COMPARISON OF E-TEST WITH BROTH MICRODILUTION AND DISK DIFFUSION FOR SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING OF CORYNEFORM BACTERIA

被引:0
|
作者
MARTINEZMARTINEZ, L [1 ]
ORTEGA, MC [1 ]
SUAREZ, AI [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV HOSP VIRGEN MACARENA,DEPT MICROBIOL,E-41080 SEVILLE,SPAIN
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The susceptibilities of 135 coryneform bacteria isolated from clinical samples to ampicillin (AMP), cephalothin (CR), cefoxitin (FOX), cefotaxime (CTX), erythromycin (E), ciprofloxacin (CIP), tetracycline (TE), amikacin (AK), vancomycin (VA), and rifampin (R) were determined by disk diffusion, broth microdilution, and the E-test. The following species (number of isolates in parentheses) were included: Corynebacterium urealyticum (30), Corynebacterium minutissimum (20), coryneform CDC group ANF-1 (20), Corynebacterium striatum (20), Corynebacterium jeikeium (15), coryneform CDC group I2 (8), Listeria monocytogenes (7), Corynebacterium xerosis (5), and other coryneform bacteria (10). Agreement within one twofold dilution between the E-test and broth microdilution was 31% (VA), 64% (AK), 71% (CTX), 77% (FOX and CIP), 79% (TE), 84% (AMP), 87% (E), and 88% (CR and R). For the 1,350 combinations of microorganisms and antimicrobial agents, 85 (6.3%) discrepancies in interpretive category were found (4.2% minor, 1.2% major, and 0.9% very major). Seventy (5.1%) disagreements in interpretive category were found between disk diffusion and the E-test (3.8% minor, 0.4% major, and 0.9% very major), and 85 (6.3%) disagreements were found between microdilution (reference method) and disk diffusion (4.2% minor, 0.5% major, and 1.5% very major). MICs obtained with the E-test were highly reproducible, No category discrepancy was observed for VA, despite quantitative results. Considering interpretive categories, there is a good overall agreement between the three methods studied here, but further evaluation of current methodologies for susceptibility testing is required when considering coryneform bacteria and determination of quantitative activity of antimicrobial agents.
引用
收藏
页码:1318 / 1321
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of disk diffusion and broth microdilution methods for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Campylobacter isolates of meat origin
    Lazou, Thomai P.
    Chaintoutis, Serafeim C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGICAL METHODS, 2023, 204
  • [32] COMPARISON OF THE E-TEST (PDM EPSILOMETER) AND BROTH MICRODILUTION SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTS FOR MEMBERS OF THE BACTEROIDES-FRAGILIS GROUP
    MURRAY, PR
    NILES, AC
    [J]. DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 1991, 14 (06) : 501 - 505
  • [33] Comparison of-agar dilution, microdilution, E-test, and disk diffusion methods for testing activity of cefditoren against Streptococcus pneumoniae
    Kelly, LM
    Jacobs, MR
    Appelbaum, PC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1999, 37 (10) : 3296 - 3299
  • [34] Comparison of the Antifungal Susceptibility Testing Subcommittee of the European Committee on Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing proposed standard and the E-test with the NCCLS broth microdilution method for voriconazole and caspofungin susceptibility testing of yeast species
    Chryssanthou, E
    Cuenca-Estrella, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2002, 40 (10) : 3841 - 3844
  • [35] Comparison of agar dilution, broth dilution, disk diffusion, and the E-test for susceptibility testing of penicillin-susceptible and penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae
    Thorvilson, J
    Kohner, P
    Henry, N
    Cockerill, F
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1997, 16 (05) : 391 - 394
  • [36] Precision and accuracy of fluconazole susceptibility testing by broth microdilution, Etest, and disk diffusion methods
    Barry, AL
    Pfaller, MA
    Rennie, RP
    Fuchs, PC
    Brown, SD
    [J]. ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2002, 46 (06) : 1781 - 1784
  • [37] Comparative Evaluation of E-Test and Disk Diffusion Methods for Susceptibility Testing of Nocardia Species
    Percin, Duygu
    Sumerkan, Bulent
    Inci, Ramazan
    [J]. MIKROBIYOLOJI BULTENI, 2011, 45 (02): : 274 - 279
  • [38] Comparison of Broth Microdilution, Disk Diffusion and Strip Test Methods for Cefiderocol Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing on KPC-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae
    Bovo, Federica
    Lazzarotto, Tiziana
    Ambretti, Simone
    Gaibani, Paolo
    [J]. ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL, 2023, 12 (03):
  • [39] Comparison between broth microdilution and agar disk diffusion methods for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of bovine mastitis pathogens
    Palladini, Giorgia
    Garbarino, Chiara
    Luppi, Andrea
    Russo, Simone
    Filippi, Anita
    Arrigoni, Norma
    Massella, Elisa
    Ricchi, Matteo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGICAL METHODS, 2023, 212
  • [40] In Vitro Susceptibility Testing of Rifampin Against Acinetobacter Baumannii: Comparison of Disk Diffusion, Agar Dilution, and E-test
    Varshochi, Mojtaba
    Hasani, Alka
    Derakhshanfar, Seyed Jalaledin
    Bayatmakoo, Zhinous
    Ghavghani, Fatemeh Ravanbakhsh
    Poorshahverdi, Parinaz
    Nouri-Vaskeh, Masoud
    [J]. ERCIYES MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2019, 41 (04) : 364 - 368