Life Cycle Assessment Analysis and Comparison of 1000 MW S-CO2 Coal Fired Power Plant and 1000 MW USC Water-Steam Coal-Fired Power Plant

被引:0
|
作者
Mingjia Li
Ge Wang
Jinliang Xu
Jingwei Ni
Enhui Sun
机构
[1] Xi’an Jiaotong University,Key Laboratory of Thermo
[2] North China Electric Power University,Fluid Science and Engineering of Ministry of Education, School of Energy & Power Engineering
来源
关键词
S-CO; power plant; ultra-supercritical water-steam Rankine cycle power plant; life cycle assessment; energy efficiency; environment impact; economic performance;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The objective of this paper is to understand the benefits that one can achieve for large-scale supercritical CO2 (S-CO2) coal-fired power plants. The aspects of energy environment and economy of 1000 MW S-CO2 coal-fired power generation system and 1000 MW ultra-supercritical (USC) water-steam Rankine cycle coal-fired power generation system are analyzed and compared at the similar main vapor parameters, by adopting the neural network genetic algorithm and life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology. Multi-objective optimization of the 1000 MW S-CO2 coal-fired power generation system is further carried out. The power generation efficiency, environmental impact load, and investment recovery period are adopted as the objective functions. The main vapor parameters of temperature and pressure are set as the decision variables. The results are concluded as follows. First, the total energy consumption of the S-CO2 coal-fired power generation system is 10.48 MJ/kWh and the energy payback ratio is 34.37%. The performance is superior to the USC coal-fired power generation system. Second, the resource depletion index of the S-CO2 coal-fired power generation system is 4.38 µPRchina,90, which is lower than that of the USC coal-fired power generation system, and the resource consumption is less. Third, the environmental impact load of the S-CO2 coal-fired power generation system is 0.742 mPEchina,90, which is less than that of the USC coal-fired power generation system, 0.783 mPEchina,90. Among all environmental impact types, human toxicity potential HTP and global warming potential GWP account for the most environmental impact. Finally, the investment cost of the S-CO2 coal-fired power generation system is generally less than that of the USC coal-fired power generation system because the cost of the S-CO2 turbine is only half of the cost of the steam turbine. The optimal turbine inlet temperature T5 becomes smaller, and the optimal turbine inlet pressure is unchanged at 622.082°C/30 MPa.
引用
收藏
页码:463 / 484
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Exergy and exergo-environmental analysis of a 660 MW supercritical coal-fired power plant
    Keval Chandrakant Nikam
    Ravinder Kumar
    Ravindra Jilte
    [J]. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 2021, 145 : 1005 - 1018
  • [42] Exergy and exergo-environmental analysis of a 660 MW supercritical coal-fired power plant
    Nikam, Keval Chandrakant
    Kumar, Ravinder
    Jilte, Ravindra
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THERMAL ANALYSIS AND CALORIMETRY, 2021, 145 (03) : 1005 - 1018
  • [43] Thermodynamic Modeling and Validation of a 210-MW Capacity Coal-Fired Power Plant
    Kumar, Ravinder
    [J]. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 40 (03) : 233 - 242
  • [44] Thermodynamic Modeling and Validation of a 210-MW Capacity Coal-Fired Power Plant
    Ravinder Kumar
    [J]. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Mechanical Engineering, 2016, 40 : 233 - 242
  • [45] Pricing tomorrow's coal-fired power plant
    Cooney, Catherine M.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 41 (10) : 3396 - 3397
  • [46] Life-cycle assessment of flue gas CO2 fixation from coal-fired power plant and coal chemical plant by microalgae
    Ye, Qing
    Shen, Yu
    Zhang, Qi
    Wu, Xi
    Guo, Wangbiao
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 848
  • [47] Energy, exergy and economic (3E) evaluation and conceptual design of the 1000 MW coal-fired power plants integrated with S-CO2 Brayton cycles
    Guo, Jia-Qi
    Li, Ming-Jia
    Xu, Jin-Liang
    Yan, Jun-Jie
    Ma, Teng
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 211
  • [48] A streamlined life cycle assessment of a coal-fired power plant: the South African case study
    Dunmade, Israel
    Madushele, Nkosinathi
    Adedeji, Paul A.
    Akinlabi, Esther T.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2019, 26 (18) : 18484 - 18492
  • [49] A streamlined life cycle assessment of a coal-fired power plant: the South African case study
    Israel Dunmade
    Nkosinathi Madushele
    Paul A. Adedeji
    Esther T. Akinlabi
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2019, 26 : 18484 - 18492
  • [50] Energetic and exergetic analysis of a multi-stage turbine, coal-fired 173 MW power plant
    Clay, Joshua
    Mathias, James
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EXERGY, 2018, 27 (04) : 419 - 436