Evaluation criteria for film based intensity modulated radiation therapy quality assurance

被引:7
|
作者
Anjum, Muhammad Naeem [1 ,2 ]
Parker, William [2 ]
Ruo, Russell [2 ]
Afzal, Muhammad [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Islamia Univ Bahawalpur, Dept Phys, Bahawalpur, Pakistan
[2] McGill Univ, Ctr Hlth, Montreal Gen Hosp, Dept Med Phys, Montreal, PQ H3C 1A4, Canada
[3] Univ Dundee, Ninewells Hosp & Med Sch, Dept Med Phys, Dundee DD1 9SY, Scotland
来源
关键词
IMRT; Gafchromic (TM) EBT; gamma-Histograms; Film dosimetry; EBT FILM; RADIOTHERAPY; DOSIMETRY; CARCINOMA; CANCER; IMRT; IMPLEMENTATION; VERIFICATION; SENSITIVITY; DELIVERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejmp.2009.06.002
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to use different gamma histogram criteria for the comparison of planned dose with irradiated dose distribution and find that what percent of pixels passing a certain criteria imitate a good quality plan. The dose was calculated for 156 patients by inverse planning optimization using the Corvus treatment planning system. Gaf-3 chromic films in combination with 2571 0.6 cm(3) Farmer type ionization chamber and Farmer 2570/1 electrometer from NE Technology were used to measure the delivered dose in solid water phantom. All the measurements were performed on Varian CL21EX linear accelerator (Varian Medical. Systems, Palo Alto, CA) fitted with a Millennium 120 leaf collimator. In this study the mean value of the percent of passing pixels within the region of interest under the criterion of 3% DD and 3 mm DTA is 90.2 +/- 7.1% for head and neck cases and 92.2 +/- 5.8% for non-head and neck cases. If we choose the criteria of 3% DD and 3 mm DTA then 96.3% head and neck plans have the percent of passing pixels >= 75% and 95.1% non-head and neck plans have the percent of passing pixels >= 80%. It is evident from the results of this study that the criterion of 5% DD and 3 mm DTA with the percent of passing pixels >= 90 for non-head and neck cases while the percent of passing pixels >= 85 for head and neck cases endorse that a plan is good. The results of this study may be useful for other institutions which use verification software and EBT films for patient specific IMRT QA. (C) 2009 Associazione Itatiana di Fisica Medica. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All. rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:38 / 43
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of action levels for patient-specific quality assurance of intensity modulated radiation therapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy treatments
    Mancuso, Gordon M.
    Fontenot, Jonas D.
    Gibbons, John P.
    Parker, Brent C.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (07) : 4378 - 4385
  • [42] Patient Specification Quality Assurance for Glioblastoma Multiforme Brain Tumors Treated with Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy
    Al-Mohammed, H. I.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2011, 8 (06): : 461 - 466
  • [43] Quality Assurance of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy: Site-Specific Results of Eulji University Hospital
    Kim, Sung Jin
    Lee, Mi Jo
    Youn, Seon Min
    [J]. RADIATION ONCOLOGY JOURNAL, 2011, 29 (02): : 99 - 106
  • [44] Outcomes of Routine Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Quality Assurance in a Large Head and Neck Cancer Center
    Amarasena, Isuru
    Herschtal, Alan
    D'Costa, Ieta
    Fua, Tsien
    Tiong, Albert
    Geddes, Vaughan
    Tran, Phillip
    Liu, Chen
    Corry, June
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2017, 98 (03): : 541 - 546
  • [45] Evaluation of gafchromic EBT film for intensity modulated radiation therapy dose distribution verification
    Sankar, A.
    Kurup, P. G. Goplakrishna
    Murali, V.
    Ayyangar, Komanduri M.
    Nehru, R. Mothilal
    Velmurugan, J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 31 (02) : 78 - 82
  • [46] Radiobiological model-based bio-anatomical quality assurance in intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer
    Park, Ji-Yeon
    Lee, Jeong-Woo
    Chung, Jin-Beom
    Choi, Kyoung-Sik
    Kim, Yon-Lae
    Park, Byung-Moon
    Kim, Youhyun
    Kim, Jungmin
    Choi, Jonghak
    Kim, Jae-Sung
    Hong, Semie
    Suh, Tae-Suk
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2012, 53 (06) : 978 - 988
  • [47] A Portal Imaging System for Intensity Modulated Neutron Therapy Quality Assurance
    Lehnert, A.
    Kranz, M.
    DeWitt, D.
    Hunter, W.
    Emery, R.
    Argento, D.
    Stewart, R.
    Miyaoka, R.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (06) : E511 - E511
  • [48] Commissioning and quality assurance of a simplified version of Intensity Modulated Arc Therapy
    Wong, E
    Chen, JZ
    Gete, E
    Bernas, L
    Kavoun, X
    Kron, T
    Bauman, G
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2002, 29 (06) : 1365 - 1365
  • [49] An FMEA evaluation of intensity modulated radiation therapy dose delivery failures at tolerance criteria levels
    Faught, Jacqueline Tonigan
    Balter, Peter A.
    Johnson, Jennifer L.
    Kry, Stephen F.
    Court, Laurence E.
    Stingo, Francesco C.
    Followill, David S.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (11) : 5575 - 5583
  • [50] Absolute film dosimetry for verification in intensity modulated radiation therapy
    Mercay, A
    Moeckli, R
    Pache, G
    Bulling, S
    Do, HP
    Bressan, S
    Valley, JF
    [J]. STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2004, 180 : 108 - 108