Comparison of gated single-photon emission computed tomography with magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy

被引:0
|
作者
Petri Sipola
Keijo Peuhkurinen
Esko Vanninen
机构
[1] Kuopio University Hospital and University of Eastern Finland,Department of Clinical Radiology
[2] Kuopio University Hospital and University of Eastern Finland,Department of Medicine
[3] Kuopio University Hospital and University of Eastern Finland,Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine
关键词
Cardiac-gated single-photon emission computer-assisted tomography; Magnetic resonance imaging; Dilated cardiomyopathy; Left ventricular remodeling; Left ventricular function;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To prospectively compare the left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), end-systolic volume (LVESV), and ejection fraction (LVEF) obtained from gated perfusion single photon emission computed tomography (GSPECT) with those obtained from cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDC). Twenty-one patients with IDC (6 females) with a median age of 45 years (range 17–65) were scheduled for 99mTc-tetrofosmin-GSPECT and MRI within a 3 h interval. In both methods LV volumes were analyzed with the Simpson method. Both GSPECT and MRI were successfully completed in 90% of patients. Close linear correlations were observed between the two methods in LVEDV (R = 0.918; P < 0.001) and LVESV (R = 0.946; P < 0.001), but correlations were significantly weaker in LVEF (R = 0.323; P = 0.082). LVEDV and LVESV were smaller in GSPECT than in MRI (161 ± 73 vs. 214 ± 87 ml, P < 0.001, and 116 ± 64 vs. 138 ± 72 ml, P < 0.001, respectively). In 4 patients (21%) the LVEDV index was considered normal by GSPECT and increased by MRI, if MRI-derived normal values were used. No difference was found between GSPECT and MRI when LVEFMRI was ≤40%, but GSPECT showed smaller LVEF when LVEFMRI was over 40% (33 ± 11 vs. 50 ± 5%; P < 0.05). The finding of increased LVEDV in GSPECT is reliable compared with MRI. However, LV volumes were underestimated by GSPECT and no direct comparisons can be made between methods in follow up studies. Abnormal results should be confirmed by another imaging modality, such as MRI, if these findings have therapeutic consequences.
引用
收藏
页码:629 / 634
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of two-dimensional echocardiographic tissue harmonic imaging and gated sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomographic left ventricular ejection fraction measurements
    Belkin, RN
    Ghosh, J
    Deluca, AJ
    Alas, LA
    Murphy, JJ
    McClung, JA
    Visintainer, P
    Sarabu, BR
    Aronow, WS
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2003, 92 (06): : 759 - 762
  • [22] Automated image registration of gated cardiac single-photon emission computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging
    Aladl, UE
    Hurwitz, GA
    Dey, D
    Levin, D
    Drangova, M
    Slomka, PJ
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2004, 19 (03) : 283 - 290
  • [23] Comparison of left ventricular ejection fraction values obtained using invasive contrast left ventriculography, two-dimensional echocardiography, and gated single-photon emission computed tomography
    Garg, Nadish
    Dresser, Thomas
    Aggarwal, Kul
    Gupta, Vishal
    Mittal, Mayank K.
    Alpert, Martin A.
    SAGE OPEN MEDICINE, 2016, 4
  • [24] Comparison of automated gated myocardial SPECT with cardiac magnetic resonance for evaluation of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction
    Persson, E
    Carlsson, M
    Palmer, J
    Pahlm, O
    Arheden, H
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2004, 31 : S312 - S312
  • [25] Comparison of two software in gated myocardial perfusion single photon emission tomography, for the measurement of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction, in patients with and without perfusion defects
    Kakhki, Vahid Reza Dabbagh
    Zakavi, Seyed Rasoul
    Sadeghi, Ramin
    HELLENIC JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2007, 10 (01): : 19 - 23
  • [26] Evaluation of ventricular ejection fraction, wall motion, wall thickening, and other parameters with gated myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography
    Berman, DS
    Germano, G
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY, 1997, 4 (02) : S169 - S171
  • [27] Comparison of echocardiography with technetium 99m-gated single photon emission computed tomography as diagnostic tools for left ventricular ejection fraction
    Choragudi, NL
    Prakash, AM
    Sun, Y
    Prasad, P
    Chiaramida, SA
    Lucariello, RJ
    ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY-A JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ULTRASOUND AND ALLIED TECHNIQUES, 2001, 18 (08): : 627 - 632
  • [28] Specific Manifestation of Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography and Positron Emission Tomography Magnetic Resonance Imaging in a Man With Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy
    Yao, Zhifeng
    Hu, Jialu
    Yan, Yan
    Ge, Junbo
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2019, 12 (10)
  • [29] Real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography and left ventricular volumes in ischaemic cardiomyopathy: a comparison to single photon emission computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
    Chan, J.
    Jenkins, C.
    Khafagi, F.
    Du, L.
    Marwick, T. H.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2005, 26 : 438 - 439
  • [30] Evaluation of Left and Right Ventricular Ejection Fraction and Volumes from Gated Blood-Pool SPECT in Patients with Dilated Cardiomyopathy: Comparison with Cardiac MRI
    Xie, Bo-Qia
    Tian, Yue-Qin
    Zhang, Jian
    Zhao, Shi-Hua
    Yang, Min-Fu
    Guo, Feng
    Wang, Dao-Yu
    Wei, Hong-Xing
    Chu, Ke-Wei
    He, Zuo-Xiang
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2012, 53 (04) : 584 - 591