Attachment Systems for Mandibular Single-Implant Overdentures: An In Vitro Retention Force Investigation on Different Designs

被引:0
|
作者
Alsabeeha, Nabeel [1 ]
Atieh, Momen [1 ]
Swain, Michael V. [1 ]
Payne, Alan G. T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Otago, Sch Dent, Sir John Walsh Res Inst, Oral Implantol Res Grp, Dunedin, New Zealand
关键词
PROSPECTIVE CLINICAL-EVALUATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; COMPLETE DENTURES; INTERIMPLANT DISTANCE; EDENTULOUS PATIENT; BAR-CLIP; STABILITY; TRIAL; BALL; PREFERENCE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the retentive force of six different attachment systems used for mandibular single-implant overdentures, including two prototype large ball attachment designs. Materials and Methods: Two prototype ball attachments of larger dimensions (7.9 and 5.9 mm) and four commercially available ball and stud attachments of standard dimensions (2.25 and 4.0 mm) were evaluated on three identical test casts resembling an edentulous mandible with severe residual ridge resorption. Five samples from each attachment system (n = 30) were connected to three different implants (8.0-mm wide diameter, 3.75-mm regular diameter, and 4.0-mm regular diameter). An Instron testing machine with a computer software package was used to deliver a vertical dislodging force at a cross-head speed of 50 mm/min to each overdenture sample from the anterior direction. A total of 300 pull tests were conducted (50 per attachment system). The maximum load (retentive force) required to separate each overdenture from the supporting implant was then measured. Results: The highest retentive force (36.97 +/- 2.23 N) was achieved with the 7.9-mm prototype ball attachment design, followed in a decreasing order by the 5.9-mm prototype ball attachment design (32.06 +/- 2.59 N), the standard 2.25-mm ball attachment (17.32 +/- 3.68 N), Locator white (12.39 +/- 0.55 N), Locator pink (9.40 N +/- 0.74 N), and Locator blue (3.83 +/- 0.64 N). A statistically significant difference (P < .0001) was found between all attachments. Conclusions: Attachment systems of larger dimensions provided higher retentive forces for mandibular single-implant overdentures. Further in vitro and in vivo research is necessary to determine prosthodontic outcomes with these attachments in edentulous patients prior to their routine clinical use internationally. Int J Prosthodont 2010;23:160-166.
引用
收藏
页码:160 / 166
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Masticatory function with mandibular implant-supported overdentures fitted with different attachment types
    van der Bilt, A
    Van Kampen, FMC
    Cune, MS
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCES, 2006, 114 (03) : 191 - 196
  • [42] Patient-reported outcome measures of edentulous patients restored with single-implant mandibular overdentures: A systematic review
    Fu, Liangliang
    Liu, Gufeng
    Wu, Xiaoyi
    Zhu, Zhenzhen
    Sun, Huifang
    Xia, Haibin
    JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2021, 48 (01) : 81 - 94
  • [43] The influence of implant number and attachment type on maximum bite force of mandibular overdentures: a retrospective study
    Bilhan, Hakan
    Geckili, Onur
    Mumcu, Emre
    Cilingir, Altug
    Bozdag, Ergun
    GERODONTOLOGY, 2012, 29 (02) : E116 - E120
  • [44] Immediately loaded single-implant mandibular overdentures compared to conventional complete dentures: A cost-effectiveness analysis
    Nogueira, Tulio Eduardo
    Silva, Jesio Rodrigues
    Nascimento, Lays Noleto
    Cardoso, Joyce Borges
    Srinivasan, Murali
    McKenna, Gerald
    Leles, Claudio Rodrigues
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2021, 115
  • [45] Clinical Performance and Material Properties of Single-Implant Overdenture Attachment Systems
    Alsabeeha, Nabeel H. M.
    Swain, Michael V.
    Payne, Alan G. T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2011, 24 (03) : 247 - 254
  • [46] Implant-retained mandibular overdentures; a multicenter study on different implant systems.
    Mejier, HJA
    Geertman, ME
    Raghoebar, GM
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2000, 79 : 603 - 603
  • [47] An In-vitro Evaluation of Retention Force of All PEEK, All Zirconia and Zirconia-PEEK Telescopic Attachment for Mandibular Overdentures
    Mahalakshmi, Gujjalapudi
    Sruthi, Thandra Naga
    Sharma, Pradeep Kumar
    Thandava, Muneendra
    Mitra, Nirban
    Patel, Nirav G.
    Manas, Abhigyan
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND BIOALLIED SCIENCES, 2023, 15 : S910 - S912
  • [48] Effect of Different Bar Designs on Axial and Nonaxial Retention Forces of Implant-Retained Maxillary Overdentures: An In Vitro Study
    Elsyad, Moustafa Abdou
    Emera, Radwa M. K.
    Ashmawy, Tarek Mohy
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2019, 34 (01) : 31 - 38
  • [49] RETENTION FORCES OF SPHERICAL ATTACHMENTS AS A FUNCTION OF IMPLANT AND MATRIX ANGULATION IN MANDIBULAR OVERDENTURES: AN IN VITRO STUDY
    Ortegon, Sergio M.
    Thompson, Geoffrey A.
    Agar, John R.
    Taylor, Thomas D.
    Perdikis, Dimitri
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2009, 101 (04): : 231 - 238
  • [50] Patient satisfaction versus retention of implant overdentures with two attachment systems: A randomized trial
    de Albuquerque, Rubens Ferreira, Jr.
    Fromentin, Olivier
    Lassauzay, Claire
    Pereira Saraiva, Maria da Conceicao
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2019, 21 (01) : 21 - 31