Toward a cure for lumbar spinal stenosis: The potential of interspinous process decompression

被引:4
|
作者
Block, Jon E. [1 ]
Lavelle, William F. [2 ]
Nunley, Pierce D. [3 ]
机构
[1] 2210 Jackson St,Ste 401, San Francisco, CA 94115 USA
[2] Upstate Bone & Joint Ctr, East Syracuse, NY 13057 USA
[3] Spine Inst Louisiana, Shreveport, LA 71101 USA
关键词
DEGENERATED INTERVERTEBRAL DISCS; JOINT DISTRACTION; PROCESS IMPLANT; FACET JOINT; FOLLOW-UP; DIAGNOSIS; SPACER; PERFORMANCE; POSTURE; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1016/j.mehy.2019.109357
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
There is a growing impetus to treat aging as a disease in the quest to significantly extend the human life span through cellular regeneration methods. This approach, while promising, overlooks the fact that the evolutionary adaptation to bipedalism puts the human body in a distinctively vulnerable biomechanical and functional position. Orthograde human posture places unusually-high axial compressive loads on the weight-bearing joints of the skeleton, resulting in arthritic deterioration with aging. The effects are particularly robust in the lumbar spine were age-related degeneration, most commonly lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), is ubiquitous among the elderly. It is postulated that re-establishing a favorable mechanical environment via interventions that unload the affected spinal joint complex may mitigate and potentially reverse the structural damage that is the cardinal pathoanatomical feature of this disease. The hypothesis of this paper is that a minimally-invasive surgical procedure, interspinous process decompression (IPD), which utilizes a stand-alone intervertebral spacer, effectively unloads the diseased spinal motion segment providing a healthy micro-environment to reverse and repair age-related and genetic deterioration of the spinal motion segment. Several lines of supporting evidence are provided from long-term follow-up results of a randomized controlled trial of IPD safety and effectiveness of the Superion (R) device including clinical outcomes, reoperation rates, opioid analgesic usage and advanced imaging utilization. All of these outcomes show uniquely-favorable trends with time that imply that the benefits of IPD are structural. The compendium of evidence suggests that IPD offers both a durable palliative effect due to direct blocking of back extension and a disease-modifying effect due to unloading of the spinal joint complex.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The importance of interspinous spacers in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis
    Vinas-Rios, J. M.
    Arabmotlagh, M.
    Rahim, T.
    Schmidt, S.
    Sellei, R. M.
    Rauschmann, M.
    ORTHOPADE, 2019, 48 (10): : 831 - 836
  • [32] Interspinous implant in lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective cohort
    Bhadra, Arup Kumar
    Raman, A. S.
    Tucker, S.
    Noordeen, H. H.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2008, 18 (07): : 489 - 493
  • [33] Endoscopic decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis
    Lin, Guang-Xun
    Rui, Gang
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2023, 38 (01)
  • [34] RESULTS OF DECOMPRESSION FOR LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS
    PAINE, KWE
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 1976, (115) : 96 - 100
  • [35] RESULTS OF DECOMPRESSION FOR LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS
    REPO, A
    REHNBERG, V
    KETTUNEN, K
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 1981, 52 (04): : 457 - 457
  • [36] Microsurgical decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis
    Drumm, J.
    Branea, I.
    Pitzen, T.
    ORTHOPADE, 2010, 39 (06): : 551 - +
  • [37] Comparative Analysis of Inpatient and Outpatient Interspinous Process Device Placement for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
    Ortega, Alicia
    Sarmiento, J. Manuel
    Patil, Chirag
    Mukherjee, Debraj
    Ugiliweneza, Beatrice
    Nuno, Miriam
    Lad, Shivanand
    Boakye, Maxwell
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGICAL SURGERY PART A-CENTRAL EUROPEAN NEUROSURGERY, 2015, 76 (06) : 443 - 450
  • [38] Interspinous process decompression with the X-STOP device for lumbar spinal stenosis - A 4-year follow-up study
    Kondrashov, Dimitriy G.
    Hannibal, Matthew
    Hsu, Ken Y.
    Zucherman, James F.
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2006, 19 (05): : 323 - 327
  • [39] Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety between Interspinous Process Distraction Device and Open Decompression Surgery in Treating Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Meta Analysis
    Hong, Peiwei
    Liu, Yao
    Li, Hedong
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE SURGERY, 2015, 28 (01) : 40 - 49
  • [40] Which is the most effective treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis: Decompression, fusion, or interspinous process device? A Bayesian network meta-analysis
    Zhang, Yijian
    Lu, Dongdong
    Ji, Wei
    He, Fan
    Chen, Angela Carley
    Yang, Huilin
    Zhu, Xuesong
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRANSLATION, 2021, 26 : 45 - 53