Attachment Systems for Mandibular Single-Implant Overdentures: An In Vitro Retention Force Investigation on Different Designs

被引:0
|
作者
Alsabeeha, Nabeel [1 ]
Atieh, Momen [1 ]
Swain, Michael V. [1 ]
Payne, Alan G. T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Otago, Sch Dent, Sir John Walsh Res Inst, Oral Implantol Res Grp, Dunedin, New Zealand
关键词
PROSPECTIVE CLINICAL-EVALUATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; COMPLETE DENTURES; INTERIMPLANT DISTANCE; EDENTULOUS PATIENT; BAR-CLIP; STABILITY; TRIAL; BALL; PREFERENCE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the retentive force of six different attachment systems used for mandibular single-implant overdentures, including two prototype large ball attachment designs. Materials and Methods: Two prototype ball attachments of larger dimensions (7.9 and 5.9 mm) and four commercially available ball and stud attachments of standard dimensions (2.25 and 4.0 mm) were evaluated on three identical test casts resembling an edentulous mandible with severe residual ridge resorption. Five samples from each attachment system (n = 30) were connected to three different implants (8.0-mm wide diameter, 3.75-mm regular diameter, and 4.0-mm regular diameter). An Instron testing machine with a computer software package was used to deliver a vertical dislodging force at a cross-head speed of 50 mm/min to each overdenture sample from the anterior direction. A total of 300 pull tests were conducted (50 per attachment system). The maximum load (retentive force) required to separate each overdenture from the supporting implant was then measured. Results: The highest retentive force (36.97 +/- 2.23 N) was achieved with the 7.9-mm prototype ball attachment design, followed in a decreasing order by the 5.9-mm prototype ball attachment design (32.06 +/- 2.59 N), the standard 2.25-mm ball attachment (17.32 +/- 3.68 N), Locator white (12.39 +/- 0.55 N), Locator pink (9.40 N +/- 0.74 N), and Locator blue (3.83 +/- 0.64 N). A statistically significant difference (P < .0001) was found between all attachments. Conclusions: Attachment systems of larger dimensions provided higher retentive forces for mandibular single-implant overdentures. Further in vitro and in vivo research is necessary to determine prosthodontic outcomes with these attachments in edentulous patients prior to their routine clinical use internationally. Int J Prosthodont 2010;23:160-166.
引用
收藏
页码:160 / 166
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Using an Attachment System with PEEK Matrices for Single-Implant Overdentures: In Vitro Retention Force
    Fugariu, Ioana
    de Souza, Raphael Freitas
    Rosas, Eduardo
    Borie, Eduardo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (06)
  • [2] Retention of mandibular implant-retained overdentures with two different attachment designs: An in vitro study
    Ramadan, Rania E.
    Mohamed, Faten S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2020, 123 (05): : 738.e1 - 738.e6
  • [3] A COMPARATIVE IN VITRO STUDY ON THE RETENTION OF THE ATTACHMENT SYSTEMS FOR MANDIBULAR IMPLANT OVERDENTURES
    Ionescu, Camelia
    Patrascu, Ion
    [J]. METALURGIA INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 17 (03): : 177 - 182
  • [4] Initial retention force of three attachment systems for implant retained-mandibular overdentures: An in vitro study
    Wakam, Raphael
    Mawussi, Kwamivi B.
    Benoit, Aurelie
    Gorin, Caroline
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2024, 33 (05): : 475 - 483
  • [5] Mandibular single-implant overdentures: preliminary results of a randomised-control trial on early loading with different implant diameters and attachment systems
    Alsabeeha, Nabeel H. M.
    Payne, Alan G. T.
    De Silva, Rohana K.
    Thomson, W. Murray
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2011, 22 (03) : 330 - 337
  • [6] The effectiveness of different attachment systems maxillary and mandibular implant overdentures
    Stafford G.L.
    [J]. Evidence-Based Dentistry, 2019, 20 (1) : 26 - 27
  • [7] In vitro retention force changes during cyclic dislodging of three novel attachment systems for implant overdentures with different implant angulations
    Maniewicz, Sabrina
    Badoud, Isabelle
    Herrmann, Francois R.
    Chebib, Najla
    Ammann, Patrick
    Schimmel, Martin
    Mueller, Frauke
    Srinivasan, Murali
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2020, 31 (04) : 315 - 327
  • [8] Photoelastic Stress Distribution Produced by Different Retention Systems for a Single-Implant Mandibular Overdenture
    Machado Nascimento, Joao Francisco
    Aguiar-Junior, Fabio Afranio
    Nogueira, Tulio Eduardo
    Silveira Rodrigues, Renata Cristina
    Leles, Claudio Rodrigues
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2015, 24 (07): : 538 - 542
  • [9] A prospective cohort on the incidence of fractures in single-implant mandibular overdentures
    de Paula, Marcella Silva
    Cardoso, Joyce Borges
    Gontijo de Menezes, Eunice Ellen
    Nogueira, Tulio Eduardo
    McKenna, Gerald
    Leles, Claudio Rodrigues
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2020, 103
  • [10] Attachment Systems for Mandibular Two-Implant Overdentures: A Review of In Vitro Investigations on Retention and Wear Features
    Alsabeeha, Nabeel H. M.
    Payne, Alan G. T.
    Swain, Michael V.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2009, 22 (05) : 429 - 440