NEMA NU-4 2008 performance evaluation of Xtrim-PET: A prototype SiPM-based preclinical scanner

被引:24
|
作者
Amirrashedi, Mahsa [1 ,2 ]
Sarkar, Saeed [1 ,2 ]
Ghafarian, Pardis [3 ,4 ]
Shahraki, Reza Hashemi [1 ,2 ]
Geramifar, Parham [5 ]
Zaidi, Habib [6 ,7 ,8 ,9 ]
Ay, Mohammad Reza [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Dept Med Phys & Biomed Engn, Tehran, Iran
[2] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Res Ctr Mol & Cellular Imaging, Tehran, Iran
[3] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Chron Resp Dis Res Ctr, NRITLD, Tehran, Iran
[4] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Masih Daneshvari Hosp, PET CT & Cyclotron Ctr, Tehran, Iran
[5] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Shariati Hosp, Res Ctr Nucl Med, Tehran, Iran
[6] Geneva Univ Hosp, Div Nucl Med & Mol Imaging, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland
[7] Univ Geneva, Neuroctr, CH-1205 Geneva, Switzerland
[8] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Nucl Med & Mol Imaging, NL-9700 RB Groningen, Netherlands
[9] Univ Southern Denmark, Dept Nucl Med, DK-500 Odense, Denmark
关键词
detectors; NEMA standard; performance evaluation; PET; small animal imaging; PET/MRI; INSERT; ALGORITHMS; SYSTEM; MRI;
D O I
10.1002/mp.13785
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose Xtrim-PET is a newly designed Silicon Photomultipliers (SiPMs)-based prototype PET scanner dedicated for small laboratory animal imaging. We present the performance evaluation of the Xtrim-PET scanner following NEMA NU-4 2008 standards to help optimizing scanning protocols which can be achieved through standard and reliable system performance characterization. Methods The performance assessment was conducted according to the National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) NU-4 2008 standards in terms of spatial resolution, sensitivity, counting rate performance, scatter fraction and image quality. The in vivo imaging capability of the scanner is also showcased through scanning a normal mouse injected with F-18-FDG. Furthermore, the performance characteristics of the developed scanner are compared with commercially available systems and current prototypes. Results The volumetric spatial resolution at 5 mm radial offset from the central axis of the scanner is 6.81 mu l, whereas a peak absolute sensitivity of 2.99% was achieved using a 250-650 keV energy window and a 10 ns timing window. The peak noise-equivalent count rate (NECR) using a mouse-like phantom is 113.18 kcps at 0.34 KBq/cc with 12.5% scatter fraction, whereas the NECR peaked at 82.76 kcps for an activity concentration level of 0.048 KBq/cc with a scatter fraction of 25.8% for rat-like phantom. An excellent uniformity (3.8%) was obtained using NEMA image quality phantom. Recovery coefficients of 90%, 86%, 68%, 40% and 12% were calculated for rod diameters of 5, 4, 3, 2 and 1 mm, respectively. Spill-over ratios for air-filled and water-filled chambers were 35% and 25% without applying any correction for attenuation and Compton scattering effects. Conclusion Our findings revealed that beyond compactness, lightweight, easy installation and good energy resolution, the Xtrim-PET prototype presents a reasonable performance making it suitable for preclinical molecular imaging-based research.
引用
收藏
页码:4816 / 4825
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Technical Note: Performance evaluation of a small-animal PET/CT system based on NEMA NU 4-2008 standards
    Liu, Qiong
    Li, Chaofan
    Liu, Jiguo
    Krish, Kishore
    Fu, Xinlei
    Zhao, Jie
    Chen, Jyh-Cheng
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (09) : 5272 - 5282
  • [32] Performance characteristics of a new development dedicated breast PET scanner evaluated with the NEMA NU 2-2008 standard
    Inoue, Mika
    Nakamoto, Yuji
    Matsumoto, Keiichi
    Kawase, Shigeto
    Yamakawa, Yoshiyuki
    Ohi, Junichi
    Kitamura, Keishi
    Togashi, Kaori
    Higashimura, Kyoji
    Onoguchi, Masahisa
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2011, 52
  • [33] Comparison of NEMA NU 4-2008 vs NEMA NU 2-2001 for the performance evaluation of the microPET R4 system
    Popota, F. D.
    Aguiar, P.
    Fernandez, Y.
    Lois, C.
    Pareto, D.
    Ros, D.
    Pavia, J.
    Gispert, J. D.
    2009 IEEE NUCLEAR SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM CONFERENCE RECORD, VOLS 1-5, 2009, : 2706 - +
  • [34] NEMA NU4 performance evaluation of the SynchroPET human arterial PET (ArterialPET) scanner for standalone blood input function derivation
    Karakatsanis, Nicolas
    Fung, Edward
    Akerele, Mercy
    Pollenz, Louis
    Gross, Robert
    Sinelnikov, Yegor
    Mariner, Tom
    Alessi, Marc
    Babich, John
    Nehmeh, Sadek
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2020, 61
  • [35] First Test Results of a Commercially Available Clinical PET Scanner Using the NEMA NU 4-2008 Small Animal PET Standards
    Luo, Weidong
    Anashkin, Edward
    Matthews, Chris G.
    2008 IEEE NUCLEAR SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM AND MEDICAL IMAGING CONFERENCE (2008 NSS/MIC), VOLS 1-9, 2009, : 3991 - 3996
  • [36] NEMA NU-04-based Performance Characteristics of the LabPET-8™ Small Animal PET Scanner
    Prasad, Rameshwar
    Ratib, Osman
    Zaidi, Habib
    2011 IEEE NUCLEAR SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM AND MEDICAL IMAGING CONFERENCE (NSS/MIC), 2011, : 3654 - 3660
  • [37] NEMA NU-04-based performance characteristics of the LabPET-8™ small animal PET scanner
    Prasad, Rameshwar
    Ratib, Osman
    Zaidi, Habib
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2011, 56 (20): : 6649 - 6664
  • [38] Performance evaluation of siemens CTI ECAT EXACT 47 PET scanner using NEMA NU2-2001
    Kim, JS
    Lee, JS
    Lee, DS
    Jung, JK
    Lee, MC
    2004 IEEE NUCLEAR SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM CONFERENCE RECORD, VOLS 1-7, 2004, : 3118 - 3120
  • [39] NEMA NU2-like performance evaluation of a helmet-type brain TOF-PET prototype
    Akamatsu, Go
    Yoshida, Eiji
    Tashima, Hideaki
    Iwao, Yuma
    Takahashi, Miwako
    Yamashita, Taichi
    Yamaya, Taiga
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2019, 60
  • [40] From a PMT-based to a SiPM-based PET system: a study to define matched acquisition/reconstruction parameters and NEMA performance of the Biograph Vision 450
    Carlier, Thomas
    Ferrer, Ludovic
    Conti, Maurizio
    Bodet-Milin, Caroline
    Rousseau, Caroline
    Bercier, Yanic
    Bendriem, Bernard
    Kraeber-Bodere, Francoise
    EJNMMI PHYSICS, 2020, 7 (01)