Toward a cure for lumbar spinal stenosis: The potential of interspinous process decompression

被引:4
|
作者
Block, Jon E. [1 ]
Lavelle, William F. [2 ]
Nunley, Pierce D. [3 ]
机构
[1] 2210 Jackson St,Ste 401, San Francisco, CA 94115 USA
[2] Upstate Bone & Joint Ctr, East Syracuse, NY 13057 USA
[3] Spine Inst Louisiana, Shreveport, LA 71101 USA
关键词
DEGENERATED INTERVERTEBRAL DISCS; JOINT DISTRACTION; PROCESS IMPLANT; FACET JOINT; FOLLOW-UP; DIAGNOSIS; SPACER; PERFORMANCE; POSTURE; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1016/j.mehy.2019.109357
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
There is a growing impetus to treat aging as a disease in the quest to significantly extend the human life span through cellular regeneration methods. This approach, while promising, overlooks the fact that the evolutionary adaptation to bipedalism puts the human body in a distinctively vulnerable biomechanical and functional position. Orthograde human posture places unusually-high axial compressive loads on the weight-bearing joints of the skeleton, resulting in arthritic deterioration with aging. The effects are particularly robust in the lumbar spine were age-related degeneration, most commonly lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), is ubiquitous among the elderly. It is postulated that re-establishing a favorable mechanical environment via interventions that unload the affected spinal joint complex may mitigate and potentially reverse the structural damage that is the cardinal pathoanatomical feature of this disease. The hypothesis of this paper is that a minimally-invasive surgical procedure, interspinous process decompression (IPD), which utilizes a stand-alone intervertebral spacer, effectively unloads the diseased spinal motion segment providing a healthy micro-environment to reverse and repair age-related and genetic deterioration of the spinal motion segment. Several lines of supporting evidence are provided from long-term follow-up results of a randomized controlled trial of IPD safety and effectiveness of the Superion (R) device including clinical outcomes, reoperation rates, opioid analgesic usage and advanced imaging utilization. All of these outcomes show uniquely-favorable trends with time that imply that the benefits of IPD are structural. The compendium of evidence suggests that IPD offers both a durable palliative effect due to direct blocking of back extension and a disease-modifying effect due to unloading of the spinal joint complex.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Interspinous Process Decompression: Expanding Treatment Options for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
    Nunley, Pierce D.
    Shamie, A. Nick
    Blumenthal, Scott L.
    Orndorff, Douglas
    Block, Jon E.
    Geisler, Fred H.
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 2016
  • [2] Interspinous Process Decompression Improves Quality of Life in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
    Nunley, Pierce D.
    Patel, Vikas V.
    Orndorff, Douglas G.
    Lavelle, William F.
    Block, Jon E.
    Geisler, Fred H.
    MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY, 2018, 2018
  • [3] Endoscopic decompression combined with interspinous process implant fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis
    刘刚
    赵建宁
    Akira Dezawa
    中华创伤杂志(英文版), 2008, (06)
  • [4] Endoscopic decompression combined with interspinous process implant fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis
    Liu Gang
    Zhao Jian-ning
    Dezawa, Akira
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF TRAUMATOLOGY, 2008, 11 (06) : 364 - 367
  • [5] Percutaneous Decompression of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with a New Interspinous Device
    Salvatore Masala
    Roberto Fiori
    Dario Alberto Bartolucci
    Tommaso Volpi
    Eros Calabria
    Federica Novegno
    Giovanni Simonetti
    CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, 2012, 35 : 368 - 374
  • [6] Percutaneous Decompression of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with a New Interspinous Device
    Masala, Salvatore
    Fiori, Roberto
    Bartolucci, Dario Alberto
    Volpi, Tommaso
    Calabria, Eros
    Novegno, Federica
    Simonetti, Giovanni
    CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2012, 35 (02) : 368 - 374
  • [7] Interspinous process decompression is associated with a reduction in opioid analgesia in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis
    Nunley, Pierce D.
    Deer, Timothy R.
    Benyamin, Ramsin M.
    Staats, Peter S.
    Block, Jon E.
    JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2018, 11 : 2943 - 2948
  • [8] Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression and Interspinous Process Device for the Management of Symptomatic Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: a Literature Review
    Merkow, Justin
    Varhabhatla, Narayana
    Manchikanti, Laxmaiah
    Kaye, Alan D.
    Urman, Richard D.
    Yong, R. Jason
    CURRENT PAIN AND HEADACHE REPORTS, 2020, 24 (04)
  • [9] Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression and Interspinous Process Device for the Management of Symptomatic Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: a Literature Review
    Justin Merkow
    Narayana Varhabhatla
    Laxmaiah Manchikanti
    Alan D. Kaye
    Richard D. Urman
    R. Jason Yong
    Current Pain and Headache Reports, 2020, 24
  • [10] Five-year durability of stand-alone interspinous process decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis
    Nunley, Pierce D.
    Patel, Vikas V.
    Orndorff, Douglas G.
    Lavelle, William F.
    Block, Jon E.
    Geisler, Fred H.
    CLINICAL INTERVENTIONS IN AGING, 2017, 12 : 1409 - 1417