Planning complementary conservation of crop wild relative diversity in southern Africa

被引:13
|
作者
Brehm, Joana Magos [1 ]
Gaisberger, Hannes [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Kell, Shelagh [1 ]
Parra-Quijano, Mauricio [5 ]
Thormann, Imke [2 ,3 ]
Dulloo, Mohammad Ehsan [6 ,7 ]
Maxted, Nigel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Sch Biosci, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
[2] Alliance Biovers Int, Rome, Italy
[3] Int Ctr Trop Agr CIAT, Rome, Italy
[4] Paris Lodron Univ Salzburg, Dept Geoinformat, Salzburg, Austria
[5] Univ Nacl Colombia, Fac Ciencias Agr, Ciudad Univ, Bogota, Colombia
[6] Alliance Biovers Int, Rose Hill, Mauritius
[7] Int Ctr Trop Agr CIAT, Rose Hill, Mauritius
关键词
CAPFITOGEN; climate change analysis; conservation planning; crop wild relatives; diversity analysis; ex situ; gap analysis; genetic conservation; in situ; species distribution modelling; IN-SITU CONSERVATION; CLIMATE-CHANGE; BIODIVERSITY; INVENTORY; AREAS;
D O I
10.1111/ddi.13512
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Aim To identify priority areas for in situ conservation and collection of germplasm for ex situ backup of crop wild relative (CWR) diversity in the Southern African Development Community (SADC) region as part of an action plan for the conservation and use of the region's important CWR diversity. Location SADC region. Methods Diversity, gap and climate change analyses at species and ecogeographic diversity levels were undertaken for 113 regional priority CWR taxa. Results CWR hotspots were identified in Eswatini (former Swaziland), Malawi, Mozambique, South Africa, Tanzania and Zimbabwe. Twenty-one per cent of regionally priority CWR occur exclusively outside existing protected areas (PAs), 50% are not conserved ex situ, and 64% are predicted to be negatively impacted by climate change. A total of 120 existing PAs in 13 countries were identified as containing populations likely to persist in the future for 80% of CWR taxa and about 50% of the ecogeographic diversity of these taxa; remaining diversity can be conserved in an additional 151 complementary sites in 11 countries. Democratic Republic of the Congo, Madagascar, South Africa and Tanzania contain important areas for conserving CWR diversity in situ in which no negative climate change impact is predicted. Priority CWR diversity in the provinces of Bas-Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo) and Cabinda (Angola) is threatened by climate change and should be collected urgently for ex situ conservation. Other areas rich in ecogeographic diversity that is not conserved ex situ are located in Angola, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Eswatini, Madagascar, Malawi, Mauritius, Mozambique, South Africa, Tanzania and Zimbabwe. Main conclusions We identified 120 PAs and 151 complementary sites outside of PAs in 13 SADC countries that could form the basis of the SADC Network for In Situ Conservation of CWR. We also selected priority areas for filling gaps in ex situ collections and for field survey.
引用
收藏
页码:1358 / 1372
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Development of national crop wild relative conservation strategies in European countries
    Labokas, Juozas
    Maxted, Nigel
    Kell, Shelagh
    Brehm, Joana Magos
    Maria Iriondo, Jose
    GENETIC RESOURCES AND CROP EVOLUTION, 2018, 65 (05) : 1385 - 1403
  • [32] In situ conservation of Helosciadium nodiflorum: a crop wild relative of celery in Germany
    Inga Mewis
    Nadine Bernhardt
    Maria Bönisch
    Jonathan Brassac
    Annette Naumann
    Matthias Zander
    Uta Schirmak
    Marion Nachtigall
    Christian Ulrichs
    Conservation Genetics, 2024, 25 (1) : 227 - 243
  • [33] Conservation, Markets & the Environment in Southern and Eastern Africa: Commodifying the 'Wild'
    Trefon, Theodore
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF AFRICAN STUDIES, 2023, 57 (03) : 770 - 772
  • [34] Dormancy release, germination and ex situ conservation of the southern highland papaya (Vasconcellea quercifolia, Caricaceae), a wild crop relative
    Manuela Urtasun, Maria
    Mabel Giamminola, Eugenia
    Baskin, Carol Caudle
    Leonor de Viana, Marta
    Nahuel Morandini, Marcelo
    Yanina Lama, Carola
    Fernanda Rojas, Macarena
    SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE, 2020, 263
  • [35] Priority areas for the in situ conservation of crop wild relatives in South Africa
    Holness, Stephen
    Hamer, Michelle
    Brehm, Joana Magos
    Raimondo, Domitilla
    PLANT GENETIC RESOURCES-CHARACTERIZATION AND UTILIZATION, 2019, 17 (02): : 115 - 127
  • [36] Agrobiodiversity Conservation: Securing the Diversity of Crop Wild Relatives and Landraces Preface
    AGROBIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION: SECURING THE DIVERSITY OF CROP WILD RELATIVES AND LANDRACES, 2012, : IX - X
  • [37] Complementary practices supporting conservation agriculture in southern Africa. A review
    Thierfelder, Christian
    Baudron, Frederic
    Setimela, Peter
    Nyagumbo, Isaiah
    Mupangwa, Walter
    Mhlanga, Blessing
    Lee, Nicole
    Gerard, Bruno
    AGRONOMY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 38 (02)
  • [38] Complementary practices supporting conservation agriculture in southern Africa. A review
    Christian Thierfelder
    Frédéric Baudron
    Peter Setimela
    Isaiah Nyagumbo
    Walter Mupangwa
    Blessing Mhlanga
    Nicole Lee
    Bruno Gérard
    Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2018, 38
  • [39] Review of congruence between global crop wild relative hotspots and centres of crop origin/diversity
    Maxted, Nigel
    Vincent, Holly
    GENETIC RESOURCES AND CROP EVOLUTION, 2021, 68 (04) : 1283 - 1297
  • [40] Review of congruence between global crop wild relative hotspots and centres of crop origin/diversity
    Nigel Maxted
    Holly Vincent
    Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 2021, 68 : 1283 - 1297