Life Cycle Assessment Analysis and Comparison of 1000 MW S-CO2 Coal Fired Power Plant and 1000 MW USC Water-Steam Coal-Fired Power Plant

被引:0
|
作者
Mingjia Li
Ge Wang
Jinliang Xu
Jingwei Ni
Enhui Sun
机构
[1] Xi’an Jiaotong University,Key Laboratory of Thermo
[2] North China Electric Power University,Fluid Science and Engineering of Ministry of Education, School of Energy & Power Engineering
来源
关键词
S-CO; power plant; ultra-supercritical water-steam Rankine cycle power plant; life cycle assessment; energy efficiency; environment impact; economic performance;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The objective of this paper is to understand the benefits that one can achieve for large-scale supercritical CO2 (S-CO2) coal-fired power plants. The aspects of energy environment and economy of 1000 MW S-CO2 coal-fired power generation system and 1000 MW ultra-supercritical (USC) water-steam Rankine cycle coal-fired power generation system are analyzed and compared at the similar main vapor parameters, by adopting the neural network genetic algorithm and life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology. Multi-objective optimization of the 1000 MW S-CO2 coal-fired power generation system is further carried out. The power generation efficiency, environmental impact load, and investment recovery period are adopted as the objective functions. The main vapor parameters of temperature and pressure are set as the decision variables. The results are concluded as follows. First, the total energy consumption of the S-CO2 coal-fired power generation system is 10.48 MJ/kWh and the energy payback ratio is 34.37%. The performance is superior to the USC coal-fired power generation system. Second, the resource depletion index of the S-CO2 coal-fired power generation system is 4.38 µPRchina,90, which is lower than that of the USC coal-fired power generation system, and the resource consumption is less. Third, the environmental impact load of the S-CO2 coal-fired power generation system is 0.742 mPEchina,90, which is less than that of the USC coal-fired power generation system, 0.783 mPEchina,90. Among all environmental impact types, human toxicity potential HTP and global warming potential GWP account for the most environmental impact. Finally, the investment cost of the S-CO2 coal-fired power generation system is generally less than that of the USC coal-fired power generation system because the cost of the S-CO2 turbine is only half of the cost of the steam turbine. The optimal turbine inlet temperature T5 becomes smaller, and the optimal turbine inlet pressure is unchanged at 622.082°C/30 MPa.
引用
收藏
页码:463 / 484
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The energy-saving mechanism of coal-fired power plant with S-CO2 cycle compared to steam-Rankine cycle
    Chen, Zhewen
    Wang, Yanjuan
    Zhang, Xiaosong
    Xu, Jinliang
    [J]. ENERGY, 2020, 195
  • [22] Analysis of a coal-fired power system integrated with a reheat S-CO2 cycle
    Sun, Enhui
    Xu, Jinliang
    Hu, Han
    Zhu, Bingguo
    Xie, Jian
    Zheng, Yawen
    [J]. INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS FOR ENERGY TRANSITIONS, 2019, 158 : 1461 - 1466
  • [23] Exergy analysis of a 1000 MW single reheat advanced supercritical carbon dioxide coal-fired partial flow power plant
    Zhou, Jing
    Ling, Peng
    Su, Sheng
    Xu, Jun
    Xu, Kai
    Wang, Yi
    Hu, Song
    Zhu, Meng
    Xiang, Jun
    [J]. FUEL, 2019, 255
  • [24] Thermodynamics analysis of S-CO2 recompression-reheating cycle for coal fired power plant
    Sun, Enhui
    Zheng, Yawen
    Wang, Ge
    Xu, Jinliang
    [J]. CHINESE SCIENCE BULLETIN-CHINESE, 2019, 64 (02): : 234 - 244
  • [25] Energy and exergy analyses of S-CO2 coal-fired power plant with reheating processes
    Chen, Zhewen
    Wang, Yanjuan
    Zhang, Xiaosong
    [J]. ENERGY, 2020, 211
  • [26] 800-MW Supercritical Coal-Fired Boilers in Suizhong Power Plant
    By Zou Haifeng
    [J]. Electricity, 2005, (02) : 30 - 33
  • [27] Energy consumption and energy-saving potential analysis of pollutant abatement systems in a 1000-MW coal-fired power plant
    Yang, Hang
    Zhang, Yongxin
    Zheng, Chenghang
    Wu, Xuecheng
    Chen, Linghong
    Gao, Xiang
    Fu, Joshua S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 2018, 68 (09) : 920 - 930
  • [28] Heat Distribution and Boiler Efficiency of 600MW Coal-fired CFB Boiler With S-CO2 Power Cycle
    Li, Pingjiao
    Zhong, Wenqi
    Chen, Xiaole
    Liu, Xuejiao
    [J]. Zhongguo Dianji Gongcheng Xuebao/Proceedings of the Chinese Society of Electrical Engineering, 2019, 39 (07): : 2080 - 2092
  • [29] Comparison and Analysis of CO2 Capture Technology of Coal-fired Power Plant
    Wang, Chao
    Chen, ShenQian
    Ren, JianXing
    [J]. 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MECHANICS, DYNAMIC SYSTEMS AND MATERIAL ENGINEERING (MDSME 2015), 2015, : 113 - 116
  • [30] System Integration and Flowsheet Optimization of 1000 MW Coal-fired Supercritical Power Generation Units
    Huang, Shengwei
    Xu, Gang
    Yang, Yongping
    Zhang, Chenxu
    Wang, Ligang
    Wang, Ningling
    Yang, Zhiping
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED ENERGY, ICAE2014, 2014, 61 : 1816 - 1819