Attachment Systems for Mandibular Single-Implant Overdentures: An In Vitro Retention Force Investigation on Different Designs

被引:0
|
作者
Alsabeeha, Nabeel [1 ]
Atieh, Momen [1 ]
Swain, Michael V. [1 ]
Payne, Alan G. T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Otago, Sch Dent, Sir John Walsh Res Inst, Oral Implantol Res Grp, Dunedin, New Zealand
关键词
PROSPECTIVE CLINICAL-EVALUATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; COMPLETE DENTURES; INTERIMPLANT DISTANCE; EDENTULOUS PATIENT; BAR-CLIP; STABILITY; TRIAL; BALL; PREFERENCE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the retentive force of six different attachment systems used for mandibular single-implant overdentures, including two prototype large ball attachment designs. Materials and Methods: Two prototype ball attachments of larger dimensions (7.9 and 5.9 mm) and four commercially available ball and stud attachments of standard dimensions (2.25 and 4.0 mm) were evaluated on three identical test casts resembling an edentulous mandible with severe residual ridge resorption. Five samples from each attachment system (n = 30) were connected to three different implants (8.0-mm wide diameter, 3.75-mm regular diameter, and 4.0-mm regular diameter). An Instron testing machine with a computer software package was used to deliver a vertical dislodging force at a cross-head speed of 50 mm/min to each overdenture sample from the anterior direction. A total of 300 pull tests were conducted (50 per attachment system). The maximum load (retentive force) required to separate each overdenture from the supporting implant was then measured. Results: The highest retentive force (36.97 +/- 2.23 N) was achieved with the 7.9-mm prototype ball attachment design, followed in a decreasing order by the 5.9-mm prototype ball attachment design (32.06 +/- 2.59 N), the standard 2.25-mm ball attachment (17.32 +/- 3.68 N), Locator white (12.39 +/- 0.55 N), Locator pink (9.40 N +/- 0.74 N), and Locator blue (3.83 +/- 0.64 N). A statistically significant difference (P < .0001) was found between all attachments. Conclusions: Attachment systems of larger dimensions provided higher retentive forces for mandibular single-implant overdentures. Further in vitro and in vivo research is necessary to determine prosthodontic outcomes with these attachments in edentulous patients prior to their routine clinical use internationally. Int J Prosthodont 2010;23:160-166.
引用
收藏
页码:160 / 166
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Chewing efficiency and maximum bite force with different attachment systems of implant overdentures: a crossover study
    Elsyad, Moustafa Abdou
    Khairallah, Ahmed Samir
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2017, 28 (06) : 677 - 682
  • [32] The effect of different attachment systems with implant-retained overdentures on maximum bite force and EMG
    Ucankale, Mert
    Akoglu, Burcin
    Ozkan, Yasar
    Ozkan, Yasemin Kulak
    GERODONTOLOGY, 2012, 29 (01) : 24 - 29
  • [33] Masticatory function improvement with the use of mandibular single-implant overdentures in edentulous subjects: a systematic literature review
    Pinheiro, Mayara A.
    Meira, Ingrid A.
    Magno, Marcela B.
    Maia, Lucianne C.
    Rodrigues Garcia, Renata C.
    MINERVA STOMATOLOGICA, 2020, 69 (04): : 256 - 268
  • [34] Changes in masticatory performance of edentulous patients treated with single-implant mandibular overdentures and conventional complete dentures
    Nogueira, Tulio E.
    Schimmel, Martin
    Leles, Claudio R.
    JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2019, 46 (03) : 268 - 273
  • [35] Speaking Space, Chewing Rotational Denture Movement, OHRQoL, and Patient Expectations for Single-Implant Mandibular Overdentures
    Meira, Ingrid Andrade
    Pinheiro, Mayara Abreu
    Barreno, Andres Humberto Caceres
    de Moraes, Marcio
    Garcia, Renata Cunha Matheus Rodrigues
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2022, 35 (06) : 711 - 717
  • [36] Retention and Stability of Implant-Retained Mandibular Overdentures Using Different Types of Resilient Attachments: An In Vitro Study
    ELsyad, Moustafa Abdou
    Agha, Nora Nory
    Habib, Ahmed Ali
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2016, 31 (05) : 1040 - 1048
  • [37] Retention force and deformation of an innovative attachment model for mini-implant-retained overdentures
    Valente, Mariana L. C.
    Shimano, Marcos V. W.
    Agnelli, Jose A. M.
    dos Reis, Andrea C.
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2019, 121 (01): : 129 - 134
  • [38] Axial and Nonaxial Retention Forces of Different Designs of Milled Bar Attachments for Maxillary Implant Overdentures: An In Vitro Study
    Mahrous, Ahmed Ibrahim
    El Afandy, Hebatalla Mahmoud
    ELsyad, Moustafa Abdou
    Mohamed, Shahinaz Sayed
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2022, 37 (06) : 1195 - 1201
  • [39] Mandibular implant-supported overdentures: A prospective evaluation of the burden of prosthodontic maintenance with 3 different attachment systems
    Payne, AGT
    Solomons, YF
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2000, 13 (03) : 246 - 253
  • [40] A Comparison of Three Different Attachment Systems for Mandibular Two-Implant Overdentures: One-Year Report
    Kleis, Wilfried K.
    Kaemmerer, Peer W.
    Hartmann, Sinsa
    Al-Nawas, Bilal
    Wagner, Wilfried
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2010, 12 (03) : 209 - 218