COMPARISON OF E-TEST WITH BROTH MICRODILUTION AND DISK DIFFUSION FOR SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING OF CORYNEFORM BACTERIA

被引:0
|
作者
MARTINEZMARTINEZ, L [1 ]
ORTEGA, MC [1 ]
SUAREZ, AI [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV HOSP VIRGEN MACARENA,DEPT MICROBIOL,E-41080 SEVILLE,SPAIN
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The susceptibilities of 135 coryneform bacteria isolated from clinical samples to ampicillin (AMP), cephalothin (CR), cefoxitin (FOX), cefotaxime (CTX), erythromycin (E), ciprofloxacin (CIP), tetracycline (TE), amikacin (AK), vancomycin (VA), and rifampin (R) were determined by disk diffusion, broth microdilution, and the E-test. The following species (number of isolates in parentheses) were included: Corynebacterium urealyticum (30), Corynebacterium minutissimum (20), coryneform CDC group ANF-1 (20), Corynebacterium striatum (20), Corynebacterium jeikeium (15), coryneform CDC group I2 (8), Listeria monocytogenes (7), Corynebacterium xerosis (5), and other coryneform bacteria (10). Agreement within one twofold dilution between the E-test and broth microdilution was 31% (VA), 64% (AK), 71% (CTX), 77% (FOX and CIP), 79% (TE), 84% (AMP), 87% (E), and 88% (CR and R). For the 1,350 combinations of microorganisms and antimicrobial agents, 85 (6.3%) discrepancies in interpretive category were found (4.2% minor, 1.2% major, and 0.9% very major). Seventy (5.1%) disagreements in interpretive category were found between disk diffusion and the E-test (3.8% minor, 0.4% major, and 0.9% very major), and 85 (6.3%) disagreements were found between microdilution (reference method) and disk diffusion (4.2% minor, 0.5% major, and 1.5% very major). MICs obtained with the E-test were highly reproducible, No category discrepancy was observed for VA, despite quantitative results. Considering interpretive categories, there is a good overall agreement between the three methods studied here, but further evaluation of current methodologies for susceptibility testing is required when considering coryneform bacteria and determination of quantitative activity of antimicrobial agents.
引用
收藏
页码:1318 / 1321
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of disk diffusion, VITEK 2, and broth microdilution antimicrobial susceptibility test results for unusual species of Enterobactetiaceae
    Stone, Nimalie D.
    O'Hara, Caroline M.
    Williams, Portia P.
    McGowan, John E., Jr.
    Tenover, Fred C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2007, 45 (02) : 340 - 346
  • [42] Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing and Agreement Between Disk Diffusion and E-Test Methods
    Pathmanathan, S. G.
    Samat, N. A.
    Mohamed, R.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2008, 12 : E120 - E121
  • [43] Fluconazole and amphotericin B antifungal susceptibility testing by national committee for clinical laboratory standards broth macrodilution method compared with E-test and semiautomated broth microdilution test
    VanEldere, J
    Joosten, L
    Verhaeghe, A
    Surmont, I
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1996, 34 (04) : 842 - 847
  • [44] Fluconazole and amphotericin B antifungal susceptibility testing by national committee for clinical laboratory standards broth macrodilution method compared with E-test and semiautomated broth microdilution test
    RodriguezTudela, JL
    MartinezSuarez, JV
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1997, 35 (01) : 336 - 336
  • [45] Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Acinetobacter spp. by NCCLS broth microdilution and disk diffusion methods
    Swenson, JM
    Killgore, GE
    Tenover, FC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2004, 42 (11) : 5102 - 5108
  • [46] Results of an interlaboratory test on antimicrobial susceptibility testing of bacteria from animals by broth microdilution
    Wallmann, Juergen
    Boettner, Alexander
    Goossens, Luc
    Hafez, H. Mohamed
    Hartmann, Katrin
    Kaspar, Heike
    Kehrenberg, Corinna
    Kietzmann, Manfred
    Klarmann, Dieter
    Klein, Guenter
    Krabisch, Peter
    Kuehn, Tilman
    Luhofer, Gabriele
    Richter, Angelika
    Schulz, Bianka
    Schwarz, Stefan
    Sigge, Claudia
    Traeder, Wolfgang
    Waldmann, Karl-Heinz
    Werckenthin, Christiane
    Zschiesche, Eva
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2006, 27 (06) : 482 - 490
  • [47] EVALUATION OF THE E-TEST FOR SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING OF ANAEROBIC-BACTERIA
    CITRON, DM
    OSTOVARI, MI
    KARLSSON, A
    GOLDSTEIN, EJC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1991, 29 (10) : 2197 - 2203
  • [48] Comparison of broth microdilution, Etest, and agar disk diffusion methods for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Lactobacillus acidophilus group members
    Mayrhofer, Sigrid
    Domig, Konrad J.
    Mair, Christiane
    Zitz, Ulrike
    Huys, Geert
    Kneifel, Wolfgang
    [J]. APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2008, 74 (12) : 3745 - 3748
  • [49] Susceptibility testing of Malassezia furfur, Malassezia globosa and Malassezia sympodialis. Comparison of disk diffusion and broth microdilution methods
    Rojas, F.
    Zalazar, L. C.
    Fernandez, M. S.
    Sosa, M. A.
    Cattana, M. E.
    Alegre, L. R.
    Carillo Munoz, A. J.
    Giusiano, G. E.
    [J]. MYCOSES, 2015, 58 : 69 - 70
  • [50] Biocide susceptibility testing of bacteria: Development of a broth microdilution method
    Schug, Angela R.
    Bartel, Alexander
    Scholtzek, Anissa D.
    Meurer, Marita
    Brombach, Julian
    Hensel, Vivian
    Fanning, Seamus
    Schwarz, Stefan
    Fessler, Andrea T.
    [J]. VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY, 2020, 248