenix, MicroScan, and E-test had 90.90%, 95.45%, and 96.96% sensitivity, respectively, when colistin was tested. Conclusion: In routine clinical practice, the worldwide reference method can hardly be implemented, and commercially available systems are used for the interpretation of colistin susceptibility. Colistin use is increasing for the treatment of multiresistant Gram-negative infections, further and more extensive studies are needed for precise susceptibility testing methods for this compound. We recommend that laboratories use the BMD method at least in selected patient groups in the face of increasing antimicrobial resistance.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 65
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of BD Phoenix and disk diffusion to broth microdilution for determining cefepime susceptibility among carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales
    Fouad, Aliaa
    Simner, Patricia J.
    Nicolau, David P.
    Asempa, Tomefa E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2024, 62 (06)
  • [2] Comparison of disk diffusion, MIC test strip and broth microdilution methods for cefiderocol susceptibility testing on carbapenem-resistant enterobacterales
    Bonnin, Remy A.
    Emeraud, Cecile
    Jousset, Agnes B.
    Naas, Thierry
    Dortet, Laurent
    [J]. CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2022, 28 (08) : 1156.e1 - 1156.e5
  • [3] Comparison of broth microdilution and E-test for susceptibility testing of Neisseria meningitidis
    Pascual, A
    Joyanes, P
    MartinezMartinez, L
    Suarez, AI
    Perea, EJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1996, 34 (03) : 588 - 591
  • [4] In-vitro Susceptibility Testing Methods for Ceftazidime-avibactam against Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales: Comparison with Reference Broth Microdilution Method
    Sharma, Bhawna
    Sreenivasan, Priya
    Angrup, Archana
    Kaur, Satinder
    Rana, Sudesh
    Kundu, Jyoti
    Biswal, Manisha
    Ray, Pallab
    [J]. CURRENT DRUG SAFETY, 2023, 18 (04) : 563 - 570
  • [5] Comparative Evaluation of Colistin-Susceptibility Testing in Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Using VITEK, Colistin Broth Disc Elution, and Colistin Broth Microdilution
    Antony, Tessa
    Senthilnathan, Yugadharshini
    Madhavakumar, Rukmani
    Amudhan, Premika
    Venkataraman, Shruthi
    Rally, Sanjana
    Pitani, Ravi S.
    Arumugam, Ilakkiya
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (07)
  • [6] Evaluation of the BD Phoenix automated system for determining antimicrobial susceptibility against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae compared with broth microdilution
    Haffler, Zachary J.
    Kulengowski, Brandon
    Ribes, Julie A.
    Burgess, David S.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2019, 54 (02) : 249 - 254
  • [7] Comparison of E-test and broth microdilution methods for antifungal drug susceptibility testing of molds
    Szekely, A
    Johnson, EM
    Warnock, DW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1999, 37 (05) : 1480 - 1483
  • [8] Comparison of the E-test to broth microdilution for susceptibility testing of gram-positive cocci
    DelaCalle, IJ
    Villavicencio, CY
    PerezRamos, S
    [J]. 10TH MEDITERRANEAN CONGRESS OF CHEMOTHERAPY, 1996, : 181 - 184
  • [9] COMPARISON OF E-TEST WITH BROTH MICRODILUTION AND DISK DIFFUSION FOR SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING OF CORYNEFORM BACTERIA
    MARTINEZMARTINEZ, L
    ORTEGA, MC
    SUAREZ, AI
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1995, 33 (05) : 1318 - 1321
  • [10] COMPARISON OF BROTH MACRODILUTION, BROTH MICRODILUTION, AND E-TEST ANTIFUNGAL SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTS FOR FLUCONAZOLE
    SEWELL, DL
    PFALLER, MA
    BARRY, AL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1994, 32 (09) : 2099 - 2102