Comparative evaluation of image quality among different detector configurations using area detector computed tomography

被引:9
|
作者
Miura Y. [1 ,2 ]
Ichikawa K. [3 ]
Fujimura I. [2 ,4 ]
Hara T. [5 ]
Hoshino T. [6 ]
Niwa S. [2 ,5 ]
Funahashi M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Medical Technology, Osaka General Medical Center, Osaka
[2] Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa
[3] Institute of Medical, Pharmaceutical and Health Sciences, Kanazawa University, 5-11-80 Kodatsuno, Kanazawa, 920-0942, Ishikawa
[4] Department of Radiological Technology, Rinku General Medical Center, Izumisano
[5] Department of Medical Technology, Nakatsugawa Municipal General Hospital, Nakatsugawa
[6] Department of Radiology, Ishinkai Yao General Hospital, Yao
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
Computed tomography; Detector configurations; Helical scan; Image quality; System performance function; Volume CT dose index;
D O I
10.1007/s12194-017-0437-y
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The 320-detector row computed tomography (CT) system, i.e., the area detector CT (ADCT), can perform helical scanning with detector configurations of 4-, 16-, 32-, 64-, 80-, 100-, and 160-detector rows for routine CT examinations. This phantom study aimed to compare the quality of images obtained using helical scan mode with different detector configurations. The image quality was measured using modulation transfer function (MTF) and noise power spectrum (NPS). The system performance function (SP), based on the pre-whitening theorem, was calculated as MTF2/NPS, and compared between configurations. Five detector configurations, i.e., 0.5 × 16 mm (16 row), 0.5 × 64 mm (64 row), 0.5 × 80 mm (80 row), 0.5 × 100 mm (100 row), and 0.5 × 160 mm (160 row), were compared using a constant volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) of 25 mGy, simulating the scan of an adult abdomen, and with a constant effective mAs value. The MTF was measured using the wire method, and the NPS was measured from images of a 20-cm diameter phantom with uniform content. The SP of 80-row configuration was the best, for the constant CTDIvol, followed by the 64-, 160-, 16-, and 100-row configurations. The decrease in the rate of the 100- and 160-row configurations from the 80-row configuration was approximately 30%. For the constant effective mAs, the SPs of the 100-row and 160-row configurations were significantly lower, compared with the other three detector configurations. The 80- and 64-row configurations were adequate in cases that required dose efficiency rather than scan speed. © 2018, Japanese Society of Radiological Technology and Japan Society of Medical Physics.
引用
收藏
页码:54 / 60
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comprehensive preoperative evaluation of laparoscopic renal donors using 16-detector computed tomography
    Boyadzhyan, L
    Muangsomboon, K
    Raman, SS
    Pojchamarnwiputh, S
    Kim, H
    Schulam, PG
    Lu, DSK
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2005, 184 (04) : 101 - 101
  • [32] Assessment of image quality in photon-counting detector computed tomography of the wrist-An ex vivo study
    Kammerling, Nina
    Sandstedt, Marten
    Farnebo, Simon
    Persson, Anders
    Tesselaar, Erik
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 154
  • [33] Impact of Photon-Counting Detector Computed Tomography on Image Quality and Radiation Dose in Patients With Multiple Myeloma
    Rau, Alexander
    Neubauer, Jakob
    Taleb, Laetitia
    Stein, Thomas
    Schuermann, Till
    Rau, Stephan
    Faby, Sebastian
    Wenger, Sina
    Engelhardt, Monika
    Bamberg, Fabian
    Weiss, Jakob
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2023, 24 (10) : 1006 - 1016
  • [34] Single- vs multi-detector row computed tomography of the brain: Blinded assessment of image quality
    Jones, TR
    Kaplan, RT
    Lane, B
    Atlas, SW
    Rubin, GD
    RADIOLOGY, 2000, 217 : 514 - 514
  • [35] Screening for carotid injury in trauma patients: Image quality of 16-detector-row computed tomography angiography
    Borisch, I.
    Boehme, T.
    Butz, B.
    Hamer, O. W.
    Feuerbach, S.
    Zorger, N.
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2007, 48 (07) : 798 - 805
  • [36] X-ray tomography using a CMOS area detector
    Brunetti, A.
    Cesareo, R.
    NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION B-BEAM INTERACTIONS WITH MATERIALS AND ATOMS, 2007, 258 (02): : 485 - 489
  • [37] Image quality of computed radiography and flat panel detector radiography: Evaluation of simulated subtle lung abnormalities
    Tagashira, H
    Arakawa, K
    Yoshimoto, M
    Yasuhara, Y
    Ikezoe, J
    Ogura, T
    RADIOLOGY, 2001, 221 : 354 - 354
  • [38] An Affordable Image Detector and a Low-Cost Evaluation System for Computed Tomography Using Neutrons, X-rays, or Visible Light
    Schillinger, Burkhard
    QUANTUM BEAM SCIENCE, 2019, 3 (04)
  • [39] Using the Medipix2 detector for photon counting computed tomography
    Niederloehner, Daniel
    Nachtrab, Frank
    Michel, Thilo
    Anton, Gisela
    2005 IEEE NUCLEAR SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM CONFERENCE RECORD, VOLS 1-5, 2005, : 2327 - 2331
  • [40] Flat panel detector-based volumetric computed tomography (fpVCT) - Performance evaluation of volumetric methods by using different phantoms in comparison to 64-multislice computed tomography
    Obenauer, Silvia
    Dullin, Christian
    Heuser, Markus
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2007, 42 (05) : 291 - 296