Comparison of broth microdilution and E-test for susceptibility testing of Neisseria meningitidis

被引:17
|
作者
Pascual, A [1 ]
Joyanes, P [1 ]
MartinezMartinez, L [1 ]
Suarez, AI [1 ]
Perea, EJ [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV HOSP V MACARENA, SEVILLE, SPAIN
关键词
D O I
10.1128/JCM.34.3.588-591.1996
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The susceptibilities of 54 clinical isolates of Neisseria meningitidis to penicillin, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, cefepime, imipenem, ciprofloxacin, chloramphenicol, and rifampin were determined by the microdilution method in both cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth (CAMHB) and Haemophilus test medium (HTM). Poor growth was observed in 16.6 and 9% of the strains in CAMHB and HTM, respectively. As a result, the growth of the 54 N. meningitidis strains was evaluated in three other commercially available batches of CAMHB and in one in-house batch of HTM. Poor growth was observed for 9.3 to 16.6% of the strains in all four batches, More important, three of the CAMHB batches failed to support growth for 3.7 to 33.3% of the strains; 3.7% of the strains did not grow in the in-house-prepared HTM. Ten (18.7%) strains were relatively resistant to penicillin (RRP; MIC, >0.125 mu g/ml) in CAMHB and 13 (24%) strains were RRP in HTM. The percentages of agreement obtained by using CAMHB as the reference ranged from 78% for cefepime to 100% for ceftriaxone, Seven minor errors were observed for penicillin; five of them were for strains susceptible to penicillin in CAMHB and RRP in HTM. All strains were susceptible to the other antimicrobial agents evaluated. The growth of N. meningitidis was also evaluated in four batches of Mueller-Hinton agar (MHA). In two of them, 3.7 and 44.4% of the strains did not grow, and considering all four batches, 5,5 to 11.1% grew poorly. All strains grew adequately in MHA supplemented with blood (MHA-b). The activities of penicillin and cefotaxime were also evaluated by the E-test in MHA and MHA-b. The proportion of RRP strains were 24% in MHA and 59% in MHA-b. For penicillin, the percentages of agreement of the E-test with the microdilution method in CAMHB (reference) were 64.8 and 70.3% in MHA and MHA-b, respectively. For cefotaxime, the agreement was 98.1%. Minor errors for the penicillin MIC were detected for 38% of the strains tested. Further studies are needed to define adequate culture media for reference methods to evaluate the susceptibility of N, meningitidis to antimicrobial agents.
引用
收藏
页码:588 / 591
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of the E-test to broth microdilution for susceptibility testing of gram-positive cocci
    DelaCalle, IJ
    Villavicencio, CY
    PerezRamos, S
    [J]. 10TH MEDITERRANEAN CONGRESS OF CHEMOTHERAPY, 1996, : 181 - 184
  • [2] COMPARISON OF E-TEST WITH BROTH MICRODILUTION AND DISK DIFFUSION FOR SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING OF CORYNEFORM BACTERIA
    MARTINEZMARTINEZ, L
    ORTEGA, MC
    SUAREZ, AI
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1995, 33 (05) : 1318 - 1321
  • [3] Comparison of E-test and broth microdilution methods for antifungal drug susceptibility testing of molds
    Szekely, A
    Johnson, EM
    Warnock, DW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1999, 37 (05) : 1480 - 1483
  • [4] COMPARISON OF BROTH MACRODILUTION, BROTH MICRODILUTION, AND E-TEST ANTIFUNGAL SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTS FOR FLUCONAZOLE
    SEWELL, DL
    PFALLER, MA
    BARRY, AL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1994, 32 (09) : 2099 - 2102
  • [5] Posaconazole susceptibility testing against Candida species:: comparison of broth microdilution and E-test methods
    Soczo, G.
    Kardos, G.
    McNicholas, P. M.
    Falusi, E.
    Gergely, L.
    Majoros, L.
    [J]. MYCOSES, 2007, 50 (03) : 178 - 182
  • [6] Comparison of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing by Broth Microdilution and E-Test for Abiotrophia defectiva and Granulicatella spp
    Alberti, Michael O.
    Hindler, Janet A.
    Humphries, Romney M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2015, 143 : A35 - A35
  • [7] Comparison of broth macrodilution, broth microdilution and E-test susceptibility tests of Cryptococcus neoformans for fluconazole
    Chryssanthou, E
    Gronfors, C
    Khanna, N
    [J]. MYCOSES, 1997, 40 (11-12) : 423 - 427
  • [8] Comparison of the E test with broth microdilution for antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts
    Gould, IM
    Milne, K
    Wood, W
    Kunova, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMOTHERAPY, 1998, 10 (01) : 3 - 6
  • [9] E-TEST AS SUSCEPTIBILITY TEST FOR EVALUATION OF NEISSERIA-MENINGITIDIS ISOLATES
    PEREZTRALLERO, E
    GOMEZ, N
    GARCIAARENZANA, JM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1994, 32 (09) : 2341 - 2342
  • [10] Comparison between E-test and CLSI broth microdilution method for antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida albicans oral isolates
    Koga-Ito, Cristiane Yumi
    Lyon, Juliana Pereira
    de Resende, Maria Aparecida
    [J]. REVISTA DO INSTITUTO DE MEDICINA TROPICAL DE SAO PAULO, 2008, 50 (01): : 7 - 10