Photoelastic Stress Distribution Produced by Different Retention Systems for a Single-Implant Mandibular Overdenture

被引:8
|
作者
Machado Nascimento, Joao Francisco [1 ]
Aguiar-Junior, Fabio Afranio [2 ]
Nogueira, Tulio Eduardo [1 ]
Silveira Rodrigues, Renata Cristina [2 ]
Leles, Claudio Rodrigues [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Goias, Sch Dent, Dept Prevent & Oral Rehabil, BR-74605220 Goiania, Go, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto Sch Dent, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, BR-14049 Ribeirao Preto, Brazil
关键词
Stress distribution; overdenture; implant; LOAD-TRANSFER; STANDARD; CARE; SATISFACTION; ANCHORAGE; DENTURE; NUMBER; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1111/jopr.12269
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: For patients poorly adapted to conventional dentures, the single-implant mandibular overdenture has been proposed as a simplified alternative for the two-implant treatment, together with the use of immediate loading of the implant. The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the photoelastic characteristics of stress transfer around the implant in a single-implant mandibular overdenture using different types of attachments. Materials and Methods: A photoelastic model of an edentulous mandible with a resilient edentulous ridge and a unique implant located at the symphyseal region was obtained to reproduce a single implant-retained mandibular overdenture. Six 2.0 mm height attachments were selected and inserted in the same photoelastic model in a random order. A universal testing machine was used to induce axial vertical loads of 70 Ncm applied at the central incisor and at the central region of the first right molar without contact on the contralateral side. The photoelastic analysis was performed using a polariscope integrated into the testing machine. Standard separate views were photographed, using only one model per system. A visual qualitative analysis of stress-induced fringes was performed to comparatively rank the different attachment systems. Results: All attachments showed a similar tension distribution concentrated in the apical third, and the highest stress concentration was at the apical level. There was a low stress concentration at the coronal third of the implant, with no discernible stress in the first threads of the implants, except for Dalla Bona, which showed low stress at the coronal part of the implant (1 fringe). No identifiable fringes were observed when the load was applied in the molar region, which resulted from the low amount of stress transmitted by the implant for all attachments. Conclusion: The load transferred to a single mandibular implant was evenly distributed around the implant with low stress concentration, irrespective of the type of retention system.
引用
收藏
页码:538 / 542
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Retention of Different Attachment Systems for Digitally Designed Mandibular Implant Overdenture
    Abdelaziz, Medhat Sameh
    Fawzy, Aya Mohamed
    Ghali, Rami Maher
    Nassar, Hossam, I
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2023, 32 (02): : 162 - 169
  • [2] Attachment Systems for Mandibular Single-Implant Overdentures: An In Vitro Retention Force Investigation on Different Designs
    Alsabeeha, Nabeel
    Atieh, Momen
    Swain, Michael V.
    Payne, Alan G. T.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2010, 23 (02) : 160 - 166
  • [3] Photoelastic Analysis of Stress Distribution With Different Implant Systems
    Pellizzer, Eduardo Piza
    Carli, Rafael Imai
    Falcon-Antenucci, Rosse Mary
    Verri, Fellippo Ramos
    Goiato, Marcelo Coelho
    Villa, Luiz Marcelo Ribeiro
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2014, 40 (02) : 117 - 122
  • [4] Stress analysis of mandibular two-implant overdenture with different attachment systems
    Takeshita, Shin
    Kanazawa, Manabu
    Minakuchi, Shunsuke
    [J]. DENTAL MATERIALS JOURNAL, 2011, 30 (06) : 928 - 934
  • [5] Clinical Performance and Material Properties of Single-Implant Overdenture Attachment Systems
    Alsabeeha, Nabeel H. M.
    Swain, Michael V.
    Payne, Alan G. T.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2011, 24 (03) : 247 - 254
  • [6] Photoelastic Analysis of Stress Distribution in Different Retention Systems for Facial Prosthesis
    Goiato, Marcelo Coelho
    Ribeiro, Paula do Prado
    Pellizzer, Eduardo Piza
    Garcia Junior, Idelmo Rangel
    Pesqueira, Aldieris Alves
    Haddad, Marcela Filie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2009, 20 (03) : 757 - 761
  • [7] Mandibular complete denture versus single-implant overdenture: a systematic review of patient-reported outcomes
    Nogueira, T. E.
    Dias, D. R.
    Leles, C. R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2017, 44 (12) : 1004 - 1016
  • [8] Implant Stability Changes for a Single Implant Mandibular Overdenture
    Fouda, Karim
    Fahmy, Ahmed
    Aziz, Khaled
    Aal, Marwa Abdel
    Naguib, Amr
    Nabi, Nouran Abdel
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2022, 16 (03) : 619 - 626
  • [9] Retention of bar clip attachment for mandibular implant overdenture
    Nassar, Hossam, I
    Abdelaziz, Medhat Sameh
    [J]. BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [10] Retention of bar clip attachment for mandibular implant overdenture
    Hossam I. Nassar
    Medhat Sameh Abdelaziz
    [J]. BMC Oral Health, 22