Toward a cure for lumbar spinal stenosis: The potential of interspinous process decompression

被引:4
|
作者
Block, Jon E. [1 ]
Lavelle, William F. [2 ]
Nunley, Pierce D. [3 ]
机构
[1] 2210 Jackson St,Ste 401, San Francisco, CA 94115 USA
[2] Upstate Bone & Joint Ctr, East Syracuse, NY 13057 USA
[3] Spine Inst Louisiana, Shreveport, LA 71101 USA
关键词
DEGENERATED INTERVERTEBRAL DISCS; JOINT DISTRACTION; PROCESS IMPLANT; FACET JOINT; FOLLOW-UP; DIAGNOSIS; SPACER; PERFORMANCE; POSTURE; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1016/j.mehy.2019.109357
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
There is a growing impetus to treat aging as a disease in the quest to significantly extend the human life span through cellular regeneration methods. This approach, while promising, overlooks the fact that the evolutionary adaptation to bipedalism puts the human body in a distinctively vulnerable biomechanical and functional position. Orthograde human posture places unusually-high axial compressive loads on the weight-bearing joints of the skeleton, resulting in arthritic deterioration with aging. The effects are particularly robust in the lumbar spine were age-related degeneration, most commonly lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), is ubiquitous among the elderly. It is postulated that re-establishing a favorable mechanical environment via interventions that unload the affected spinal joint complex may mitigate and potentially reverse the structural damage that is the cardinal pathoanatomical feature of this disease. The hypothesis of this paper is that a minimally-invasive surgical procedure, interspinous process decompression (IPD), which utilizes a stand-alone intervertebral spacer, effectively unloads the diseased spinal motion segment providing a healthy micro-environment to reverse and repair age-related and genetic deterioration of the spinal motion segment. Several lines of supporting evidence are provided from long-term follow-up results of a randomized controlled trial of IPD safety and effectiveness of the Superion (R) device including clinical outcomes, reoperation rates, opioid analgesic usage and advanced imaging utilization. All of these outcomes show uniquely-favorable trends with time that imply that the benefits of IPD are structural. The compendium of evidence suggests that IPD offers both a durable palliative effect due to direct blocking of back extension and a disease-modifying effect due to unloading of the spinal joint complex.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Interspinous Process Decompression With The Superion® Spacer For Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Real-World Experience From A Device Registry
    Tekmyster, Gene
    Sayed, Dawood
    Cairns, Kevin D.
    Raso, Louis J.
    Kim, Christopher
    Block, Jon E.
    MEDICAL DEVICES-EVIDENCE AND RESEARCH, 2019, 12 : 423 - 427
  • [22] Interspinous process devices versus standard conventional surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: cost-utility analysis
    van den Akker-van Marle, M. Elske
    Moojen, Wouter A.
    Arts, Mark P.
    Vleggeert-Lankamp, Carmen L. A. M.
    Peul, Wilco C.
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2016, 16 (06): : 702 - 710
  • [23] DECOMPRESSION OF LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS
    KARASICK, JL
    NEUROSURGERY, 1990, 27 (03) : 499 - 499
  • [24] Additional dorsal interspinous stabilisation has no advantage after decompression of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis
    Cebulla, Josephin
    Staub, Lukas P.
    Barz, Thomas
    BRAIN AND SPINE, 2025, 5
  • [25] Interspinous Implant with Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression of Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis in Elderly Patients
    Ryu, Sung-Joo
    Kim, In-Soo
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN NEUROSURGICAL SOCIETY, 2010, 47 (05) : 338 - 344
  • [26] A new ceramic interspinous process spacer for lumbar spinal canal stenosis - Comments
    Benzel, Edward C.
    Sonntag, Volker K. H.
    Traynelis, Vincent C.
    Wang, Michael Y.
    Nakagawa, Hiroshi
    NEUROSURGERY, 2008, 63 (01) : 114 - 114
  • [27] Interspinous process device versus conventional decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: 5-year results of a randomized controlled trial
    Schenck, Catharina D.
    Terpstra, Sietse E. S.
    Moojen, Wouter A.
    van Zwet, Erik
    Peul, Wilco
    Arts, Mark P.
    Vleggeert-Lankamp, Carmen L. A.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2022, 36 (06) : 909 - 917
  • [28] Efficacy and safety of interspinous process device compared with alone decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhu, Changjiu
    Xiao, Guiling
    MEDICINE, 2024, 103 (23)
  • [29] Interspinous implant in lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective cohort
    Arup Kumar Bhadra
    A. S. Raman
    S. Tucker
    H. H. Noordeen
    European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2008, 18 : 489 - 493
  • [30] Interspinous Distraction in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis A Neurophysiological Perspective
    Schizas, Constantin
    Pralong, Etienne
    Tzioupis, Christopher
    Kulik, Gerit
    SPINE, 2013, 38 (24) : 2113 - 2117