Dose efficiency and low-contrast detectability of an amorphous silicon x-ray detector for digital radiography

被引:29
|
作者
Aufrichtig, R
Xue, P
机构
[1] Perkin Elmer, GE Med Syst, Xray Detector Engn, Santa Clara, CA 95054 USA
[2] GE Med Syst, Xray Syst Engn, Milwaukee, WI USA
来源
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY | 2000年 / 45卷 / 09期
关键词
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/45/9/316
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The effect of dose reduction on low-contrast detectability is investigated theoretically and experimentally for a production grade amorphous silicon (a-Si) x-ray detector and compared with a standard thoracic screen-film combination. A non-prewhitening matched filter observer model modified to include a spatial response function and internal noise for the human visual system (HVS) is used to calculate a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) related to object detectability. Other inputs to the SNR calculation are the detective quantum efficiency (DQE) and the modulation transfer function (MTF) of the imaging system. Besides threshold detectability, the model predicts the equivalent perception dose ratio (EPDR), which is the fraction of the screen-him exposure for which the digital detector provides equal detectability. Images of a contrast-detail phantom are obtained with the digital detector at dose levels corresponding to 27%, 41%, 63% and 100% of the dose used for screen-film. The images are used in a four-alternative forced choice (4-AFC) observer perception study in order to measure threshold detectability. A statistically significant improvement in contrast detectability is measured with the digital detector at 100% and 63% of the screen-film dose. There is no statistical difference between screen-film and digital at 41% of the dose. On average, the experimental EPDR is 44%, which agrees well with the model prediction of 40%.
引用
收藏
页码:2653 / 2669
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Low-contrast X-ray enhancement using a fuzzy gamma reasoning model
    Mouzai, Meriem
    Tarabet, Chahrazed
    Mustapha, Aouache
    MEDICAL & BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING & COMPUTING, 2020, 58 (06) : 1177 - 1197
  • [32] X-ray detectors: Amorphous silicon offers digital promise
    Graeve, T
    PHOTONICS SPECTRA, 1998, 32 (01) : 115 - 116
  • [33] Investigation of optimum anti-scatter grid selection for digital radiography: Physical imaging properties and detectability of low-contrast signals
    Tanaka N.
    Naka K.
    Saito A.
    Morishita J.
    Toyofuku F.
    Ohki M.
    Higashida Y.
    Radiological Physics and Technology, 2013, 6 (1) : 54 - 60
  • [34] Low-contrast X-ray enhancement using a fuzzy gamma reasoning model
    Meriem Mouzai
    Chahrazed Tarabet
    Aouache Mustapha
    Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 2020, 58 : 1177 - 1197
  • [35] When will Low-Contrast Features be Visible in a STEM X-Ray Spectrum Image?
    Parish, Chad M.
    MICROSCOPY AND MICROANALYSIS, 2015, 21 (03) : 706 - 724
  • [36] Hydrogenated amorphous silicon-germanium pin x-ray detector
    Liu, SD
    Lee, SC
    Chern, MY
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRON DEVICES, 2001, 48 (08) : 1564 - 1567
  • [37] Digital chest radiography with a large-area flat-panel silicon X-ray detector: clinical comparison with conventional radiography
    Svenja P. Hennigs
    Marietta Garmer
    Horst J. Jaeger
    Reinhard Classen
    Andreas Jacobs
    Hans M. Gissler
    Andreas Christmann
    Klaus Mathias
    European Radiology, 2001, 11 : 1688 - 1696
  • [38] High resolution flat-panel X-ray detector for digital radiography
    Park, JK
    Kang, SS
    Cha, BY
    Kim, JY
    Kim, SY
    Choi, HK
    Nam, SH
    Healthcom 2005: 7th International Workshop on Enterprise Networking and Computing in Healthcare Industry, Proceedings, 2005, : 359 - 363
  • [39] X-ray detectors for digital radiography
    Yaffe, MJ
    Rowlands, JA
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1997, 42 (01): : 1 - 39
  • [40] Design of longitudinal auto-tracking of the detector on X-ray in digital radiography
    Yu, Xiaomin
    Jiang, Tianhao
    Liu, Zhihong
    Zhao, Xu
    Shengwu Yixue Gongchengxue Zazhi/Journal of Biomedical Engineering, 2018, 35 (02): : 297 - 300