Comparison of hook plate versus T-plate in the treatment of Neer type II distal clavicle fractures: a prospective matched comparative cohort study

被引:4
|
作者
Teimouri, Mehdi [1 ]
Ravanbod, Hadi [2 ]
Farrokhzad, Amirhosein [1 ]
Sabaghi, Jamal [1 ]
Mirghaderi, Seyed Peyman [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Isfahan Univ Med Sci, Ayatollah Kashani Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, Esfahan, Iran
[2] Isfahan Univ Med Sci, Al Zahra Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, Esfahan, Iran
[3] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Joint Reconstruct Res Ctr, Imam Khomeini Hosp Complex, Tehran, Iran
[4] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Students Sci Res Ctr SSRC, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Bone plates; Clavicle; Distal clavicle fracture; Hook plate; Internal fixators; T-plate; SURGICAL-TREATMENT; INTERNAL-FIXATION; UNSTABLE FRACTURES; LOCKING; OSTEOSYNTHESIS; 3RD;
D O I
10.1186/s13018-022-03261-8
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of distal clavicle fracture fixation with a hook plate versus the standard non-locking T-plate for unstable Neer type II fractures. Methods A prospective matched cohort study including two groups of hook plates and T-plates fixation was conducted in our two tertiary trauma centers. Patients with distal clavicle fractures Neer type II were assessed for union and the Constant-Murley score (CMS) at 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-ups. Inadequate radiographic consolidation > 6 months after surgery was defined as non-union. Subscales of CMSpain, CMSactivities of daily living, CMSrange of motion (ROM), and CMSstrength were also compared between groups. According to recommendations, the implant was removed after union confirmation in the hook plate at a planned second surgery. Results Sixty consecutive patients were enrolled: 30 in the T-plate group and 30 in the hook plate group. CMS showed similar functional outcomes for T-plates and hook plates at all follow-ups (Month 6: 92.0 vs. 91.7, P = 0.45). However, on the month 1 follow-up, the T-plate group scored higher than the hook plate group for ROM and pain (CMSpain = 13.0 vs. 12.3, P = 0.03; CMSROM = 35.2 vs. 33.2, P = 0.002). Despite this, Pain, ROM, and other CMS domains were comparable between groups (P > 0.05). The mean time to union was 2.5 + 1.4 months for the T-plate group and 2.3 + 1.6 months for the hook plate group (P = 0.44). There was one fixation failure in each group and one periprosthetic fracture in the hook plate group (two revisions for the hook plates and one for T-plates, P = 1.00). Non-union and other complications were not observed. Conclusion Both surgical approaches resulted in full recovery and good function. However, in the hook plate group ROM and pain scores were lower at 1 month. Standard non-locking T-plates are a viable alternative to hook plates with low cost and promising outcomes for treating displaced distal clavicle fractures.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of hook plate versus T-plate in the treatment of Neer type II distal clavicle fractures: a prospective matched comparative cohort study
    Mehdi Teimouri
    Hadi Ravanbod
    Amirhosein Farrokhzad
    Jamal Sabaghi
    Seyed Peyman Mirghaderi
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 17
  • [2] Clinical Results of Treatment Using a Clavicular Hook Plate Versus a T-plate in Neer Type II Distal Clavicle Fractures
    Tan, Hong-Lve
    Zhao, Jin-Kun
    Qian, Chen
    Shi, Yan
    Zhou, Qi
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2012, 35 (08) : E1191 - E1197
  • [3] Clavicle hook plate versus distal clavicle locking plate for Neer type II distal clavicle fractures
    Li, Liang
    Li, Tian-yan
    Jiang, Peichao
    Lin, Guizhen
    Wu, Hongxiao
    Han, Xiaochuan
    Yu, Xuezhong
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2019, 14 (01)
  • [4] Clavicle hook plate versus distal clavicle locking plate for Neer type II distal clavicle fractures
    Liang Li
    Tian-yan Li
    Peichao Jiang
    Guizhen Lin
    Hongxiao Wu
    Xiaochuan Han
    Xuezhong Yu
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 14
  • [5] Neer type II distal clavicle fractures: hook plate versus transacromial pin
    Mechchat, Atif
    Elidrissi, Mohammed
    Shimi, Mohammed
    Elibrahimi, Abdelhalim
    Elmrini, Abdelmajid
    PAN AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 20
  • [6] The Clavicle Hook Plate for Neer Type II Lateral Clavicle Fractures
    Renger, R. J.
    Roukema, G. R.
    Reurings, J. C.
    Raams, P. M.
    Font, J.
    Verleisdonk, E. J. M. M.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2009, 23 (08) : 570 - 574
  • [7] Clavicle Hook Plate for Neer Type II Lateral Clavicle Fractures
    Bhattacharyya, Rahul
    Sharma, Kavita
    Mukherjee, Pavel
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2011, 25 (03) : E30 - E30
  • [8] Hook versus locking plate fixation for Neer type-II and type-V distal clavicle fractures: a retrospective cohort study
    Michael J. Chen
    Malcolm R. DeBaun
    Brett P. Salazar
    Cara Lai
    Julius A. Bishop
    Michael J. Gardner
    European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2020, 30 : 1027 - 1031
  • [9] Hook versus locking plate fixation for Neer type-II and type-V distal clavicle fractures: a retrospective cohort study
    Chen, Michael J.
    DeBaun, Malcolm R.
    Salazar, Brett P.
    Lai, Cara
    Bishop, Julius A.
    Gardner, Michael J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2020, 30 (06): : 1027 - 1031
  • [10] Comparative analysis of locking plate versus hook plate osteosynthesis of Neer type IIB lateral clavicle fractures
    Erdle, Benjamin
    Izadpanah, Kaywan
    Jaeger, Martin
    Jensen, Patrizia
    Konstantinidis, Lukas
    Zwingmann, Joern
    Suedkamp, Norbert P.
    Maier, Dirk
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2017, 137 (05) : 651 - 662